theOden

This made me laugh. :)

How does advertising improve a product?

I too would like to see more FC3 level planes along with better simulation in DCS World (missiles, hiteffects, jammers, ai-behaviour etc.). Make it a new 4-pack planes minimum each year please.

Yes please, folding fin and caves (bergrum in plain Swädish). All Viggens could fold the fin to be used with the infrastructure that was built for J 35 Draken.

Haha, Ok. Take your time (but please fix SPA target tracking first, free cookies at stake) Ok, did some tests. Seems speed-related. Taking off and opening canopy at about 300 kmh works fine but at 500 and faster it gets worse. 1st person view keeps canopy but not 3rd person. Pressing Canopy Eject button works fine even at mach 1 but 3rd person canopy stays. Hopefully this can narrow down what code lines to search.

Yeah, a little bit confusing but the manual is beta too so :)

Page 180: The alternate landing base L2 can only be entered as a reference number, cannot be entered as longitude and latitude.

You could ask razbam or belsimtek, works for them.

Tried "Repair DCS World" still getting IC failure. Do I have to reinstall the whole bang?

I'm pretty sure you quoted the wrong post.

So there will be no more AJS updates to 1.5.6 but we should wait for 2.5?

Only I know of is SWAFRAP flying AJSF 37 in Poland during the exercise "Strong Resolve" (the AJS upgrade of SF 37 Reconnaissance version also the best looking Viggen of all times :) ).

All that needs to be said :D

Great news HF, could I ask for a picture for us 1.5 pilots?

Transonic speed.

Spot on. Same goes with other forums too (BIS, BMS, IL2). Count what sales a few hundred MP screamers account for and see how many months 5 developers salary can be payed from that.

You are very correct with that but also, there is a simulation side too and being an active Falcon BMS e-pilot I would say the very last thing DCS needs is better looks. DCS slaps any flight sim hands down when it comes to visuals already, in current build - simming, not so much. I sense priorities has gone wonky somewhere.

You guys really like looks don't you?

Forget the bonus dollars and never look back at them again. Ever.

Problem (maybe bug). Anyone managed to track a SKU-level target finding it's speed and direction? I manage to get my M1 to become S1 and from there I orbit for 3 minutes and when trying to add a track to the S1 (S is not blinking) I don't get the direction etc. on the digits. If anyone managed to complete this process please describe your steps.

One has to think "These are not bombs". Setup Wpn Selector to ATTACK and "Spacing" to LYS RAKT Then set your waypoint as target waypoint (TAKT/in 9 on B1 in example) and stay in TAKT/out to see you still have the 4 bomb-racks (0 1 1 1 1 0) since this delivery will NOT give you a "FÄLLD LAST". As you approach your target steerpoint flip over from NAV to Attack Now, usually you drop/launch on the blink since you're supposed to pull-up pretty hard but here I am just keeping level flight and still holding the trigger. Just as I pretty much pass M1 I can see the (0 1 1 1 1 0) indicate drop by going (0 1 0 0 1 0) and finally all zeros. After release it takes quite a few seconds before the illumination starts:

Re-arming Rb-04E after landing explodes the plane (and all nearby) Current release version as of date.

Yes you can, per pod. On your right hand you have the switch for Rb04 to go group or single target - they used this as a workaround to select all (grupp) or single fire (enkel). So, with 4 pods you will fire 4 rockets.

Yes. :) Andplease renhanxue, remember now you are on the internet :) Just saying.

running on Ethernet or WLAN?