Raven434th

But In my case not enough as it is soooo yeah it just might be the magic I need...some say it is almost the equivalent to a next gen card upgrade

BUT, It would be nice if they made some sort of attempt to inform us that they are looking into it and what they have found out...as someone who's spent over a $1000.00(or there about) on their products, and double that to run it .. .I certainly have a dog in this fight. And if they have please show me where.

I hope this is possible as it would mean for me the ability to atleast run my 22 " monitor at 60FPS....and still look decent

what they really need to do is show us the development on vulcan...this might resolve all issues. Why keep us in the dark on such an important feature?

maybe because I have win 11 but haven't installed it yet on any machine and would like to know if there will be any advantages to do so...that enough for a discussion for ya?

ok makes sense now

What about win 11?

There's a tolerance setting in special settings for this

you can overide with the button next to the right of the observe button

Also people...check your axis in tuning for "spiking /stutter" I happened to go in and noticed this... when I checked the blackshark settings they were stable, no spiking. So I deleted the inputs for hind and they where back to normal. So something went wrong somewhere.

blade tip lights switch is reversed

Still broken

What is to be expected in pancake mode with a rig like that then?

That's bull... It's a factor for sure,,, joysticks get worn and sloppy, aspects of this sim (aiming the gunner sight in hind for e.g.)require a high level of precision.

nv

what is all that green stuff??...during explosion???

An I9 processor with a 2080ti and only 45 frames???!!!...THAT says alot about the state DCS is in...I was getting close to that with my rig on 2.50...(average 35-40 in pit)...on high

peoples setups are a BIG factor too...maybe we need a better way of "calibrating" our individual systems setups to DCS...Something more visual in the interface pertaining to each individual aircraft.

There's something wrong in the coding I think, cause when I removed the mouse zoom....the joystick assignment for zoom x3 stopped working all together...I had to re-assign it to mouse to get it to work again(the joystick assignment). I think the axis commands are getting confused...which also makes me wonder how all this is affecting other axis commands???

I think they need to build in some tolerance's to compensate for peoples hardware...ie type,age,ware,deadzones etc. It just too twitchy.

There's something wrong somewhere ,it sometimes moves when it shouldn't and doesn't move when it should.

I think there might be a problem with some people like myself where the helo is over whelming the processors with calculations(I suspect the autopilot stuff and all the clicky things a dual cockpit comes with)...making inputs lag. If you get below 24 fps ,it gets unmanageable. The black shark used todo this as well before it got tweaked. if you have a newer system your probably not going to see these problems. IMO this is a result of ED constantly uping the bar(or moving the bar) in terms of required processing power in either cpu or gpu. IMO they need to get that new graphic engine out ASAP.

after doing a first attack, the atgm site goes out of register, it won't face forward towards the target, it can be offset by as much as 45°.making it impossible for a re-attack

I'm seeing this as well