DetroitDieseL

Yeah if you want to help gather info for the model that will be great. I may have a good line drawing of it in my collection- I'll check into it. The cockpit will be basically the F-15 coclpit correct?

That image I posted is of the T-50, the Russian counterpart to the F-22. I figured if there is a mod A/C of the F-22 there should be a T-50- Not sure if that is going to be the disignation (T-50) or if it is just while in its last prototype stage. Also i have done some research on it and it looks like the 47 was a prototype for testing newer advancements in the Russians A/C inventory. That is now being used towards the T-50 I image it is going to be disignated as something other then a T-50-AFAIK- maybe SU-50....IHNC. But sure I'll use your cockpit. I've been flying LOMAC for years but have never messed with the modded A/C side of it. I'm going to have to get all the things I need to make it happen, and also some kind of directions on how to do it. I have the modeling down- just need to know how to get it into FC2. Any guidance is appreciated.:music_whistling:

I see so the fuel and the little ones are on pylons. Gotcha. The big boys must be stored in bombbays then eh??

Then I'm going to make this one--

I'll make the model. But I don't believe the F-22 has pylons for missles, I think theyre in a bombbay.

I'm surprised that nobodies on here demanding this bird be in the next module................:pilotfly:

And thats your opinion. Some of the posts and threads are un-needed. Like, "I want a beta version." or, " Let the community decide if we want a bugged game." These kinds of statments are just stupid.

Releasing an RC to the community is more work for the ED Team. I'm sure if they need any more help from us they would ask, or pluck whom ever they thought could help out of here. That being said, IMO think that threads like this is just pressuring them. Let them be to work on it- to release a final finished version that works perfect instead of trying to get bits and pieces that don't work. Com'on be honest, don't you sense that they're a bit under pressure- from Wags or who ever when they post on these kinds of threads. Give em a break. Edit: Arma isn't a realistic combat sim- IRL every joe-smoe doesn't hop into a 30 million dollar Tank, or helo, or aircraft. Or save points to unlock NonMos weapons. That point is irrelevent.

There is a beta out first- and the bete testers are testing it. I like how ED is handling this. They want to release a good product and not a semi par one. Everyone in here going on and on about it is just working themselves into a twitter. Just sit back and enjoy what you already have. FC2 and BS are the 2 best Combat sims out, they can only get better. Stop painting ED into a corner, let them work. Don't pressure them. Lock this thread.

Awesome- can these be used in FC2 also or no??

In my exp. in calling for air support with an A-10 the angle of attack is a little less then a 45 degree angle if not more- making the density of the fooliage a lot less- unless the canopy of the forest/woods/jungle is great. But I do not see it being so much that TIS or any other kind of signature sight not being able to see it. I've seen heat signatures inside of buildings with the TIS that I used. I realize that theres a couple different arguments going on here. I think ED did a very good job with the trees for targeting purposes and cpu resource saving purposes. Its realistic to me. Although I would like the option to make the line where the trees disappear/appear further out for myself, as I think my rig can handle it. I have every graphic setting maxed out and it still seems liek the trees appear right in front of my nose, buildings also. Is there a setting some where where I can make it a greater distance when they appear solid??

Does this mean that a download version will be ready sooner??

I don't agree with you- hiding behind trees in this day and age of combat as well as air combat doesn't happen. If an enemy colume is traversing through a forest or woods- there is Tanks and other vehicles with sights that use thermal imaging or radar making the trees out of play for either side.

IRL it would not be wise to expect trees to cover you from the enemy, as they are probably tracking/scanning on your heat signature making the trees useless. I have exp. using a TIS and I have personally shot targets through trees as I seen right through them. I think ED did the right thing with the trees to save our cpu/gpu resources. Although I would like to see trees too, it looks alot more awe and some.

Yeah- thats normal. If your running it for the entire time your flying then the tracks are going to get huge.

Yeah, it looks the same..... I think FC and BS look and feel much more realistic.

Gotcha, well I pretty much suck, so I try a get what kills I do get to count- instead of being robbed of them.

Rgr that. It sounds like a plan. I hope that this can be put in motion, because it diffently takes away from the game. Is it just me that feels this way? I'm not alone- wanting this to be stopped, am I??

Wouldn't that just stop the player/exploiter from coming back in right away. It would not stop them from bailing out of gameplay before they were destroyed.

What I didn't like was the graphics, the realism may have been there, but not as far as seeing it. I want detail that I can see. Post some screenshots of f4. aIt all looked flat and plain to me, no detail no sense of 3d at all imo.

Rgr that.

Thanks buddy, Maybe I can see this stuff coming from your ass-end when I shoot you down later- on the opposing side and not my side........ Also while I got ya here. I just installed modman and I was wondering it doesn't seem that I can install all the mods I dl'ed, when I install one the other goes yellow. Only one at the top says its installed all the rest are yellow??

Neg. I've been here. I got Falcon after getting LOMAC, and compare everything to it, IMHO F4 doesn't cut it compared to LOMAC.

I bought Falcon years ago- installed it- ran it- was disgusted- uninstalled it- snapped the cd in 2- threw it away.

I went to your link Route- said it wasn't there. Can it be used in FC2? because I was in your squadrons server when they were talking about it.