Crash *

Personally, I think a VR body is very important. It is essential for immersion. It also gives you a feeling for the correct proportions of the aircraft and the position of the head in VR. If someone has the feeling that the VR body is constricting everything, then congratulations, now you know how a real pilot feels. That's kind of what we want, isn't it? For everyone who doesn't want the VR body, you can just turn it off. I agree that 2D users can hardly see the body and can do without it. Still. VR is the future and I love ED for recognizing and implementing it early on. I consider a module without a VR body to be incomplete and unfinished. The reason why I haven't bought the F16 yet is solely because there is no VR body. I am also annoyed that the VR body in the KA-50 was simply removed and nothing comes on request. But in a community in which it is important that every switch works exactly like in RL, how can some people do without the pilot completely? If the pilot were missing in the external model, oh what would the howling be. It is a shame, but understandable, if the body is only implemented in the final phase, but it should always be included as a standard. DCS should set standards and not be based on cheap software. I hope that some old modules like the A-10C and the Mig 21 will ever get a VR body. That was a lot of text, but that was and is an important topic to me.

Hello Polychop. The Gazelle SA342 M was available from mid-1973. The HOT 3 rockets only started in 1998. That means that the DCS is missing 25 years in which I can use the SA 343 M sensibly. Hence my request: Can you add a missile armament like HOT 2 or others? Then I can also use the SA342 M in the time frame from 1973 to 1998. That the armament does not have to be as great as the HOT 3 is logical and would not be a problem, but the timeline would be adhered to. Even if ED now wants to develop all weapons itself, can you request something or integrate an existing alternative from the time frame? I hope for an answer. Best regards.

Ob sich eine Mi-8 Staffel kurz vor dem erscheinen der Mi-24 lohnt? Eigentlich schade, jetzt wo endlich einer da ist, der sich damit auskennt. Aber in ein paar Wochen wird jeder nur die Mi-24 fliegen wollen. Selbst ED kümmert sich schon seit Jahren nicht mehr um die Mi-8. Wirklich traurig.

Has anyone tested whether there is any effect on the Harrier pilot when flying at high altitude without oxygen?

Leg dir ein 2tes Icon an mit folgender Startzeile: "D:\DCS World OpenBeta\bin\DCS.exe" --force_disable_VR Sollte gehen.

Die ist leider nicht angekündigt, aber den Tornado würde ich auch unbedingt haben wollen. Aber da gibt es keine Freigabe seitens des Herstellers, wenn ich mich recht erinnere. (nicht drauf festnageln)

Hello dear responsibles, an answer would be very welcome. If you do not want to make a pilot body, then give us a clear NO. But don´t ignore us, please.

Vor 2.7 ging das mit Linker STRG-Pause. Jetzt geht das bei mir nur noch mir Rechter STRG-Pause. Hoffe das hilft.

Das wäre schon toll. Zumal die Chance groß wäre, dass die Jungs gleich mehrere Versionen anbieten in einem Modul.

Ich muss hier mal ne Lanze brechen, die Harrier und die M2000C haben ganz gewaltig aufgeholt. Der Community (die ordenlich Druck gemacht hat) sei Dank. Mi-24 Hind, BS3, Kiowa, Apache und natürlich die Bo-105 Eurofighter F-4 Phantom, AH-1 Cobra , Vietnam Map (egal ob fraglich...das muss einfach mal kommen )

please, can you try it again? Or i missunderstood something? flying in high altitude without oxygen should be enough to get blurry. But there is no hypoxia effect to me.

As the title says. Flying long time in 40.000 feet with Oxygen off, there is no suffer or blackout for the pilot.

I also have a wish: don't let this great machine rot. The old BST models do NOT receive any attention. Only the Huey with multicrew, but without the Mi-24 in the neck, that would not have happened either. 2021 should be the year of the helicopter ... hah. It's almost June and NOTHING has happened. If it's the money, I'll be happy to pay for a makeover of the individual models. Nothing for years. Not even reactions here in the forum. I am not disappointed, but now I am very frustrated. Please bring your modules up to date and react to your customers here in the forum from time to time.

Dear Heatblur Team. There is no pilot's body yet, but until then I would think it would be great if the VR pilot's head position wasn't so terribly forward. The upper front mirror would also have to be adjusted a little differently. Is it possible to set this up for VR until the VR body is done? Many Thanks!

Here is a short simple Mission Track. Hope it helps. In SP there is a significant of FPS drop when the other 4 Hueys and me firing. In MP the impact is much harder. LOW_FPS_Minigun.trk

Playing in Multiplayer with some Huey firing Miniguns, the FPS Drops from 45 fps down to 5-15 FPS and that is unplayable. This is not an 2.7 issue. This was also in 2.5. Hope you will find a solution. If it is caused by the tracers, it could maybe an option which only show every 10th bullet with a tracer.

Nicht bewegen leuchtet mir ein, aber betanken und bewaffnen auch nicht? Macht das wirklich was aus?

Wenn Du das gespiegelte Bild am Monitor meinst, dann ja, es ist neu. Man kann da diverse Dinge in den Optionen einstellen.

Entweder du belegst eine Tastenkombo (Modifier + ?). Aber nimm etwas ausgefallenes, damit du nicht im Luftkampf dich versehentlich rausschießt. Oder du benutzt Voice Attack. Die Demoversion hat 10 kostenlose Kommandos.

Nibbylot? Is that the guy who made this cool AH-6 Mod?

That would be a great addition. And if it should be military, then just a red cross or a red crescent moon on a white background. Transporting the injured and there is an ambulance at arrival, that would be great. Or attack a convoy, but in no case hit the ambulance ... that would also be a scenario. If the existing tent is then provided with the cross and / or crescent, then we already have a complete set. I'm not a programmer, but it should be easy to do. Copy Land Rover / red cross on it / rename = done. Mods are great, but if one doesn't join in, the whole group can't play.

It would be nice if there were different boxes that could be loaded into the helicopter. Boxes of ammunition, spare parts, medical supplies, or food. As soon as the helicopter lands at a certain distance from the boxes. Can these be loaded within a given time frame and the helicopter would become heavier. Larger helicopters can move more boxes and larger loads. It would be nice if, like with the supercarrier, loading staff could drastically reduce the loading time with a forklift if they were set. It would give a big boost to all of the logistics. Missions like: An outpost urgently needs 4 boxes of medical supplies and 3 boxes of food in order to be operational again. Or bring 6 boxes of spare parts to the ship off the coast so that it is seaworthy again. These boxes should be visually present and disappear when loading into the helicopter and only reappear when unloading. Should the helicopter crash, the cargo would be destroyed.

Hello ED? Many of us would really love to have this very old question answered. A simple yes or no would be very nice to start with. @ BIGNEWY can you ask, please? The A-10C is great, but the empty seat in the cockpit is an immersionbreaker. I'm not invisible.

It's coming true. I am looking forward to.

Great podcast. Gero makes a confident impression. I'm hooked. If TrueGrit's claim is in line with current standards, then you've already sold a copy to me. I wish the team every success.