Krupi

Philstyle you might want to see this thread, especially Yo-Yo's comment. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4454175#post4454175 EDIT: Looks like you already saw it :thumbup:

From what I have heard the lenses of the original Reverb were the issue. The lenses in the G2 were designed with Valve and the lcd are not the same as the ones from the original.

Unfortunately I don't think ED have any plans to create any bomber, if you watch the video interview with Simon and the Grim Reavers they "discuss" (you will see, the Grim Reapers interviewer forces his opinion throughout the video unfortunately). Think the max we can expect to have is a two seater. :cry: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=282292 There is a lot of information to be heard if you can stick it, I couldn't personally...fortunately Eldur has captured everything in handy bullet points. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4440795&postcount=26 Silver dragon has made it easier to read https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4441093&postcount=1743

I think it was this interview https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4440028&postcount=1741 Or this one... https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4446881&postcount=1749 Sorry forgot to respond.

Unfortunately I don't think ED have any plans to create any bomber, if you watch the video interview with Simon and the Grim Reavers they "discuss" (you will see, the Grim Reapers interview forces his opinion throughout the video unfortunately). Think the max we can expect to have is a two seater. :cry: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=282292 There is a lot of information to be heard if you can stick it, I couldn't personally...fortunately Eldur has captured everything in handy bullet points. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4440795&postcount=26 Silver dragon has made it easier to read https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4441093&postcount=1743

The test data for the DB605AM at 1.8PS is shown on the graph at 1.7? http://kurfurst.org/Engine/DB60x/DB605_datasheets_AM.html So you can't make the assumption that GJ+FX is a G6 or G14 ideally we need the Wrk no.

Could you please point out where it states G14? Can we confirm that GJ+FX was a G6 or a G14?

Agreed

Might be useful, shows a DB605AS with MW50 http://kurfurst.org/Performance_tests/109G_DB-G6AS_wMW/DB_109G6_ASM.html

G6/AS is 1.4 not 1.8 DB605AS 1.435 DB605AM/ASM 1.800

The information below comes from Wiki so it will need to be verified and I honestly don't know how it compares to what we have in DCS right now... If you could feed in data from official sources that would be great l. "Using MW 50 and maximum boost the Bf 109 K-4 was the fastest 109 of World War II, reaching a maximum speed of 710 km/h (440 mph) at 7,500 m (24,600 ft) altitude. Without MW 50 and using 1.80 ata the K-4 reached 670 km/h (416 mph) at 9,000 m (30,000 ft). The Initial Rate of climb was 850 m (2,790 ft)/min, without MW 50 and 1,080 m (3,540 ft)/min, using MW 50." K4 with MW50 Top Speed 440mph @ 24,600ft Climb 3,540 ft/min K4 without MW50 Top Speed 416mph @ 30,000ft Climb 2,790 ft/min (I don't believe the climb rate is correct for the K4) Spitfire Mk IX(e) Top Speed 404mph @ 21,000ft Climb 4,745 ft/min G6/AS Late Top Speed XXXmph @ XX,XXXft Climb X,XXX ft/min G14/AS Top Speed 422mph @ 24,600ft Climb X,XXX ft/min Fw190 D9 Top Speed XXXmph @ XX,XXXft Climb X,XXX ft/min

+1 it appears he cannot grasp the simple context of what we want.

The irony here is hilarious, the 109K4 with MW50 is a UFO compared to the allied A/C. The only downside being it's maneuverability. If a pilot was patient the Spit would have no chance, most of my kills were from frustrating a K4 into a turn fight and even then it was a narrow opportunity to bring it down before the pilot realised he made a mistake and uses the immense speed to regain the upper hand. And is pathetic to try and goad people with childish attacks on flying skills. I have not been flying for the past few years thanks to a bust PC I can't imagine I would be much challenge for anyone right now, maybe when I have found my feet again lol

where, ah i see

no, it states no drop tank it STATES clean http://kurfurst.org/Performance_tests/109G14_May44trials/109G14_GLCE-may44_trials.html The tested aircraft appears to be in it's standard, 'clean' fighter configuration and does not carry gondola weapons (note 1x MG 151 + 2x MG 131). And is MN30 not MW50 I see no mention of drop tank

As i pointed out earlier the G14 Graph is clean http://kurfurst.org/Performance_tests/109G14_May44trials/109G14_GLCE-may44_trials.html ah you were talking about the ASM graph, i see

I think you missed my point here old chap! I was stating how the spit XIV vs a G6 is comparable in its ridiculous advantage to a K4 vs a Mk IX :smilewink:

http://kurfurst.org/Engine/DB60x/DB605_datasheets_AS.html "The design of the Daimler Benz DB 605 AS engine corresponded to the Daimler Benz DB 605 A engine model, but received a larger charger"

DB605A

G6 http://kurfurst.org/Performance_tests/109G14_May44trials/109G6_DB605A.html G14 (MW30) http://kurfurst.org/Performance_tests/109G14_May44trials/109G14_GLCE-may44_trials.html

of what aircraft? You have lost me completely

:thumbup: you are correct we should move this to another thread... one of the billions that have endured this fruitless endeavour endlessly :helpsmilie:

It is also comparable to the graph I posted that you stated was a G14 with Gondola & Drop Tank however the page I took the graph from stays nothing regarding a 300L drop tank?} http://kurfurst.org/Performance_tests/109G14_PBLeistungen/Leistungen_g14u4_am-asm.html

From the Kurfurst website the graph you claim to show has gondola & 300L drop Tank actually states "The tested aircraft appears to be in it's standard, 'clean' fighter configuration and does not carry gondola weapons (note 1x MG 151 + 2x MG 131)."

I apologise, I am doing this from my phone so I might have copied the wrong one. Unfortunately I don't speak German. I will update my post with the correct charts