gunterlund21

better yet, an update must be coming.

Isnt two seater a DCS world issue? I think Eagle has to set the standards for this first?

Looking forward to the L-39 which will be the only trainer I buy. 1. Help promote the front seat back seat development 2. Only jet to date that fought in the Russo-Georgian war outside of Russian aircraft (to my knowledge). If only we had the Mi-24 as well.

Fixed bug with ground units jumps to the bridge someone has to test this one. Is this too good to be true???

Look at dat. Right on queue!!

thinking the same thing. More modules must be on the way soon!

Edge looks good but not banking on it Been in development too long to worry about it. When it comes it comes. More interested in the L-39 and front seat/Back Seat. As long as that is not tied to Edge and we can see it in 1.2.11..... Im golden.

my guess is hellcat or wildcat WWII prop plane.

Really nice job on the interview. Brings a face to the project. Glad to hear about the Mig-23 in our future. Keep up the great work.

The media college instructions worked about unhiding the extension. Thanks.

followed the instructions. Still didnt get rid of the miz extension.

thanks tint. renamed the file with an exe extension but it still thinks its an miz file. Show file.exe.miz

how do you open a miz format. Tried winzip, WinRAR, and winamp. Winamp thinks its a midi file.

Does the low survival rate really come as a surprise to anyone. With increased realism comes increased complexity, and then top it off with a jet with technology that dates back to the 60's. I think we will find that even when the F-18 comes out (assuming its on the level as the A-10c), it will be cannon fodder for the Flaming Cliffs aircraft due to the difference in complexity. Locking targets, firing up weapons, tracking systems will all be more complicated than flying in the point and shoot jets of FC3. To find a fair server you may have to wait to dogfight the trainer low-tech aircraft like the Hawk or L-39.

glad to hear this. I agree the suspension right now is too stiff. If takeoffs were like this in real life I doubt there would be anyone left. I do like the idea behind this though. Keep up the good work.

Looks like we got our work cut out for us men!!!!!!! CONGRATS LEATHERNECK!!!!!!! I hope this becomes the top seller of all time!!!

nicely done ralf...cant wait.

I voted for at minimum a version that can carry the TOW to give the US/allies an offset to the Ka-50. G is just too old and not as relevant to the environment we have today. Unless they plan to roll out a whole Vietnam environment lets not lose site of the current campaign in Georgia in the near term.

Great update. Looking forward to the L-39 and front seat, back seat and will also be a new in theatre aircraft for Georgia. Also the F-18 but that will be a complex product to make with avionics more complex than the A-10C. The other jets not so much for me other than the Mig-21 which is a keeper. And not a peep about Combined Arms. That needs alot of work and I hope they don't foresake it. They need to fix the AI ground tracking desperately. Hope 2.0 will do that.

did flying with that fuel tank on one wing make any performance difference. I thought it might have ripped off in high G maneuvers.

please people back on topic. Koss take a chill pill, youll get it soon enough. If you dont like it dont buy future products. This arguement is moot and a waste of space. Im more interested in how this will do in MP against the FC3 planes. The point and shoot crowd will have a field day against this. Not stopping me be from buying it because I love the complexity, but will be a challenge.

does the pilot show an oxygen mask at altitude?

Agree with this assessment. I have no plans to purchase any WWII aircraft or trainer aircraft. If its an aircraft Im interested in, the delivery date makes no difference to me.

email sent

Also the walk animation is gone... back to seeing a kneeling infantry man skimming across the ground.