monotwix

Well it’s not about some books from 10 years or any subsequent pieces of information I obtained from media to be used as evidence for interstellar travel, in fact I can speak of nonsense but the idea is about the architecture of thought to perceive the reality by all available means. For me it’s highly unlikely to see a government spend billions on the interstellar travel because it’s not practical to invest in at least 140 years ahead time for an uncertain outcome even if a spacecraft which can reach 0.10 speed of light, note at this time it hasn’t even surpassed its experimental stages. (not practical and unrealistic to go to the nearest stars if it takes 1000-100 000 years) Remember when I mentioned about the discovery of coil and magnet, the ability to control electrons and consequences? I this case of given probabilities I would bet on the unknown rather than the known facts. That’s to say we still don’t know enough about nature and possibilities to make conclusions. The reason behind the non-locality in this subject suggests that even if you reach a solar system in 70 years and be able to receive information instantaneously instead of 140 years, it would make it more feasible hence practical to launch a spacecraft. Some sources produce different results about instantaneous communication but what is widely acceptable and widely debateable is still in its exploration stages and I’m not limiting my thoughts to underlined types of information and I‘m not confusing the two. http://bpramana.tripod.com/uut03.htm

In this case I’m gonna stick to the propulsion, no locality is a solid stuff not a bla bla, (universe expanded faster than v-light and some define space as negative energy and matter as positive energy in physics, unrelated to comments) I’ve also discovered somehow that the entanglement is an expensive process. That's what I call 0 relavance.

No the point is: can you find the information on the net about experiment that can slow the speed of light through a medium to 3 metres per second and then restore it back to 300 000km/second?

About 10 years ago I red a couple of books about the physics history and it got me thinking, after that it was about gathering information packets and I’m not confusing A and B, the B experiment worked. Perhaps the slowing down of speed of light to couple of metres per second would come as a surprise. I'm not changing the subject.

That’s lazy, do your own discovery.

Well that’s the point, it took time and experiments to discover electrical current and then voltage to put it into energy and practical use.

Information transfer, I believe it’s practically proven fact.

MODERATOR NOTE: This thread is a split from thread: Planet found orbiting Alpha Centauri B In order to not have two perpendicular discussions ongoing in the same thread. --- Think of non locality, the phenomenon that actually works, doesn’t mean it’s going to transport all the matter particles from A to B but it wouldn’t have to if you have control of it. Philosophically, if you are a person on the moon and I’m the person on Mars and we have two enticed particles which are linked with non locality, whatever I do to my particle you will detect instant reaction in your particle. What does that mean after all? Well out of 250000 years of human existence it only took 100 years to learn how to control the electrons.

A fixing can be screwed.

I don’t think that the interstellar travel by means of propulsion in terms of equal and opposite reaction will ever be a breakthrough. Even if you reach the speeds close to the speed of light and age slower without impacting cosmic dust, that achievement would worth a try but still a peanut.

Basically it could be another route to the taxation of entertainment, the entertainment which can burn a lot of energy with the increase of technology and gaming. 300W card + CPU + everything else = 1kw heater + the lighting + the actual heating = electricity prices go up but a CPU doesn’t ring a bell to the old pensioners or those in need of warmth. No laws will discriminate the age but the tax will find its route.

Might be lucky to get KA-52 with that dl speed.

Did you write that? Like before today?

My believe,FC-2 or FC-3 is a good play dough for many pilots regardless of skills which could cover a wide range of interests. I’m I gonna fly it? I don’t know.

INB4 could be a post code for all I know.

Same here, check FOW box in the options menu for it to work.

Joey45/P-51 ace, that would be good.

C4 explosion

A F**C4 flight dynamics works.

AT-802Ued first and P51-oned

B1 has whiskers and C-5 has how many green gear lights on its panel?

They lunched submarines and Cuba fleet from the north, they could launch a football field from there but it wasn’t in their plans to float in Mediterranean.

It’s a sensitive subject because whenever someone decides to post some feedback he is usually welcomed with do it yourself reply. If there was a decent option to choose from then perhaps this thread wouldn’t exist and to have a closer look at choices it often looks something like this: 14-20 open servers, 32 players in total, 10 in one server, 6 in another, 2 or 3 or 0 in others. Quite often you join a server and see people popping in and out, 30 min later it’s a new team. Let’s have 100 servers, is it gonna increase the number of players? I recon that’s the point of this thread. I also have logged time creating a mission but that doesn’t pass my quality control easily, in one instance it took me 2 hours to find a place for a FARP only to realise later that MRLS can fire at it from 30km so the front line was moved to 50km, a bit of a stretch for KA-50 but I wouldn’t try to make a suicide route for them. Ofcourse it’s easy to dump SU-25T on the map and say get on with it, but the better option for it would be to fly to point and receive instructions or read the static task in the briefing. One can put many SAMs in or near forests in which case a safe flight route must be opened by ground forces and no-fly zones should be clear to the pilot.