PD919

One improvement for each campaign would be that Reforger 1 to have cold starts on missions not in the air, and on Reforger 2 to give you an option. To change radios and waypoints instead of Jester.

Dcs bug. Try exiting mission and pressing fly again.

Would rather have ED make the cockpit click able even if they didn't make it 100% up to full fidelity. I would like workable radios, navigation, ILS, TACAN, etc. I wouldn't even mind if they just ripped it from the A10 or F16 instead of accurately modeled. It would make the F15C fit in DCS better.

A quick workaround that has worked for me is that once I load into a mission, I test it. If it doesn't work I quit and press fly again in the mission recap.

There is a weird ground lighting effect caused by the light sources only illuminating on the ground out of one screen. If I close one eye the image looks either lit or until but will be "half lit" otherwise.

What are your next campaign projects coming up?

I bombed the bunkers. Then I bombed the SCUDs. There was no update to move to the next step in the mission. I even went down to the ground to use guns on the wreckage to try and advance.

I guess I found a small work around. If I close the mission and reload it then sometimes the TCS/Lantirn will start to work.

They are transforming it to two months with this one.

It's all well and good for marketing but with the sheer volume of F-15E content it looks like it's out. If I had just discovered DCS I'd being going to this forum wondering why my F-15E download isn't working because someone on Youtube seems to have theirs working. We are talking 1000 sub channels here too. I want a quality product more than it being rushed out the door, but if it works well enough for a content creator, it probably works well enough for people who ordered it understanding it's early access. It'll still be buggy as anything on initial release. No one will be upset about that. If someone is upset about bugs in early access that's their problem. I don't remember the Apache getting sent to that many people before release. There were maybe a few previews and Wags. If there was one or two previews and Notso's tutorials, I think the backlash would be minor or nonexistent.

Unless they release it by the end of the week/month, they all have it so early that it feels like mockery. It's mainly the videos of people like GS playing around in it. If they were dry tutorial videos, I'd feel different. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth. If I didn't get the extra discount for pre-ordering I wouldn't after seeing it.

I believe there is a Tomcat VR mod that makes it more readable.

Half year of the Strike Eagle

In SteamVR a lot of work went into the motion compensation to make sure the prop on WW2 planes don't artifact. Is there a way to make this happen in OpenXR. My P51 sight looks very bubbly with OpenXR. Otherwise OpenXR runs better.

2 weeks

The Tomcat's RWR seems give less notifications of getting targeted by a SAM or AI. Is this in my head or are they modeled differently?

Who cares about the scope. It's a great way to support the plane after EA.

I think that RAZBAM should add import functionality to the F-15E instead of keeping it restricted to USAF. Obviously, it doesn't have to be first on the list, but it would be fun to launch HARMS on an F-15E. In general every DCS module should model more off of manufacturing specs vs military restrictions, like how export Hornets have an ILS even if the Navy doesn't.

A later Corsair will also be more competitive with the 109 as well. I'm sure they will add a carrier and the Corsair to the Normandy map for MP. Even if it's not as realistic, it's possible, and it's more fun.

I have a Virpil WarBRD, F-18/F-15E stick, and a Warthog throttle. I want to make the controls as 1:1 as possible. Is there a button map for the real F-15E available yet as well?

Based off what was explained here, the RIO/WSO is not necessary for the Strike Eagle to operate. Maybe you have to jump in the backseat for a second to start one of the systems or something, and then you can do everything from the cockpit. F-14 is literally impossible to use without a RIO. RIO aligns the INS. RIO does all of the radar work in BVR, etc. I'm assuming the Phantom needs the RIO like the F-14.

I'm trying to figure it out. Is the WSO solely to split the workload or are there some important functions that we won't really be able to take advantage of outside of multicrew?

I am cautiously optimistic that the Strike Eagle is the next module.

Well as much as DLSS would ultimate help VR performance as it will enable a higher resolution and better effects, I think even implementing something like TAA would help. MSAA does a lot to smooth out the image but it is a GPU killer even with a RTX 4090. TAA might provide a good balance between image and performance.

If the 38.6 FM station isn't working, is there a VOR or ADF we could use to mimic the homing?