rob10

Really, the WW software hasn't given me reason to. 97% of my issues are user error (forgetting to start it ). For what I use it for it's pretty plug and play easy. If it wasn't for syncing the lighting for the A-G and A-A lights etc I really wouldn't need it. But now we're just derailing the OP intent.

When I first started working full time out of university, the company I was working for had their pension plan go bankrupt. The pensioners instantly had their monthly cheques cut in half. Most of them were hourly workers that wouldn't have had a high income to begin with. It was at least 5 years (likely longer IIRC) before that got settled out of court and there was little or no communication other than the occasional "we're working on it" from the class action lawsuit that resulted. And I'd argue it was a little higher priority to get solved than a frozen DCS module for the pensioners affected. Hopefully this goes faster, but 8 months is hardly even the end of the beginning stage yet.

Totally get that. I have the WinWing full MIP setup and if I forget to run the SimAppPro software or it isn't working for some reason, I have to stop and restart everything or it drives me nuts . But I also understand that just because ** I ** want something doesn't mean that very many people want the same and therefore may not be an ED priority.

If you're so convinced that so many use multi-screen in ED maybe post a survey asking. And look at the number of total respondents that actually have it vs the % that do use it (those who do are more likely to respond, so if 10 say yes and 5 say no that suggests very few total users actually use it). Because while you think a majority use multi-screen I haven't seen any evidence that there are very many users just based on the total posts regarding it in the forums (even versus VR which is arguably no where near the majority of users).

Sorry you're not getting what you want, but I struggle to think that more than a very small minority use a multi-monitor setup. There are clearly only a small number of posts in the forums regarding it -- there is a whopping 4 people in this thread using it (which isn't conclusive evidence, but certainly points that way). Claiming ED is a "DEI company" certainly isn't going to help your argument at all.

I doubt you'll get the option to get details in the extreme western part of PG map even if they fill those areas in on the Iraq map. Simple reason: PG is an old map and made with a totally different technology to what the newer maps are using. So there would be almost no benefit programatically from the fact that they had it in Iraq when adding it to the PG. Sure they'd have some of the details of what to add, but they'd literally have to recreate those part in PG, not just copy/paste them in.

They no longer have a deck crew because they couldn't run the old version on the Stennis along side the new full deck crew on the SC. As you said, this was mentioned prior to release.

The updated documentation is in the Supercarrier manual.

Are those missions based off the Stennis carrier? They removed the deck crew on the Stennis (temporarily?) since the new supercarrier deck crew conflicted with the old style system on the Stennis.

Pretty sure that's exactly what they said was going to happen if you used the new crew. After you park you should be able to relaunch.

I can't comment on this particular file, but I'll agree with MAXsenna that Kapersky is more a problem than solution as far as AV goes. Ssssooooo many false detections that how would you ever know it was real when it gave you a real one.

Short version is you don't have enough combination of memory (RAM) and pagefile: System RAM: 16293 MB, Pagefile: 2432 MB Ideally you should likely bump your RAM to 32 GB. Some of the patches over the summer pushed it past the point where 16 GB would work OK. Set your Pagefile to at least 32GB max and min as a starting point and see how you make out.

Your login and password for the forums ARE NOT the same as the game one (could be if you made them that way, but they are 2 separate things so being able to log in here has no bearing on being able to log into the game).

It's likely a legal dispute now. If it goes to court 6 years would be speedy, 6 months hardly gets the paperwork done to start the process. And I'll ask again: specifically what updates do people want from ED (or Razbam for that matter)? It's with the lawyers and I can guarantee they are saying keep it zipped. And if they weren't what would there be to share anyway? No one seems able to provide an answer to that.

They already said the version with the texture upgrade was going to replace the original version and also that the texture upgrade was going to be in this patch, so it's a pretty safe bet to say YES to those questions.

Are you starting in a shelter? If you don't have visibility to the sky for the GPS it will show IFA RDR until shortly after you leave shelter and it can get GPS signal.

Just a heads up for anyone changing the "winwing interval" setting in the wwtexport.lua file -- even with "Close the modification of export.lua" checked (and in fairness this is a different file to that), it will replace the original WW version of the wwtexport.lua on launch of SimAppPro. You'll need to set it to READ ONLY or your setting changes won't stick. For those who don't know, adjusting the winwing interval at line 19 in the wwtexport.lua in the saved games/scripts/WWT folder can increase performance by not checking for input/sending output to your WW devices quite as often. I suspect (don't have it so I can't say) that keeping this to the defualt of 0.03 might be important if you're using the stick shaker functions, but if you're just using SimAppPro for syncing lights on A-A/A-G buttons or display on the UFC you can change this to a higher number (0.3, 0.5, etc play around and see what works for you) to reduce any performance drag you might get from having SimAppPro running. Changing it may reduce your refresh speed on UFC etc, and if you get too high you might miss button presses, but mostly you don't need that precise of instant response anyway for the items it's used for.

That would be set in the AXIS TUNING in DCS bindings for that.

Did you have Massun's installed BEFORE it was added to core ED? That looks like you're getting IC fail too which could suggest that you still have the original mod version of Massun installed as well as it being in core.

Right, now that I think about it, the no zero's changed when they changed the colouring to match whatever it was over. So if you're over a friendly (green) target the alt/spd are in green and if you're over a hostile (red) target the alt/spd are in red (and same with ambiguous yellow). Logically this correct behaviour now (or at least logically to me). No reason for it to show the zero's.

No, it's just really slow cleaning things up and shutting down sometimes. Unless you're on MP it doesn't care about internet/auth server once it's authorized you for a session.

1st off: you need to be in the "airboss" slot (don't remember exactly what it's called) to be able to interact. Just changing the view to it won't let you change things. Would be nice if you could change heading etc without having to exit your current plane slot, but that's not the way it works currently. 2nd: from what I've read (don't use VR so can't confirm) it has issues trying to use it in VR currently even if you're in the airboss slot.

Post a track of that. Works for me.

Check that Windows isn't putting your USB ports to sleep. That sounds like you're losing your connection with stick and rudders.

That's very unfortunate. I can't say when I've last looked for a solution to a problem on my end. Yes there are actual DCS bugs that need an ED fix that pop up, but I'll echo Rudel_chw that I rarely come on looking for solutions.