Jump to content

Woogey

Members
  • Posts

    423
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Woogey

  1. Hey Pit, You have another customer waiting in line! lol It's funny how we all must walk a fine line between the real world, and the Digital one. I guess you could say that this hobby does it's best to merge the two together huh? Anyway, Very interested in a UFC. And any other panels you may build. PM me or E-mail me at P.Woog1@Gmail.com Thanks, Preston "Woogey" Martin
  2. X-plane sucks. The first thing I look at is accuracy. All of there aircraft look like crap. Whoever does there 3D modeling is not being overseen by QA. The shapes are all wrong. If only ED could get a "World Map" operational......... I had this idea to create this cloud covered world where as you purchase new map packs, these areas would be "unclouded." Anywhere that is open water could be left as a visible area.
  3. @ Antonov225 The Bering straights all the Way! I have posted this elsewhere in the forums, Alaska Vs. Siberia. Perfect classic battle map. Naval battles, open tundra, mountains, and forests. An energy crises fuels a battle for resources. Classic plot line. An as stated perfect for tactical airlifters.
  4. "The Med" I agree that the Med would be outstanding! On the flipside, a very large area with MANY cities, countries, and varied terrain. Nevada has taken so long, already, and it is one city and a dessert. Although I would love to see the Med, Maybe something a wee bit smaller, like say The Falklands? Maybe San Clemente and San Diego? Cuba and some of Latin America? I do like the Med Idea though!
  5. Back to the ole' Russia vs. USA fallback. I think a Siberia/ Alaska campaign should be high on the list of Future map packs. Just think from the modeling stand point, Wide open terrain with very little buildings to model. Small towns here and there on both sides. A couple "major" cities. There are Good military bases on both sides of the Straight. A naval campaign is very do-able. Oil fields to fight over, Natural resources. Tundra, Mountains, and forests. If Alaska as a whole could be mapped, cites, villages and refineries could be developed as third party/ userfile addons. General aviation traffic (Bush planes, and such) could be the first entries into the civilian market, (for an added sense of immersion). As an American, I would be very interested in exploring the Siberian countryside. Countless possibilities.
  6. I have not been able to successfully run DCS world. Although I have only tried a training mission. After clicking on DCS World single player, I have tried multiple time to go to the training section. Every time it goes to the loading screen, then nothing. I have the splash image with clouds and a HUD. I have loading music. However it never progresses past this point. The longest I have waited was 30 min. Any solutions?
  7. Could we just limit the downward travel of the VC view, so that it would not drop below the Canopy rail/Glare Screen? This way the 6 DOF would still work as intended, but without the redundant Panel.
  8. Scenery Request Although We would all like to have scenery for our corner of the world, I think realistic areas of conflict should be modeled first and foremost. Iraq, and Afghanistan are a givin, But my top picks have a little more interesting terrain. I have four different scenery/scenario requests: 1) Cairo-Suez Canal-Israel 2) Falklands Redeux 3) Siberia-Bering Straights-Alaska 4) Cuba-Florida. I also enjoy carrier ops, so this is a primary factor in my choices.
×
×
  • Create New...