theOden

Feels like I could do this too :D

Thanks for a great Campaign Apache. Never had so much fun in the '15 since I bought it. Sadly, getting trashed at mission #16 by the fact that one has to be inside a enemy plane tailpipe to see them in DCS I call done. Was a great ride until now though.

Well done Apache600. Really enjoyed mission #2 but I do have some room for improvement using my MiG-15 guns :) Looking forward to next mission already.

Looks like Rb 74 to me. Any detail you see that makes it something else then an AIM-9L? Edit: ah, now I see it, that front canard is more like the 9D etc. - I think it's a early mockup of the Rb 74 before it was received, to show case the Rb 74 and Sky Flash arrangement.

Nice link Cool Breeze, thank you for that one. The F-20 seem to be very close to F-16C avionics wise, such a module would be very welcome.

I don't believe you but you can convince me by sending me you current build, tonight already! (it was worth a try) :pilotfly:

Mine looks ok, nothing like your attachment (looks very ArmA3 AAF). 1.5.3.52018 Edit_ Oh, I misread - it's your 2.0 that's gone wonky I guess - I don't run that.

1. MiG-15 2. P-51D 3. FC3 - MiG29A

Salvo/Single will be just fine - it was after all available on the training rocketpod.

Putting myself in the purist section for this module I prefer to have options open in games for all kinds of What-if scenarios - purist level comes from mission building, not what Tools we have in the toolbox. Way too often "realism-fanatics" demand that there should be no what-if's possible, I just can't understand how they Think (there's a few examples in the F-14 section and way too many in ArmA where I do most of my addon and mission creations).

You and your MP sessions will be missed Blooze.

Rb 04E is a Solid Fuel Rocket with some 32km range and the 15F has a turbofan giving it 5 brazillion km range (or some 100-200km rather depending on MkI/II/III - I could be wrong on these typing out of memory but you get the picture) Even the older Rb 04 had frequency agile (hopping) radar making it quite awesome for its time.

I'm totally with you Ramsey. I've put the 18C on ignore since a few months back pretty much all that bolser some interest now is this and the F-14. Guess I've been leathernecked too.

Haha JaNk0, correct and spot on :)

As a purist I will go with the AGM-65A when I dress in a green overall and a mopedhjälm when I will be flying this thing (an old yellow JOFA helmet won't cut it, right?). Like matte, I would also like to hear if the 75T will be included?

IFF has never been about identifying hostile aircrafts. It's been constructed to do the opposite, identify friendly crafts so you can put those on ignore and continue investigating all others.

Add to that the Rb 75 also comes in Rb 75T which has a heavier blast warhead (just like the copy-cat 'mericaans later added with the AGM-65G :) ) And more important (importanter if you like beer), the Rb 04E looks like a Star Wars Tie Fighter so it must be good or plain awesome.

What BravoYankee4 said but also, everyone must admit that the coolest of them all is the SF-37, looks like a shark mixed with a Ferrari. I will not take "no" as an reply :) :pilotfly:

I guess. And yes, while AJ37 might be capable of some 50000 ft ceiling I would say its effective ceiling is 1000 ft :) Also, since AJ means J in secondary role I guess it would be used against non-escorted heavy bombers etc. and not against agile fighters. Oh well, still looking forward to try this one out - there is even a huge risk I will sidestep my rule of not buying beta-releases ever again.

I see. So locking the target is not locking the target but successfully measuring the distance. (rather than "instantly" getting the range to target using normal radar puls return time, to avoid ground clutter) This makes me consider the PS-37 way less effective AA tool compared to the PS-01 of the previous J-35 Draken. Strange. But i guess in the early AJ years the Draken was taking care of air targets (until JA37 came about).

Reading the documents I'm with mattebubben on this, it clearly says "låsning" which I would expect being the same as a lock (just like running the F-16C in ACM Bore Sight Mode)? What did we miss?

Sweet Molly, tht's some golden documents there renhanxue - makes me sooo keen to just fly NAV for hours and hours.

AMEN :)

:worthy: :)

This is what makes me very curious on the ViD and how it actually looks like to the pilot. First time I saw a 37 cockpit I assumed one was to look into this small view for targetting the Mav's but as I read up on this gear just a few months ago I started to Think there's something more to this display. (and in Falcon 4 I made it the RWR haha)