Tarres

Yes you are right. Maybe some implementation bug. Is the Huey VOR system working in the NTTR map with the last update? About the RSBN in the Caucasus, these are the RSBN stations (only RSBN, not PRMG) in the Caucasus area before the breakup of the USSR (from FSX/Xplane soviet aviation data, but it´s the most accurate that I have found) Format: LAT/LONG/Morse code/Channel Anapa: 44º59.9/37º20.3/AB/36 Sochi: 43º24.1/39º56.9/RC/23 Min-Vody: 44º13.5/43º05.6/7NR/33 Sukhumi: 42º52.0/41º07.0/AV/24 Batumi: 41º36/41º35/not available/04 Kutaisi: 42º11.0/42º28.0/UY/21 Tbilisi: 41º40/44º57/RF/26 After the breakup, a lot of RSBN were closed and changed for western systems (VOR) to allow navigation for the newer western planes that the new airlines bought, and for political and cots reasons. RSBN are now basically a military system, this is the reason that we only have RSBN stations in Russian AFB in the Caucasus map, circa 2008. As you said, I hope that in the medium/long term we will be able to select "time frames" for the map navigation aids.

Maybe the Y channels are tied/reserved for Airborne or Naval TACANs in DCS? About the VOR/DME, there is no airplane that uses the VOR/DME system, maybe it´s related to this.

Great work Gospadin! Have you received the link that I sent you? Ramsay, RSBN is for civil and military air navigation. PRMG is only for military use. Until the breakup of the USSR, there was RSBN stations at Batumi, Tbilisi and other airfields.. I have sent the data to Gospadin.

The Nevada/NTTR map.

Great mod Gospadin. PM sent.

The ARK-22 frequencies are now editable in the ME (1.5.2)

Mission Planner or mission editor. I think that L-39 Quick missions in the NTTR will be updated.

R-832M ranges are: VHF: 118-140 and UHF:220-389.95 No problems here in the Caucasus or in the NTTR.

Reported in the bugtracker. https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.com/m/issue_page.php?id=35 It seems that it is not possible to fix it. They recommend lower the graphical settings

Beautiful evening landing...

Hi Werner. Great as always. Comments: .-Maybe the weapons system selector must be in the "off" position. .-Taxi lights on and retract them when airborne, before the plane reaches the speed limit for the landing/taxi lights system. Thanks!

Yes. Bug.

The ABRIS is linked with the Datalink system, but not with the navigation system. As Mirmidón says navigation system is linked only to the PVI-800. You can have a 56 WP flightplan in the ABRIS, but only 6 WP in the PVI, that is the nav system linked to the HUD and the instruments.

Quick question. Can the Kneeboard Builder be upgraded to read the new radio presets for the helos (ARK-22&R-828 for the KA-50, UHF for the Huey and R-828&836 for the Hip)?

In the Mission Editor, there are 2 "F-5E" entries listed under "Turkey/CAP". I think that only happens with this combo of country and task. DCSW 1.5.2 and 2.0, new install.

Edit: it seems that the installation copies the files under cockpit/english from the beta... So no oficial english cockpit.

Only ED, BST and Razbam use the "standard files" for navigation in DCSW maps. Other 3rd parties use "custom" navigation systems for now. It could be much better if all of them make use of the "standard files" but it´s a decision of the developers. Regards.

Hi Grunf. I think that it isn't possible to do that. I've tried to do something similar but no joy. Maybe it's one of the reasons for the "99 channels" and "72 channels" of the nav systems. Regards.

F-5E-3 is the F-5E, block 3 of the USAF. It's the "mid-update" of the early 80's, fitted with an RWR, a more advanced radar, -159 like the export variants without the "camera mode for the AGM-65" and improved radio and radio navigation equipment along with other minor things. A simple midlife update for the USAF Aggressor force.

@blkspade. If you can detect a Kh-58 then It's a bug. The RP-22 can't detect a missile with their technology. Too fast and very little CRS to detect it. You can detect for example a Kh-20 that is more or less a MiG-21 in size and weight, but nothing else.

If the RP-22 can see a missile (maybe except the gargantuan KH-20 and similars), this is a bug.

Thanks Finger!

The R-55 is the IR variant of the beam rider RS-2U. It was designed by the Zvezda OKB. There isn't a SARH variant of the R-55.

In summary: RS-2U: old beam rider air to air missile developed for the MiG-19PFM and SU-9 interceptors of the PVO. Used in limited quantities in the 21PFM (RP-21M weapon system), incompatible with the RP-22 weapon system of the bis. Added by the developers for gameplay purposes. R-55: RS-2U fitted with the IR seeker of the R-3S. Used for training only. R-3S: direct copy of the AIM-9B. R-13M: New seeker and cooling system, better suited for dogfight. Better range and flight performance, Maybe a Aim-9D, roughly. R-13M1 last improvement of the R-3/R-13 family. New aerodynamics. better flight performance. Roughly a -9G. R-60: dogfight missile. All for the agility. Very short range, small warhead but very improved flight dynamics. R-60M: Improved seeker and warhead. R-3R: SARH missile, not suited for agile targets. Similar to the ill-fated AIM-9C KH-66: A/G beam rider missile. Like the RS-2U, incompatible with the RP-22 Weapon System. Added by the developers for gameplay purposes. S-24 and 24B: frag (A) and concrete piercing (B) warheads. FAB: M54 series: high drag bombs; M62 series: low drag bombs. About thee TU sufix, I´m not sure, maybe "retarded" or some type of detonator. I hope that this will be useful.

Translation problem Arrow. Sorry, you are right.