All Activity

If you have a large monitor and it's close filling much of the forward view it's advantageous to set it small so as not to interfere with the inside tracking. Big bright sudden scenery changes from a moving flight simulation won't help you get steady tracking.

10°? That's to much. Germany itself has a elongation under 10°

My problem is with Enigma, with their content creation and their past "opinions," which is why I haven't watched their video. And no, I don't have any problem with ASC; on the contrary, I'm grateful for the great work they're doing.

Пробовал на JF-17, F-14, AV-8B в двух режимах CCIP CCRP, летят камнем вниз не обращая внимания на прицел вычислителя.

Objectively, I do not disagree with anything you said. Fare enough. But clarification, are you saying Enigma has said some things in the past or Matt from ASC?

Thank you for your observation. Actually, the keyboard keys for the rudder no longer work on any paid module. How did you program your rudder? Which axis? My TPR is on the YAW axis, and the small white bar on the axis moves fine. However, it no longer works in the game; it's impossible to turn the wheel. The rudder axis control is no longer present. Is this also the case for you? Thanks Raymond

Dude, in case you missed it: I’M NOT ED STAFF. Don’t try to come after me for giving someone accurate information that you don’t like.

bonjour la livrée à été complétée vous pouvez la télécharger de nouveau merci pour votre retour

Historical charts are off by like 10° in the year 1987...

Maybe use this

I never said that people are asking for making the contract public. I said people don't have the right to see even the smallest part of the contracts because it's not their business. But the keep asking for things like this (as you said by yourself): This is for sure a part of the contract and we as normal customers don't have the right to get this information. Not how it is writen, not how long the clause and not if it's even part of the specific contract. Just not at all!! I don't know what people here think they are to even ask for something like this. I don't get it and it's really annoying to read questions like this again and again.

2 things: -Everthing pre-2018 is beyond ED commitment, everything post 2018 ED claims they have the game files for, so technically they should be able to keep supporting those -Who did you send your money to buying a Razbam module? Because AFAIK, the site that requested my payment was Eagle Dynamics', not Razbam's In a twist of irony concerning that last point: as RB stopped receiving customer payments through ED, any upkeep from RB's side has been suspended Who's paying for that extra diskspace? Some guys already are running 2.5 for the Hawk next to Current version, what are they gonna do if other modules get orphaned? At what point is that gonna get silly?

Thanks @Flappie It seems that on F18 the issue is also visible on the HMD. Would you be able to add it to your comparisons ?

nullnull

Ищу ролик DCS, который смотрел в 2021–2022 годах: два Миража летят строем, в небе виден самолёт AWACS, потом они вроде как сражаются с миГами-29 в конце два самолёта выравниваются (миража), один пилот отдаёт честь рукой и катапультируется. Возможно, автор — француз. Буду благодарен за любые ссылки/таймкоды!

I know that information is contractual. I understand that But we as customers are the other side, the paying side of this niche hobby- business. And part of this is based on mutual confidence, that is builded through years of relations with us, customers. This confidence can be destroyed by many things, some very fast, some very slow. Just consider the damage to that confidence could do when, i say when no if, we, customers cant fly anymore 4 modules if we want DCS up to date. Just think about It, ask ED to think about It and take decisions. We as customers will take ours depending on yours.

Any chance someone could make this? This is i believe the 2023 bird.

we will be sharing news soon. thank you

Bump! @SkateZilla any update?

I agree it would be nice to have some way to show. But what you are asking for is related to contracts, and confidentiality agreements, so please dont ignore what I am saying. As mentioned if that changes in the future we will let you all know.

Hi Currenthill, will this update be released before the end of this year, or do we have to wait until next year?

Im not sure, I will try asking in their discord about the BD campaigns

I'm still having performance issues with stuttering after reinstalling DCS completely from scratch. I've started testing, starting the SIM with nothing plugged in, no HOTAS, no displays, no extra modules, no mods of any kind other than DCS. In other words, bare-metal DCS. The version I currently have of the Nvidia drivers, with an Asus TUF RTX3080 OC, is 580.88. When I start the FA-18 in this configuration, it runs smoothly and perfectly without stuttering. The moment I connect the WINWING MIP, the full HOTAS and nothing else, the moment I get into the runway with the plane and begin to climb, the stuttering starts, making it impossible to fly, let alone complete a mission. I'm reinstalling everything in slow motion, due to work, absences, family, etc. Everything was working fine until the update in middle march. After that is a nightmare. After reading threads like this one: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/369884-choosing-the-right-nvidia-driver-is-the-latest-version-always-the-best/?_fromLogin=1 Could you give me your opinion on which are the best versions of the NVIDIA drivers for DCS? That thread is from earlier this year, and some changes may have occurred regarding the versions. dcs.logdcs.log.old Thank you very much.

Also have the feeling that the map isn't really alligned.