The theoretical science have their paradoxes which should be accepted for what they are, that is unproven theories which are subject to change, like the evolution of the string theory and the evolution of the big bang theory.
However it’s wise to remember those scientists who laid the foundation for a lot of theories to become true facts.
I’ve seen enough of those TV programs and read some books to pursue my curiosity about this sort of nature and it answers as much as much as I want to know otherwise it’s a never ending sequence of questions
I’m going to try and write a layout of my own observations.
The concept of multiverse and parallel universes is different from one another that is to say that the multiverse is the collection of universes like our universe on a much larger scale whereas the idea of parallel universes is based on the extra dimensions.
It has been evident for some time that particles like photons and electrons can exist in more than one place at the same time and as an example to understanding the parallel universe is to imagine your brain which is responsible for your decisions and actions and that in turn is influenced by electrons in your brain cells, the very same electrons which can exist in multiple places at the same time (spilt personality? No not that) it basically means that if you decide to do some thing in this universe, it may not be the same in the parallel one and that’s where the splitting of universes occurs, (I didn’t invent this example it was described like so in one of those TV programs not the best example I‘d say) flip a coin if it‘s 50/50 the mathematics can take you to some level (not that I‘ve never tried to flip a coin, again bad example to use a coin for understanding the theory, not that I comprehensively understand it, but has any one seen exactly 50/50 phenomenon in this universe?).
Lets look at our universe from a perspective with the aid of wormholes and all that.
According to that theory it is possible to go far beyond our galaxy or even time and the question is why not before the big bang? That is to take your measurements and get out just in time before it kills you because it is defined as an explosion and a micro second of such inflation would have the creation of matter and anti mater annihilating each other with trillions of degrees (no chance looking at it and recording your findings).
How about the variable speed of light theory for the big bang expansion, it sounds good today whilst looking at the most distant galaxies and wondering how did they get there faster than the speed of light at some point and instead of slowing down they speeding up.
Look at this theoretical scenario:
The two objects travelling close to the speed of light in the same direction 300 miles apart (no one give a fuc and all that)…
But what if they truly go with the speed of light, their time would freeze and yet I can measure the distance but they don’t know about it because nothing changes for them until the impact.
I would write the theory of nothing but I need another day.
‘’Lost II’’ series?