Woogey

Yes a KC-10 & S-3 Viking will Refuel this bird. Is there a drogue version of the KC-135 in game anybody?

https://www.facebook.com/RazbamSims?fref=nf

Trainer Wars I can already envision the competition servers in action. Trainers only battle Royal. L-39 vs, Hawk, vs C-101, vs T-2C. Let the fun begin!

Any chance this could turn into a full module someday?

Sorry guys, I did not intend to go off subject, I was just responding to the information that WAGS touched on. By Naval Ops, I was referring to the updated U.S. Carrier with working catapults that WILL be part of 2.0 for the incoming Naval Aircraft. I am very happy to see movement on all fronts from E.D. Progress is good! The L-39 will be a great little addition, and seems to have been developed in record time. -Woog

Going to a DCS World 1.5 is a nice compromise while E.D. continues work on Multi-Crew, ATC, and the Naval Ops package that are to be part of the full 2.0 release. At least then the other developers can have a fairly stable platform to work in that represents how the new visuals will be presented. I can't wait to hear more when I watch the replay-stream after my return from Camping this weekend. Please WAGS, include the news portion in the replay. Thank you, -Woog

Hello NRG, I am from the Seattle area, but not Mukilteo. I actually live down south a bit near Lake Tapps. I work at the Boeing factory in Renton. Now you may understand my desire to see proper airliners at these International Airports. Also my proximity to McChord AFB put C-141's, F-15's, and A-10's over my home quite regularly as a kid. I think they use the distinctive shape of the lake as a VFR landmark.

Hello Friends, I see a lot of people have mods for things like new ships, and objects. How hard would it be to import new civilian Ai aircraft. E.D. has stated that these are very low on the priority list, but Dubai and McCarran will absolutely look odd, if you don't have A320, 737, 747, and 777 at the gates. Also on the Military side, I always longed for a C-141B Starlifter to match up with our FC3 era aircraft. How hard is it to add in these type of aircraft into the mix? There are a lot of freeware available with the correct liveries. If this somehow still breaks EULA's, I would be willing to purchase 3d models, if someone could help me get them into, and functioning in the sim. Sincerely, Woog

Which is exactly who they did fight. while serving with the Brits (Who are making both those modules) -Woog

Hey George, all valid concerns, however, I am not suggesting I make this. I am simply measuring the communities opinion on what they want. All Photoscenery is built upon a detailed elevation mesh, and should include accurate water masks. Because of this, it would still have mountains valley's rivers lakes, etc. If you read the post, you would get a better understanding of what I meant. Also, I am not suggesting I make this scenery, I am suggesting E.D. or a partner consider this as an alternate product to sell to us user base, to expedite scenery creation. That is all Good or Bad idea? -Woog

In order to increase the map size and expedite the process of map creation, would you support photoreal scenery without objects? I am thinking along the lines of MegaScenery for FSX/P3D. Of course detailed maps could be added on top, or as a later replacement. Would you buy a photoreal only scenery product for DCS World, if you could instantly fly over SoCal, or all of England for example? Just curious, because I would buy it in a heartbeat!

Hello Bunyap, Is there any way we could get the A-10A as an option for us newbs? (In addition to the Frogfoot) -Woog

Just to add a little more fuel to the fire, maybe one of the "2 other aircraft" is an F-111? A2G radar, Swing Wings, and the same engines as the Tomcat. Could have been used by the Marines, but never was......... -Woog

Hey SilverDragon, You are correct, the Export Hornets use the Same style MFD For the Center. The U.S. version does not. Does this really matter? To Me, the U.S. version should be the one that E.D. models, as it is the most prolific, and the Country of origin for the Aircraft. -Woog

Constructive Criticism: The center MFD on the Hornet is wrong. It should be Square not hexagonal like the top two.

The E-2 has been in game for a long time, along with the E-3.

Tanker Tie-in: I really hope that when the A-6 finally goes into production, that Razbam makes a Dedicated KA-6 version just for this purpose. On a typical mission scenario in the Turkey, after launching from the boat, the first thing you did was meet up with the tanker to to off your tanks. -Woog

I don't know why you would assume a minor incident like this would put a Highly valuable Tomcat out of commission. A new Canopy and an Ejection seat and he was good to go! 164341 seen 4 years later in the Bone Yard at DM. -Woog

I do have to agree that the A-6 shares a lot of cockpit gauges and functionality with the F-14A, recalling the "systems pioneered by one of our other Modules" statement.

Maybe they will be doing NAS Adak? Now a decommissioned airbase handed over to the local Alaskan tribes. Adak was once a thriving naval base and air station at the peak of the cold war. http://web.mst.edu/~rogersda/military_service/adak.htm

I think this probably means system wise it is complete, satisfactorily functioning as intended. More artwork still in the pipeline though. Just my interpretation though. -Woog

Kind of out of left field, but maybe one of the two unannounced projects is an S-3 Viking? It had A2G radar right? That would be awesome. The Viking has really grown on me over the years. I would build a full 100% scale cockpit of that bad Mofo, if one were created for DCS. -Woog

Yes, SoCal would be an Amazing scenario terrain. So many military bases. I know my version is a bit larger, but it also opens up the possibility of attack from south of the Border. IE CUBA, promotes an overthrow of the Mexican government through the drug cartels, backed by other Communist factions. Could make for some real interesting gameplay. Lots of open desert for combined arms operations. -Woog

VEAO have stated their intention to do a Libya map already on their roadmap. -Woog

If you were to scale the Extension that Nick has "Proposed" to fit the NTTR Map it would look a little closer to this: The Blue Line at the top of the Image is the NTTR Map border. This SoCal Extension would be useful for The F/A-18C at El Toro, the Tomcat at Miramar, and for Razbam's Harrier at Yuma when it is finished. If we ever get a Whiskey Cobra, Twin Huey, or a Phrog, those are all based at Camp Pendelton. NAS North Island, is home to SH-60's, S-3 vikings, and C-2 Greyhounds, Just for fun, look what I spotted out on San Clemente Island. (a Mig-23) -Woog