SkateZilla

#Classified

honestly the only things that need to be added are Angle Adjustment from Center, Right now 3 Screens (L - C- R) Viewports automatically assume the screens are 90 Degrees Offset, You can manipulate via the dx values, but in the end it would be easier to have a UI option to set the camera angle from center, FoV as well. I ran 4-Screens for over a decade before VR took over, and still run 3 Screens every now and then.

in gaming CL14 to CL16 wont be visible.. in benchmarks... marginal.

8700G will be slower due to higher TDP and lower PBO Headroom and no VCACHE. as other have mentioned already, it's an APU with 1060ti level GPU on board, but throwing 2 full size processors on one substrate (CPU+GPU), especially when running sims like DCS, you'd hit thermal throttling significantly easily.

Ohhh, MiniDV cam microphones are about 10mm diameter, the fact that you hear crackling and static the entire time, the microphone is clearly not capable. I dont think users understand what type of microphone is needed to get clear sounds from a jet engine. Shoot, when we were recording audio samples for Forza, (cars), we had to have 4 different types of mics to record engine sounds, turbo sounds, exhaust sounds, and transmission sounds alone. A Jet engine, you need a mic that can handle high dB, as well as High Freq. Range, but also need attachments to block wind / air movement noise, etc. Also, good luck getting a F-14A or B to get modern sound equipment near those engines. 90% of the developers use the same audio source (NASA has Both PWTF30 and GEF110 audio files recorded), and just re-filter/adjust the frequency to tweak the output. However even though they were recorded with decent mics, they were recorded in an enclosed room / hanger, so there is sufficient reverb noise. this is where LFE comes in, We need to wear vests with radial rumbles in it, so when ABs light, the LFE is translated to the vest rumble simulating chest cavity rumble.

We are all thinking it.. We need this campaign:

The TF30's on most youtube videos are sourced from VHS LP Tapes, If you prefer that, goto your audio control panel in windows and cut the audio freq. to sub 24Khz sample rate.

Considering the MFDs from Front Pit and Back Pit are likely cloned and not independent, you have 1 set rendering above the other.

you and everyone else that has any type of fetish for after burners and kenny loggins.

There currently isn't a public command to launch DCS directly to any of the internal (Preset 1,2,3) presets within DCS, which is why the app uses external presets.

I meant separating the A Versions and the B Versions. Before a B/U or D even enters the Frame there's already going to be 3 Versions Flyable (A-Early, A Late, B Mid). If HB goes the route of the D, it should be separate as it would be a vast re-write of code as a majority of the avionics have been completely changed. The amount of development work/investment to simply include it in a package that already exists, in hopes to re-coup the dev costs by sparking new sales of an old package vs a separate package and having 100% of the revenue go towards development costs. A B/U and D would be more than "a new HUD", Even on the B/U parts of the VDIG and RIO Tactical Display have been replaced, along with the Aircrafts main processors, Outside of the Same engines, it's a mid-step to the D, the USN used the B/U Program to get the fleet of B's closer to the F-14D and D/Rs. Because pilots rotating back were going from Digital Radars and MFDs to Analog Radars and old displays. Rooster's Reaction would pretty much sum up every pilot that flew D or D/Rs and rotated back to Bs.

That's part of being in the 70s/80s Navy...

you know you quoted my response from over 3 years ago, the plans have almost certainly changed since Nov. 2019.

B/U starting with OFP 317: FMC Upgrade, -WCP Upgrade -MDP Upgrade MIL STD 1553B Data Bus Upgrade * Required Both Processor Upgrades above to be integrated first, Pilot's VDIG were upgraded, RIO Tactical Display were upgraded, Both positions ECMD's were upgraded, Weapons Interface Computer Upgraded, After OFP 317, Integration of the LANTIRN Pod was started. It really depends on how far HeatBlur goes, a Full on D has nearly every thing replaced in the cockpits, tearing out a majority of the VDIG and replacing it with a MFD System, same for the Rear position

they kept maybe a dozen flying, using the other 55 or so airframes for parts. Outside of widespread use in the earlier wars, in the last 20 years they've been used as "AWACS" or they simply buzzed troops on the ground. Their tomcat's haven't been in a dogfight or pulled more than 5Gs in prolly a decade. The last aircraft that tried to pull a 7G break, was one of the newly retrofitted AMs, and it quickly crashed. another AM, Lost Hydraulics and both engines on Final in '22. So out of less than 10 converted to the "AM" standard, 2 of those had crashed, the Units selected for the "AM" upgrades were the best airframes they had. The only good thing to come from the "AM" program was an awesome new Asia Minor Splinter Scheme.

Note: the Navy is not in control of the information the DoD is via ITARS, the only data that is an issue is the IRST systems. Iran's tomcats are already being retired, their AM program failed, as did their retrofit plans. A B/U would allow HB to use the current external and cockpit model (w/ some changes), vs retrofitting a new external model and cockpit (w/ digital displays) for the D. The Sparrowhawk HUD is leaps and bounds better than the A/B Minimal HUD (Closer to the Hornet HUD), the B/U also has the upgraded databus for a few newer weapons and stores. The D would also required a Flight Model re-work, as other than the Digital Radar and supporting systems, the Flight Control System was also changed. So if you break it down between B/U and D Model: B/U: Uses existing External Model. (A few tweaks to pylons data busses and appearance). Uses existing Cockpit Model. (Upgrading to a off the Shelf SparrowHawk HUD Unit and VDIG) Uses existing Flight Model and Engine Model Uses existing Radar and Supporting systems. Updates and Code revision for the upgraded Digital Data Bus. (And SparrowHawk VDIG). All Data is available (if they can find it, for the Digital Bus changes and SparrowHawk/VDIG Upgrades). D : Requires Adjustments to External Model (Adjustments to Control surfaces, wings, Chinpod, Intakes and a few other small changes) Requires Adjustments to the Cockpit Model (replacing all of the Radar Displays w/ Digital Displays, plus VDIG). Requires Updates and Code Revision for New Kaiser VDIG, Radar Displays, MFDs. Requires Updates and Code Revision for New Radar Requires Updates and Code Revision for New Flight Control System. (and Engine Management System). Requires Updates and Code Revision for new Digital Data Bus. Data for IRST and a few of the upgraded Digital Radar Systems are still blocked from public release through ITARS So Minimal Reworking for a B/U, Or A lot of Reworking for a partial D. Which one is more financially feasible from a business standpoint.... I wonder.. The Tomcat Module Honestly could have been separate Modules, F-14A (Early and Late) F-14B (B and B/U)

if the App is launched as Administrator, then any child process it launches should also be Admin Processes shouldnt it ?

Just a quick blurb.. I do know there's still several issues with preset editor (and German Locale especially), Work continues on revising and re-writing the functions, but over the last 2 months I have been working 12-18 hr shifts every day. Once work calms down and I get more time off I will continue to develop these functions as well as others. I haven't gone radio silent I promise.

not through the DCS_Updater you can't. You can Create an Symbolic Linked folder.

The buttons were replaced with context menu in the last update. Right Click the Build Button to bring up the menu.

Oceana in the 80s and 90s was one big oil / hydraulic fluid stain, Oceana in the 2010's Plus is super clean.

Look at sat photo's of NAS Oceana's Tarmax in the 90s, then look at NAS Oceana today..

F-14s have both Hydraulic and Electronic issues off the line. All surviving US Airframes had the wing box cut...

Depends... Do you want Regular MAC or Deluxe MAC Complete with the liquid gold cheese sauce and better elbow noodles.

Per dev comments in interviews, the Chinook BARELY made it into that video, and it was 100% stationary art only, no systems or flight., which is why you've seen 'nought afterwards. None of the published content has been recorded in Vulkan.