YoYo

I don't really understand, everything is fine here. NVG is standard DCS "system". You can control the intensity, plus here you can turn ON/OFF ODA symbols. I know that for some people DLSS works poorly, but that applies to DCS in general, I use MSAA and have nothing to complain about.

Generally, I'm also a bit surprised that there isn't such an option. He should normally work as a gunner and handle weapons even (Hellfires for example), something like Gearge AI or Patro. As for the gunner, it doesn't seem to require too complicated actions to make it work, we have gunners in Huey, Mi-24P or Mi-8MTV. PC wrote that they have plans to do something with CoPilot, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed for such an implementation as well.

No, however it will be feature „nice to have”, he could be work as a gunner too with orders from F10 menu. Its possible to do it.

No issue here on full version. Maybe trial issue only.

FLIR / TIS wasnt touched by PC, about quality picture check this topic: ED did some changes in 2.9.6 patch.

Dont joke even.

Default.

Good, so it wasnt onlu my luck ;). I much prefer the current version to what was there before 2.9.6. Interestingly, there is nothing about it in the Changelog, but the changes are visible, it is also harder to see the object on the ground from a long distance (no longer large black square like was before). Good move!

I think there have been changes in 2.9.6. I don't see that big dot now (however I did only 2 tests with diogfight + A2G attack), I guess things are starting to look good. What do you think?

No, problem exists on the current part of map, I can wait for the buildings and objects, but something is wrong with the textures:

? Su-25?

I checked one, there is no FOB there but there is a small town, civilian

And yet surprise :).

As announced, Mbucchia stopped supporting further development of OXR Toolkit and Quad views, I wouldn't expect a solution, although he visits here sometimes, maybe he can be convinced? For me everything is ok. 2.9.6 only reset my OXR Toolkit, I set it again and everything is ok, but I don't use Quad views because it caused problems for me.

Done:

Hello, first of all, of course, thank you for the map, I'm glad that we finally have Afghanistan, at least in part. However, I would like to draw your attention to the rather poor "quality" of the ground textures, compared to other desert maps: PG, Syria, Sinai or even Nevada. The map is very uneven in terms of texture quality. Of course, I'm talking about the current area, which is EA, but as I understand it, this part should be 100% completed? Compared to Syria, for example, we unfortunately have a much worse map in terms of background textures. Few examples: sometimes the map looks very good and everything is great here unfortunately, sometimes we have transitions between the areas made probably by hand and the phototextures (?), in the form of sharp edges, unfortunately it looks terrible, sometimes it takes strange shapes that do not match the rest, it looks like... old "textures ideas" from texture autogen from Flight Simulator 2004 even with an error caused during installation and finally, there are areas that are quite blurry, probably a phototextures but somehow I have the impression that it looks worse than on other desert maps (resolution problem?) and worse than on Kola and SA maps. Not my screen, maybe not even the worst, but you can see it on the sticker: Will the current map area be improved in this respect? Syria is perfect in this respect, here it is somehow strange, flying low. Maybe it will be ok for jets at 13.000 ft +, but for low altitude flights it is, let's be honest, very average by 2024 standards.

Yes, for me with VR everything is ok, I noticed that OXR Toolkit was reseted only and I needed set up it again but everthing works fine (I dont use quadview btw).

Noticed too, we have a lot transitions like this on this new map, doesnt look good. This example isnt too bad, but with green fields looks worse. I’ll open the topic about it in the Afghan map corner. The answer is simply, link cable has better compression, its very visible. On air link you can use only 250 Mb/s bitrate, on the cable 960. Near 4x more.

Some changes are in FLIR, unfortunately what happened in my opinion is worse. The last version was quite ok, now the picture looks different than before the patch and the differences are smaller instead of bigger.

Something incoming:

Im sure it was something like this ;). All testers have it so nobody noticed what happens if someone has FC3 only. We have to wait for a hotfix or changes for ED autorization server.

Unfortunately, the idea is not good, it obscures the map. Alternatively, maybe add a new function in the map options - on/off countries? Now it doesn't look nice, at least to me.

I feel like something has changed in the patch DCS 2.9.6.57650. Now the "heat effect" seems to have been reduced, and the FLIR image appears more faded and similar, rather than more distinct. Overall, things haven't been bad lately, although he didn't stand out enough, now it's gone the other way. Am I the only one who feels this way?

Reported and answered.

I also see this in new module menager: notice about installation (perhaps) - red dot, but the list is empty: