SkateZilla

VEAO Was 2, there were pre-orders taken for the P-40F

Court System, Is not limited to actual use of the Court Rooms, Trials, etc. But if we want to get technical, Mediation is prolly the accurate term for the current phase. Something like:

Suggest you google the definitions of Litigation. It's the Legal Process or resolving right's disputes. It does not always goto court. Both parties meet, with a legal representative from a legal firm. Most of the time Companies resolve their disputes in a conference room w/ a legal mediator. Or in modern / post covid times, on Teams/Skype/Video Conferencing Apps w/ Both Parties + the Legal Mediator w/ digital transcripts created for each session etc etc. If both parties were too busy shooting shots at each other over discord and social media and newsletters, nothing would be salvageable. there wouldn't bee any progress. ED being silent helps more than you know, they simply release updates stating as much. What do you want them to do? release a newsletter and have them post PDF transcripts of any conferencing sessions and attendence logs showing who doesn't show up and who does, who buys the krispy kremes and who buys the starbucks.?

Loose Lips Sink Ships. Even if ED was 100% the bad guy *(assuming, just to play devils advocate)*, RB and Associates contract breaches don't help their cause, nor the proceedings, nor the litigation, nor the resolution. It's like trying to end a fight with your spouse for driving your car, you say fine honey, lets settle this, and she/he brings up random events from 2 months ago, not applicable to the current fight, then calls you a broke deadbeat because you wont give him/her your debit card so they can goto the mall and buy things and you want him/her to pay for their own gas.

It's either the C-130 Mod or the Armed black hawk: Explanation: The reason the C-130 causes DCS to have a stroke when CJS Module is installed, is because the ordinance table is built using the new database names ie ("Weapons.Missile.AIM_120C") etc etc. and when the C-130 Mod tries to build it's ammo crates using a wstype that's a mixed string (integer and table name), DCS has already processed the CJS Ordinance table and shifted the database to the Type.SubType.Unit format, and therefore the wstype string containing both integers and table name is no longer valid, plus the weapon is already defined, as the CJS Mod Tells DCS to Process the Aircraft Weapons Pack first. For the C-130 Mod, the Problem line in the loadout lua file is 180 Ammo_Pallet_Contents({user_name = _("Ammo GBU-31V3B*6 [12949lb]"), clsid = "Herc_Ammo_GBU_31_V3B_bombs", contents = "{GBU-31V3B}", count = 6, mass = 981, wstype = {4, 5, 36, GBU_31_V_3B}})--GBU-31V3B The DCS Core function calls for a wsType of either 4 Stage numbers or the new format of 3 stage definitions, This line calls for 3 stage numbers then a table name, which DCS see's the table name as invalid due to a weapon already being declared using weapons.bombs.TABLE_NAME. So the Fix is to update the weapon wstype in the pallet's wstype, you can update it to use the new weapon wsType format: Ammo_Pallet_Contents({user_name = _("Ammo GBU-31V3B*6 [12949lb]"), clsid = "Herc_Ammo_GBU_31_V3B_bombs", contents = "{GBU-31V3B}", count = 6, mass = 981, wstype = "weapons.bombs.GBU_31_V_3B"})--GBU-31V3B

Chin Sensor on the Tomcat was trash, which is why it only lasted for a few LRIP runs of the A before being replaced by the TCS, The manufacturer touted an updated version, and it was added as a dual Chin Pod for the D, but was pretty quickly aerodyn covered off as they failed, or just left defunct.. Both cases and the IRST21 in the ASG-34A / FPU-13/A Tank, were the USN trying to add something to counter what Russia had, the Passive detection on the Mig-29s and Flankers. But face it, the system was better designed and implemented on those. slapping a cheap IR Sensor on the bottom of the chin or on the nose of a fueltank underneath the aircraft, makes it nearly impossible to detect anything above the horizon / nose line of the aircraft. and both configurations are at risk of ground debris damage

it'd be pretty weird because none of the tankers have the same light array layout.

Publisher

While the fuel will be usable in DCS, the sensor wont. But that being said, even Block II of this pod has been a rough development,... Ya know we told them not to put a sensitive optical sensor immediately behind the nose gear.... but do they listen? nope. Pay Attention to the STA (Station) Prefix in the description.

I own a studio / business. I am responsible for paying my employees and any sub-contractors I hire for a project. More often than not, they are paid before I ever see the payment for the final project. It's the equiv of me going after a production studio because I couldn't pay the artists that I subcontracted or hired. Their contracts are for my company to pay them, not the studio I accepted the contract from. This is why companies are required to have Insurance, company licenses, etc etc. I know fellow owners that took out loans to pay employees on time, and then paid them off once their contractual payment arrived. The only "Hickup" would be, if their contracts are stipulated to be a % of sales, which requires sales numbers to be shared to calculate payments to sub contracters, which have not been allegedly shared. ED Paying RB, does not and should not in any business structure, stipulate whether or not RB pays sub contractors.

that eyeball has a high maintenance and failure rate due to the design.

well the ASG-34 IRST21 is Technically a Tank w/ an Eyeball.

USN Never Flew w/ the Fairings, as they didnt purchase them, they re-used the launchers, but did not elect to pay for more covers.

This week on JetsOfLove: DCS....

They are AN/ALQ-249 Next Generation Mid-Band Jammers.