Rongor

Thanks for the info!

Can't find any else. Where are the other dozens I would have expected? (Bought it yesterday...)

Why is PgUp working then? If the stop detent is preventing the twist grip from turning, it shouldn't matter which binding I try. Since PgUp is working and the throttle binding isn't, we face a binding problem here. Although addressed with the same function, PgUp(+PgDn) don't deliver the same functionality as the lever.

I put the Huey throttle on left throttle lever of my TM HOTAS WT. Since some time I am unable to use the axis until I used the identical keyboard commands PgUp and PgDn first to twist the throttle fully open and closed a single time. Only afterwards my throttle axis produces response. It is quite annoying to have to use the mouse or the PgUp/PgDn keys first to "unlock" the identical controls.

Please don't post weird statements like that again as this confuses other readers by upholding a false guess. Technically there doesn't mix anything. You solely buy a key. Whether you download your purchased modules via ED's website or have them installed by a DCS World version you installed in Steam is entirely your decision and has nothing to do with the option to buy keys in different shops. If you installed DCS World in Steam, the modules you bought in the steam shop will install automatically. If you installed DCS World by downloading it from ED's website, you will have to download the modules also at ED's, no matter where you bought the key. So obviously there is no mix.

M-3? What is this?

please upload and link a trackfile

How would I do that? Or do you essentially suggest to simply tell the clients in the briefing to not use autostart?

Title says it. Which setting do I have to use to force clients to startup their aircraft by the book and not abusing the gamey autostartup feature?

You can do this with ground units though.

DCS World is about flying high fidelity simulated aircraft. If you fly in hostile environment, you in most cases already have enough sides: yours and the opponents. Nothing else is needed. You anyway fly overhead Georgia all the time. What I wanna say is that the core of your wishes is simply up to your creative imagination. They don't have to be ingame.

You can't save anything.

And again your very much problem is that you put a lot of assumptions on the base of guess. Obviously you never even touched Prepar3d but surprisingly that doesn't prevent you judging it and even abuse your nonexistent knowledge about this definite MSFS successor to support some other wild guesses you deliver. Everybody capable of starting up a plane in MSFS can do so instantly in Prepar3d. There is nothing "too complex" in Prepar3D. It doesn't even feature rolling decks.;) Btw, I didn't know yet the US Navy flight schools being a benchmark for sim developing, thanks for this amazing discovery that sounds so unbelievable I just don't manage to believe it. Still very nice of you that you come up with some marketing/developing ideas regarding 3rd party (MSFS and OR) content. I would have expected ED being a company considering strategies like these on their own. Thankfully you now told them what they just couldn't figure out yet by themselves. I will cease to reply this thread now, this is just far too deep into a world purely made up by someone's own imaginations. Good luck with these fantasies though:doh: Happy new year!

Forgive me, I didn't read the whole thread, only the OP. Let me tell you: What you experienced in MSFS helos is far from realistic. Don't take it as a measurement. What you experience with DCS helos and the Huey in DCS is generally as real as possible. I never had a feel so near the reality like in DCS. MSFS is pure fantasy in comparison. The "pendulum" is experienced by many pilot students within their first steps in learning to fly a helicopter, it simply is the lack of feel for amount of needed control inputs and sense. It will vanish with enough training. Modern helicopters dampen these effects by SAS and other stabilization features. Not so the Huey. Train this, you will get better after a dozen hours, the pendulum will vanish.

I certainly don't think you have a clue of most of the stuff you posted. -There might be some synergetic potential with OR, but calling it "highly synergetic with the DCS market" goes way beyond the present impact which OR has on any market. DK stands for "developer kit" by the way. -"port existing map addons from MSFS" and "port existing high quality addons (flight models and cockpit) into DCS" is completely naive. 1. They aren't allowed to do that since they didn't own any rights or licenses regarding any MSFS content. 2. There are very rare MSFS addons of high quality (in a DCS aspect) 3. MSFS content is based on a basic program created in the 80s, the approach to simulate flying was completely different then. Todays computers in fact can calculate flight models while you steer them, back then in MSFS they couldn't do that. Those "flight models" in MSFS where nothing else then some tables with data which MSFS read to pretend some flight behavior matching the current flight attitude and circumstances. 4. We don't know how or when ED will implement a fully globe, so it is way too early to suggest how to fill this globe with scenery. 5. MSFS does in fact have a "replacement", it is the genuine successor Prepar3d of Lockheed-Martin, you can fin info on this sim here in this forum section I understand your idea of rolling decks. But I absolutely can't follow you when you declare this a "basic need". I say this isn't even a need at all. "Basic" would mean us having a carrier and a DCS module to conduct carrier ops from this carrier, these 2 are the absolute basic needs. Everything else might be nice to have but is certainly not required to commence carrier operations within DCS World. I don't know Whiting Field. So I am not able to understand the importance of this fact being mentioned by you. I apologize if my reply may be perceived rude. It wasn't meant offensive, just wanted to state facts with the same intensity of heart as you did in your OP.

Wow, a nearly 2 year old wishthread. We are still waiting even longer for ED to release this new graphics engine they announce every year again and again. But go ahead posting them details about carriers. They probably aren't aware of these.

Why all those shiny apps always aim for a first release to the iPad audience only is beyond my understanding. Cash rules. I guess.

This still is a simulation, not an adventure game. Live with it.

I still don't understand why it is too hard to simply tab out to windows, start your media player, tab back into DCS and go ahead. This "issue" is so easy to circumnavigate that it doesn't deserve any attention at all.

This is a ridiculous counterargument. Do you understand the purpose of a simulation?

They don't listen to music in the real bird for a reason... If you have to enjoy music while concentrating on flying this simulator, simply start your music player as a parallel application. Why on earth should developers waste time on stuff like that. Since there is no music in those simulated aircraft, there never should be music in the simulation.

Multicrew-Cockpit for Multiplayer please!

I am almost sure there won't be any further releases for Flaming Cliffs 1+2.

I confirm those switches can react buggy. But I don't see a real problem at this one, since when you reached a point when it is ok to switch ILS off, you will have managed a successfull landing already and so the lesson that tutorial wants to teach is learnt. Just don't bother with completing it. What matters is whether you understood how to land by ILS.

I don't understand your question. It is the first time a participant of this discussion provides us with the statement of that glide angle being correct. Thank you! Do you have any links or further insight on that topic? This would be appreciated, as some people might be interested.