Pilgrim

Man cool down I haven't even read you asking me to change it. Even as it might be your third time getting upset it's my first time noticing it. :) But hey thanks for doing it for me. Are you by any chance merrickan? There is this phenomenon I can't get my head arround. It's ok to bomb the crap out of places or impose sanctions on the poorest people on the planet but whatever you do don't use the f- or s-word in public. Not saying that you do any of those bad things it's just that double standard that confuses me. It's allways them merrickans complaining about the use of those words hehe.

Let's make this an AMD vs. Intel thread ;) I for example have Intel and no problemo. Sorry couldn't help myself hehe

I also would like a copy of the CD. If not for free perhaps at discounted price. I would feel better having 1.1 on a cd than just on my HD.

Will there be some check for what addons are compliant with 1.1? I have all the old addons but I dont know which to keep and which to discard.

Hmm. Depends. If there are many manpads out there you don't want to go to low. But than again if there are "real" sams you don't want to go to high either. Perhaps someone with insight could teach us more?

Is that bablefish talking? I couldn't understand didley.

It seems I can't save when in a campaign mission. I get some error saying that the file could not be saved. Should it be possible to save from inside campaign missions?

That is a good question. I'm all for universal axis

fneb :).............

Sounds more like a fragmented drive or to little ram. Defrag and buy more ram if you have less than 1024

I say EULA's make good toilet paper ;)

Hi all I have played this mission (Routine Flight?) over and over and frankly i'm getting sick of it. First of all. I have emptied my whole load of rockets on those two ships w/o sinking them. Second. I get chewed appart trying to get close. And since it is foggy I need to get close to get a visual. Has anyone cleared this mission?

Allthough not lo-mac related this is my first problem with 1.1. I can't seem to map the following to my X45 RWin-I Change radar search modes PRF (pulse repetition frequency) Interleaved PRF (AUT) – HI PRF (PPS) – MED PRF (ZPS) It simply doesn't understand that it is supposed to map RWin+I and instead maps Rwin I. Has anyone had luck mapping Rwin+I to the X45? All other double key commands (Shift,Alt,Ctrl+something) work fine. It's just Rwin that's not working. Anyone?

1,2,3. Easy as pie. And I'm flying :)

Here it is boys and girls. The thread that will piss some ppl off. Mostly them who have problems. But hey. I'm not one of them :) Imagine my surprise when I saw it was out. I had given up hope on having it released this week. Thanks ED. Everything worked out smooth for me. I followed Wags instructions and now I'm flying 1.1. One happy camper here. Guess what. I'm free tomorrow. Muahaha. Drunk flying here I come

I'm fine here. Haven't tried multiplayer yet thought but campaigns work and I have gained performance. :) I'm one happy camper. Thanks ED. No back to work with ya. I'm looking forward to a new addon.

Man your connection is fast :) I'm getting it at 1.5MB/s

I guess a company can behave like this in russia. I would like to see this behaviour survive in the long race. Tards!

What if you use a known distance and time it when you fly? Just to see if d=v*t

Man you really added to the conversation there b ;)

I'm going for a long shot here. I have been thinking about what could be done to improve the code. When I read the info about realtime tracking of units that are not seen I come to think of PVS trees. (Potentially Visible Sets) or even better dPVS (Dynamical Potentially Visible sets) For you that don't know what that is they are data structures that handle what is seen from the viewers position. For example it doesn't render objects that are not visible for the viewer because they are hidden behind something else. A bad algorithm here or a bad Binary Space Partitioning algorithm reduces performance mucho. One other thing that came to mind is the use of dynamic polygon models. There is no use of rendering polygons at a distance where they are only represented by one pixel on the screen. Does lo-mac use subdivision surfaces? I know the code comes from flanker and I thought there might be some new aspects of 3d rendering and object tracking that could be implemented. Could anyone with some insight fill me in?

Hit me. Got my Track IR and a good profile now so I will be pulling kobras out of my pockets and using helmet sight all the time :)

Made you read! April fools muahaha

Ok. Verdict time. I have been flying for a couple of hours and I'm getting the hang of it. I think I will need to go with the hat solution since I need more points for the tracker to follow. I sometimes get some weird movements and I suspect it could be the lack of reference points. I have 4 now. Great fun though ;)

Didn't get the hat. I have used dots on my headphones and one between my eyes on my glasses :) Does anyone have good values for the curve?