All Activity

Are you playing in 1080p? Go 4K and increase the GFX settings. Yes, you can get 330 fps (even though DCS can start to glitch when approaching 300 from my observations), but there is absolutely no point to it. Cap it at 120 (or maybe the default 180) and be happy. Every headroom beyond that is better invested in resolution and visual fidelity. And, risking to repeat myself, those number are meaningless, unless you specify the scenery and your settings.

You are?

If you go to the exterior view as the aircraft is levitating, as it's coming to the end of a repair, you'll see it mis-aligns with (the tail-wheel drops below) ground level/carrier deck, this results in a sudden jolt as it realigns and I believe this keeps the tail-wheel in a perpetually damaged state. So it cannot freely castor as it should. Wind etc is irrelevant. The tail-wheel never 'works fine' as you say, never has, not for anyone. This is precisely what the Patch notes refer to as having been fixed, and it hasn't. I can't believe I have to argue this point with anyone.

There is only one proper solution to improve readability of HUD elements (and gauges in general), and I don't mean that in a condescenting or ridicule way - Zoom in (a "realistic" zoom-factor or fov would be between 60-80 depending on the size and distance to your screen) and/or get a bigger screen. Some things, like the Mig's HUD in this case but many instruments in most Aircraft, are really hard to read on screen.

Also ich kann nir sagen, dass meine Quest Pro augenscheinlich die Hand und jeden einzelnen Finger sehr gut trackt. Jedenfalls sieht der Handschuh in DCS genauso aus wie meine Hand in der jeweiligen Haltung. Aber wenn ich dann einen Schalter oder Button bedienen will ist Fehlanzeige…

wip

Hey! I'm interested. Will send you a dm

Ok, i think i found out something here. If I stay online after launching the sim it works. Everything runs smoothly, but if I go offline the loading of everything stops

I just bought the NS 430 because of the MiG 29, and I have to say that it's a really well-made GPS navigation system. The only thing I'm wondering is whether it's possible to hide the integrated GPS model somehow? I mean the physical model that's in the cockpit. It does get in the way a little bit I know how to show or hide the NS430 in the window with shift+alt+b

у меня немного другие цифры вышли. но да, от ГС варианта подошли.

Its possible that these problems are related, but obvious? Why in the world would a damaged tailwheel work fine without wind? The only function of the tailwheel is to swivel around freely. If the damage would prohibit this, it wouldn´t work anytime. So I would expect the taxi bug to be a little more complicated and rather connected to the aerodymanics on the surface of the vertical stabilizer than the tailwheel. And don´t get me wrong I am higly disappointed that I can´t fly the Corsair for weeks or even months comming but after Rudels awnsers I did not expect anything to happen in this patch. Woul´d be nice to hear from him, if it will be adressed in the next patch, or if they are even working on it yet.

My nVidia driver is from before the Summer I think..

Hi Sirrah, in my opinion there is a noticeable improvement on performance, especially when you are low level. However please note that this is my "feeling", I never tracked my fps. Cheers

Да! В том то и дело. У 29 по моим прикидкам и пробам поле вых должно иметь значение -61…-62 примерно - это момент включения форсажа. Ну а поле вх в этот момент - когда наш девайс коснулся детентов, у всех по разному.

Already asked. You can't change it. And it is most likely realistic.

Also the original Fuse is set to 11.5 seconds on the FAB-500 make sure to look at that too.

Yeah. One of the reasons Yugoslavia never operated T variant. With them attached. Radar would be useless

Воспользовался твоим советом. Хм, на VPC СМ3 ограничители на 72%, подходят на 16/15/18, а тут нет, в 1-й вылет топливо спалил всё.

You guys think the taxi bug and the fact the aircraft is damaged from the get-go are unrelated? Occam's Razor anyone? In my opinion, this issue doesn't require separate threads, it requires consolidation. It's obvious they're related. Unlike you @OmasRachE, I am more disappointed than I already was, because the Patch notes suggested we were finally getting a fix and we didn't. I'd love to fly the Corsair and be as oblivious as @Art-J, but I don't because the immersion for me is so badly effected. I agree, it's absolutely unbelievable that this 'fix' wasn't tested before release of the Patch. I suspect it's more complex a problem than first realised, related to Magnitude's supposed bespoke damage model.

Is there any way to edit the size of the symbology on the new MiG-29's HUD? It's too small and awkward. I think there's enough room for it to be larger. (Although unrealistic,) the new MiG-29's HUD is too small. Not everyone has perfect vision; age is unforgiving. Excuse my Google Translate English.

Hi, I think I followed the instructions (ask for ground power, switch on battery, ext. power reset (which springs back to mid pos) and then swithces P1-P4), but the radio won't turn on and the alignment wont start. Most instruments work, but not the radio. Only when I start the R engine can I progress. Am I missing something herre?

You can change this in general measurements option. Switch everything to Russian.

This is a really simple machine.

В мануале за управление механизмом триммерного эффекта отвечает 4-позиционный нажимной переключатель. Что должно происходить при его нажатии?

Don't mix it in mig-29. Not designed for that.