I enjoyed the session and what Wags said about the development, that was good indeed, then towards the end the guys asked some questions and that was sort of OK, or they had run out of questions,..
As it was mentioned the DCSW is a constantly evolving platform and I can see it is deeply immersed in the development of systems and environment and the purpose of not only to satisfy the interests of a particular top gun group but also the new pilots or some other interests.
Let’s review some other interests for a sec, since we’d like to see the aviation community growth.
I haven’t clocked any physical numbers in terms of statistics that would show the popularity of heavy jets or props, but the youtube and avsim sort of shows it, yet the heavy jet flights in DCSW weren’t even mentioned.
I have many hours in FSX and LOCKON and subsequently DCS, my collection of heavy jets looks like this: PMDG-373, PMDG-j-4100, Level-D767, CS-757,CS-767,CS-C130,CS-b727,MD-80-PRO, IRIS-Vulcan.
There is definitely a market for heavy jets and what’s the prospect for these flyers, little jets, come on,..
I’ve squeezed the trigger and flew plenty of times but I can’t come to terms with the canopies and wracks on a runway or left and right sides of runways for take off’s.
I did gunzo and that was good, being at sea I’m a happy swine, so maps.
How much map does one need to make a naval fleet, I’ll tell you: a 20km island and a very good sea, a bobbing carrier.
Oh, thank you very much ED for the CA, some people thought it was inappropriate to have such thing a couple of years ago and even the ideas of having an older aircraft was dismissed in many ways.
And of course thanks for all the other works.