Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/27/10 in all areas

  1. Eagle Dynamics///Ka-50///Bazar///Graphics------> replace mfd file! Night Vision- This will give you night vision at night and a color view during the day... Only the contrast knob works! For some reason the brightness does not work, but it's not needed. To get the night vision to show you need to switch the HMS toggle switch on then off... Fake FLIR- This will give you a black and white image! It kind of reminds me of FLIR using reverse polarity.. Black = Hot.... Makes it pretty easy to spot targets during the day.. It doesn't work that great for night time use. Only the brightness knob works! Contrast does nothing... Make sure to make a backup copy of the original file... Shkval-Display-Mods.rar
    1 point
  2. Let's put things into perspective:
    1 point
  3. An attempt to Eradicate Sexism?
    1 point
  4. I tested both and unfortunetely Night version doesn't help at all at night. I really want to have Night Shkval (picture like in Merkurij in LO) toget Ka-50 N ;] Day version is even nice, however for me too high contrast ;]
    1 point
  5. Wasn't the game designed in such a way as to allow for these mods? I mean, files could have been locked out by the designers, but the choice was made somewhere along the way to allow the game to be modded by the community and I for one, am glad they did. I think it's a great way to add some freshness to the game and to keep people interested in it, and I would bet that the majority of serious players are using a mod in one form or another. I know that I check here regularly to see what new mods have been uploaded and really appreciate it when people take the time to share with the community. It just seemed a little rude to criticize someone for attempting to improve the game in their own way and share their work, especially from a moderator.
    1 point
  6. Теперь у тебя есть на это целый месяц.
    1 point
  7. oh ok I mean heat blur sry ^^ Hm and why its not working in the MP Modus? Cant understand it. For the Rudder Movement the same. Because I can see the same things from the jets. Why not from the Helicopters too?
    1 point
  8. PoAF F-16 S/N 15133 about to return to service after having dug a trench in a ducth base last year. It suffered a structural check up. Crash: Taxi tests last week: With this, if my count is not mistakened, completes the fleet of the first 20 MLU's. The rest of the block 15's will be retired and boxed up for convertion this year.
    1 point
  9. Sorry I did not meant that SU-27 started in 1990, I meant the condition of the aircraft during 1990 (i.e. Avionics, engine type, maintenance, etc.)
    1 point
  10. Контрольное висение на Ми-8МТ, слышны характерные щелчки триммера:)
    1 point
  11. To many variable guys. To properly compare any aircraft you have to get into specifics. What I mean is, specific year, model, country, capabilities, etc. For example, I think a SU-27 from Russia circa 1990 as it was used operationally would have the advantage over a USAF F-16C block 25 as it was used in 1990. IIRC at the time F-16 did not have AIM-120 capability, only in testing. F-16 RADAR, back then wasn't as capable, etc. My point is that to compare aircraft like this, is better to compare specific models. We also have to watch our preferences. I love the F-16 so of course I will by bias in favor of the F-16. Just saying
    1 point
  12. Extremely flawed scenario, since said flankers would also be doing the tango with batteries of Hawk and Patriot, as well as the assets of the Republic of China navy. Any type of aircraft is only as good as the role it fills, wherefore context is everything. Example: F22. Superb piece of kit. Worthless against the taliban. (Excepting their SDB capability...) See my point?
    1 point
  13. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A10c :P Note that the version to be simulated in DCS is the C model, not the A model.
    1 point
  14. Yes, big chill pill here for you guys and your reactions. Nothing wrong with sharing this type of mod, but then there is nothing wrong noting that it is unrealistic or problematic for multi-player, is there? It is not an elitist comment to make. I believe it's actually good that this kind of mod and the questions that it raises comes up here in the forums. Once LO 2.0 comes out, with the focus more on player vs. player, the concern will be even greater. Seems like what I mentioned before. In LO 2.0 you will need to have everything locked down so the server files match the client files. Then, server administrators can offer a mod pack for clients wishing to fly on that particular server. Looks like the only way I think.
    1 point
  15. Go slowly, use the terrain to your advantage. Try to find somewhere to observe target areas and potential enemy ambush positions from standoff range.
    1 point
  16. I have to say, I agree with Chibawang. I browse these forums a lot and I usually don't have any reason to post, but I would be disappointed if people who are creating modifications for the game start feeling as though they shouldn't be sharing them publically for fear of being scolded by an elitist few. I have never played DCS online, so I cannot say whether such modifications are used maliciously, but it is irrelevant anyway. If they can be used in such a way then posting them on this forum with the best of intentions is going to benefit those who want to use the mod in SP, and alert developers to possible flaws with the multiplayer/mod system. Saying that modifications which have the possibility of affecting MP shouldn't be posted (obviously with the requirement that the modification has some merit in SP and in its own right), is analogous to burying your head in the sand. Additionally, if such problems with a modification are addressed in a polite and constructive manner, then the developer of the modification is far more likely to consider it next time.
    1 point
  17. Was there a need to be rude and elitist? No. Modifying files in this manner is a completely different affair from discovering exploits/ways to circumvent server restrictions. While I am not interested in this mod personally, I've seen alot of posts complaining about the lack of FLIR etc. in the KA-50, so apparently alot of people are and I see no reason to cut someone down for taking creative liberties with their own sim experience. Also, and I hope I'm not mounting too high of a horse here, but why do you capitalize every other word in your posts?
    1 point
  18. Every admin can choose what to block so I don't see any problem at all.
    1 point
  19. Great, one more unrealistic mod that needs to be blocked online.
    1 point
  20. A small part I just finished. The small data panel on the top. Just to relax from the work on the main panel. :thumbup: I still need to wire it though.
    1 point
  21. In the PilotLogBook folder, find the XML document ["PilotMissions(X).xml] which is yours and change any Ejections="1" to Ejections="0" and save. That should take care of it. If it does not, then I'm out of ideas because that's where the data for the summary comes from. Rich
    1 point
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...