Tarres

Clean install of beta today with the last update 1.2.16.42215. Dcs stops working inmediatly after loading a mission with a Huey and select Start. Tested in a Training mission (Cold start) and in a simple mssion created in the ME with a Huey in the Runway ready fot take-off or ready for a cold start. Logs attached. Thanks in advance.

1.- C 2.- A 3.- A 4.- A

Please close this post. Now it´s working. I don´t know why didn´t work before. Thanks

Now it´s working.... 1.- set arc-5 in manual, no code. 2.- set arc-5 in preset mode, set ndb preset: code ok. 3.- set arc-5 in manual after step 2, now I can hear the Morse Code. Maybe not a bug.

Clean reinstall of DCS. I am unable to hear any NDB Morse signal from the ARK-5 system. Switches set in ARK, Antenna, and ARK volume at max and I have a good signal from the station but I can´t hear any morse code. Navigation to and from the NDB is OK. Try the ARK presets in a custom mission, same thing. Maybe I´m missing something. Thanks in advance.

About the frequency range. The R-802V (mislabelled R-828 in game, maybe a bug) is a VHF/UHF radio. Frequency range is 100-149, 200-399, like the R-800L1/R-863 In the game only works in the 100-150Mhz (like the SCR-522 of the TF/P-51) Maybe it colud be better to adapt the R-800L1 of the KA-50 or the R-863 of the Hip for the Fishbed instead of thr SCR-522. Thanks in advance.

A pair of questions about ARK-10/R-828 Radio. A pair of possible bugs or maybe are WIP implementations. The RV-7 switch (Compass/antenna) is not functional: . - Compass: standard mode of operation. Needle in the HSI points to the NDB radio statation . - Antenna: allow to hear the Morse code. Maybe it´s the RV-10 The RV-10 switch (Radio/compass) maybe it´s the RV-7. The RV-10 in the compass position should allow us to see in the HSI the direction of the radio emitter. For example, putting a unit in the ME emitting a signal in 140AM and the RV-10 in the position “Compass”, the HIS needle should point to the station. It´s an R-828 Radio like the one in the HIP and HOKUM The selector NEAR-FAR. CU-92. This is more a “Wish” for a future real implementation. Ability to be able to set the 17 ARK presets in the ME like the ARK-5 in the MiG-15. The CU-92 allows us to select between the “FAR” (“pushbutton 1-9” RV-08 and “NEAR” (selector RV-37: 8 stations). Maybe with the use of the standard “beacons.lua” of ED instead of the R_NAV of the module this will be possible. Furthermore, this allows for a future maps to set the beacons easier than editing the LUA and to use the RSNB/PRMG and the ARK with the associated objects for the RSBN/PRGM and NDB. (If the RSBN in Krymsk is destroyed, you don´t have a signal in the channel 28 on the RSBN, but you have a PRMG signal in the Channel 16) Thanks and sorry for my English. Miguel Serrat "Tarres"

Same here. After updating the BIOS, the MIG-21 module, asks for activation and it says "Activation is successfully completed. License parameters: Activations left: 8" I click OK but I have to do kill the process via Task Manager. The activation program hangs on. Resolved deleting the key in the register, but I loose 2 activation in the process, the 2 times that I have to kill the process. In another Bios update, I haven´t got any problem with any module. Tarres

Thanks Towsim. Like Grand said it´s only a "minimun inconvenience". You are right, only happens in certain machines, maybe some Windows update related to libraries, like you said. Great support as always! Tarres

Same problema as Grand, in Single and MP. Windows 8.1/ Aries 1.976a/DCS up to date, clean install and no mods, and no other plugin in TS. Thanks in advance.

In the MiG-21 module, RSBN/PRMG are listed in an independent file. You can put a RSBN anyway on the map, editing this file with a coordinates, codes and morse signal without a vehicle and this point will work as a RSBN/PRMG. There is no diference for the LN module. The beacons.lua file, where the real RSBN/PRMG are defined and are asociated with vehicles, along with the TACA/VOR/ILS...is working only for ED/BST modules. Until we´ve got the L-39 module, we won´t have a proper RSBN/PRMG simulation. I have a moded file with the RSBN/PRMG restricted to the Airbases that have it, along with a restricted 16 only signals (with Standard morse code, so you can listen the same morse code when you fly the Fagot or the Hokum, or the Huey) for the ARK-10, like the real 21. Regards.

Clean Install 1.976+New Aries.dll Installation without any problem. Thanks Towsim!

Thanks Towsim.

Windows 8.1 pro as administrator, running all software with admin privilegies.

No joy. Clean install of 1.976. TS3 crashes on startup. Deleting AriesProtocol.exe. Aries is show as "deactivated" (no tic) in settings/plugins. TS3 crashes when I try to actívate Aries pluign in Settings/plugins. For now the only way to make 1.976 work have been to install 1.976 without uninstall 1.973beta. I have a "dcs stop working" when I quit a mission but I press accept and DCS continues to work without problem, even with a debriefing log.

Same problem as HMA. Solved installing 1.976 without uninstall 1.973beta. Only problem is that I have a "DCS stop working" when I quit the misión, but I press "Accept" and DCS Works without problem, even with a mision log. 2 bugs in the Mi-8: as Mirmidon reported, ICS/Radio values are reversed and preset frequencies of R-863 seem to be out of range: 14Mhz instead of 140Mhz for example. But I have no problems with manual tuning of the R-863 in the central console. Thanks. Update: If I deactive the Aries plugin in TS/setting/plugins and close TS, I´ve a TS crash when I try to start the TS. I´ve to reinstall 1.973 to solve it.

UH-1H. 2nd test. From the sea to Gelendzik. HDG:30, altitude:1000 meters/3000ft, distance:+100km No VOR signal until the helicopter is below 500mts/1500ft at +110km At 30KM from VOR, signal lost if I'm over 30meters/150ft. I think there is something wrong with the LOS of VOR

In beta 1.2.16 update1, at +30km from Kutaisi VOR, clear LOS, if altitude is higher than 150 meters/500 feet (aprox), signal lost from VOR. Edit, max altitude before signal lost, 500mts/1500ft. Clear LOS, distance +100km

Like the R-73, this Igla mount was only displayed in a mock-up in the 90´s. The outer pylon that carries the Igla it´s now only being tested in the 52. Some Mi-24 of the PVO carried R-60 after the "Mathias Rust incident" for border patrol missions. Mi-24 upgraded to 35M will be able to carry the IGLA too, if pass tests. The 2 KA-50 that were combat tested in Chechenya didn´t have an Abris. They were under control of a KA-29 control helicopter, i don´t remenber what subtype, for targeting and navigation aid. So, for a "completely real simulation of the operative KA-50", we need to remove the ABRIS. Regards.

Mirage III, USAF century series, first F-4 variants (B/C/D/J/N) and F-8 are suitable oponents for the 21"no-bis". 21bis entered in service in 1972/3. Maybe the future Mirage F-1 from Aviodev is the perfect nemesis for the 21bis, alongside with F-4E/S, F-104S, 14A, 15A, 16A, JA-37 and the rest of the airplanes of the late 70's and first 80's. Regards.

From 1.2.11 I think, russian FC3 airplanes have real PRMG systems according to the real world. Only aerodromes with this system give you indications for an instumental nav cues in the HSI and the HUD. Beslan doesn´t has a PRGM system, so you haven´t got any indications on the HSI. Only military bases have PRMG systems: Krymsk, Krasnodar Center, Maykop and Mineralye (civil-military), I think. Regards.

The RuAF 25SM,doesn´t have any radar pod or Shkval or SEAD pod. It´s a simple upgrade for the nav/attack suite of the 25A plus the capacity for use new guided EO-Bombs. It has a right MFCD for nav and control, but nothing more. The first use of "25SM" was by Sukhoi for a upgrade with radar, EO Pods, and more things, but was dropped by excesive costs. Regards.

The T was created to be a specialized Anti-tank airplane with the same attack and navigation suite of the KA-50. SEAD and other pods were displayed in prototypes of the Sukhoi Factory in airshows (even one carried a MMW radar pod with AS-17, R-77, R-27, KH-35, all dummies of course....) The TM´s were tested with an enhaced nav and attack suite more capable. I don´t known if it was tested in a SEAD/DEAD rol but I think that it was highly improbable. SEAD missions were carried by specialized SU-24 and MiG-25. Sorry for my english. Bye!

If we could have a real 25T, real loadouts would be restricted by the capacities of the attack computer, so: .- combinations of as much as 2 different weapons. Note that different rocket subtypes (S-80FP2, S-80KOM...) count as "different weapons" since it has different balistics in each subtype. .- No SEAD, Mercury or Omul ECM pods. .- Vihkr loadouts: only vihkr and fuel tanks. .- the most external hardpoints, not the A/A, are empty, unless in a very short range missions. The T attack/nav suite shares the same basic design of the KA-50 attack/nav suite (25T was designed as a specialized anti-tank airplane), the TM was designed with an improved attack suite but only 3 were builded as a "rebuild prototypes". About SEAD, a number of two seaters bielorussians (UBM I think) were tested as a SEAD, with the operator in the second seat to control the Phantasmagoria pod. Best regards.

I will send you a PM but, if I have to make an overview... Perfect and elegant as always Flagurm. :thumbup: Thanks.