monotwix

As producer of this post I identified the start, the middle and the ending of this post. Speed X Speed's computer = complex loop process

WWII was a mess, many decades ago. Take an infrared camera on a police helicopter for example, you can’t mount a surprise attack at night any more or mislead the reconnaissance data. Artillery can launch self guided missiles from miles away and even guided artillery shells for close support. Electronic and technological countermeasures are evolving, the thing which retains aircraft, submarines and infantry in their places.

Guaranteed quality stamp.

What’s the name of that ILS thing when the ILS approach is offset by more than 3 degrees from the runway angle? It’s like following ILS on 160 and then landing on runway 180? Not that I’m interested at this time but it’s nice to know that you could be doing an ILS approach and then observing your landing strip in your side window.

That is nice example for example. Do you like it? Sense of attitude

What other instrumentation could possibly top FPV? Hmm.

I had a bad habit looking at the HUD in this track, there’s nothing to see through the HUD but I kept looking, it’s because one of those things where some pilots are more proficient with digits and others are more proficient with dials. In the end it’s easier to fly looking down at the engine needles than observing stars if you like. I didn’t like the circles on final though. IFR attack.trk

That was written in September 2001 about something from decades ago and to build a MIG-31 or TU-160 avionics model from that data is .. is .. OO0. Double O zero.

IRS/INS based Terrain Avoidance system, how did that happen?

CA is great, once you take control and responsibility for ground units it becomes your cockpit, the intensity can be that of air to air battle.

You see? If a helicopter doesn’t rescue something, it can’t fly normally.

Can’t hunt normal Swedes any more, they are protected species.

People that get caught with their pants down,. Beware, it's coming.

A TV missile is only there to film the nature, it can only do one take even with the best actors. Does it ring a bell about reconnaissance missiles?

Will you operate the ground battle for goodness sake?

Don’t say that, a massive effort had a lot to do with it to with it to raise the chances.

Passengers safety depends on regulations and airline’s policies which reflects on pilot’s performance and decision making. It’s not unique to any particular regional flight. Never get tired,.. the policy which didn’t exist prior to this crash for regional flights.

XP=+, Vista=-, 7=+, 8=- and so on…

Yeah LHC may not be the best example but I was trying point out how important the unknown is, it worth billions of funding. You cant just turn to government and say I want 8 billion euros because I don’t know something, you’d have to convince everyone that the generated information could worth billions and if you tell them the information results will arrive 140 later, they will tell you to go away. I think that’s my assumption anyway but again may not be a good example. When you launch a telescope into space you simply don’t know what you are going to find but the chances are good that you will find something the same can not be said about 1000 years of interstellar travel, the chances are also good that people will know more stuff in 300 years and I would bet on that.

Niels Bohr said we all part of the same system and cant I see a paradox in sending information instantaneously you not sending matter, would a theory suggest that you would go back in time using warp drive.

I suppose you can rip the sentences out of context and break them down as you like, it’s your joy but you will not understand the relevance. You also mentioned about the source of information being hilarious, well it’s not a proof of concept, I only googled it but what it says about the particle A and B is more or less the same as what it says in the 10 years old book I’ve found. It shows the experiment of the two photons being fired in opposite directions through switches and filters and whatever happens to photon A also happens to photon B, so I understand that the separation speed is twice the speed of light and yet photon A knows what photon B is doing. Was that experiment a failure or was it disproved by another experiment? So that was in 1982 but that wasn’t the only one, similar experiment was conduced by John Clauser at Berkeley in 1978. Do you really suggest that I should get all the books and begin the study? I didn’t exactly say we should bet on the unknown. In 200 300 years people would face the same problem if it takes 1000 years to reach for the nearest stars and another 1000 years transmit a message. How likely is it that some one will invest in 2000 years 300 years from now? In this day and age I can make assumptions based on my opinion and current probabilities and I would bet on future possibilities rather than current facts, for me to see someone invest in 2000 years program is as likely as warp drive. If that’s crazy assumption then I rest my case.

Let me tell you something.. Betting is not silly at all, if you already know the outcome it’s not a bet. What you do is, you make assumptions and build a Hadron Collider, it’s not a bet but an investment in information. I hope you do realise that our world is composed of invisible reality. Furthermore can you actually comprehend the meaning of experiment by Alain Aspect that produced a physical proof to resolve the 50 years of EPR debate?

I want more toys, and soon,.. a train a plane and tank.

I’ve never seen a fin miscalculate, always lands in sauna.