-
Posts
503 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Skjold
-
Leatherneck Simulations Mini-Update - SEPTEMBER 2015
Skjold replied to Cobra847's topic in Heatblur Simulations
Been checking the forum religiously since late june... C'mon LN! -
Actually no, that 3D model has been in for quite a while.
-
Yeah they are not finished, but as McBlemmen said they are in the neutral tab. As far as i can tell, the only aggressor skin available is the desert-y one of the Eagle.
-
I think we should add every single livery of every plane to this faction, as we now have a faction with every single unit (ground and air) in the game. This is mainly just to give more options to mission builders more so then anything else. Alternativly, making USAF Aggressor schemes for all modules and AI planes would be nice but not very realistic. Thoughts?
-
Agreed 100 %, a proper fragmentation model would make unguided weapons much more potent and fun to use!
-
[NO, VERY BAD IDEA] Model visibility - please add Extra large option
Skjold replied to grunf's topic in DCS Core Wish List
I am 90 % satisfied with air spotting currently, but ground spotting still leaves room for upgrades. -
Yes actually, if you'd use the late A's that would be fine. The A's did not have AMRAAM capability until 1999 (hence Rb 99) and i think the C's started to enter service less then 3 years later, in 2002. In fact, they only had Sidewinder capability up until 1999. I'm also fairly sure the official entry to service was 1997. This is going completly off-topic however, lets talk about how DCS: Wright Brothers plane is the next LN module.
-
As a swede, i would love it. As a realist, i don't see it ever becoming a reality, except maybe the A variant but that things capabilities were somewhat of a joke. (partly why the Viggen's remained in service so long until we could get the Gripens up and running to specs) To get the proper modern multi-role jet you'd need a JAS 39C version and that thing would be extremly fudged and simplified to the point where i -> personally <- don't really see the point (á la VEAO Typhoon) On topic: The russians really do need some love, noit counting the FC3 stuff their selection is and will be extremly limited. MiG-23MLD in the future would be awesome.
-
I think now its the best time for the announcement
Skjold replied to assafm25's topic in Heatblur Simulations
Well cobra officially stated that the announcement was delayed, but that the planes was not. Yeah i can't wait for both announcements! -
Just FYI, the AJ and AJS versions of the Viggen is dedicated air-to-ground versions with ground targeting and ground following / mapping radar plus thrust reversers. It also has extremly advanced avionics for its time. But yeah don't get me wrong, i'd take a Tornado anyday!
-
My bad, i had no idea that they were employed on the MiG-21. Is this bomb new on the 21 becouse i don't remember seeing it? You can close this report.
-
Iam well aware, it turns into a Marder IFV with the 20 mm autocannon.
-
The MiG-21 seems to be able to carry BL755 british cluster bombs on its inner pylons. Edit: Should have read the manual, lapse of judgement after way too many hours of 1.5 in a row.
-
The corpse of both Roland ADS and EWR is a Marder IFV, just noticed that.
-
This might have something to do with it. The MiG-21 module in the module manager has "no key" if you check its serial, even after me double checking and enabling another key to my profile manually. I tried the registry fix and other means, but no luck. Edit: The ED website is clearly stating that my profile owns MiG-21 and that it is activated (last activation is today infact) but the game thinks that i don't own it. Edit2: Forcing the DCS_updater.exe to install the module via command prompt worked for me. The module manager now shows a serial key.
-
ramazoti, we have no clue what you mean. Your title suggest that you are looking for the geographical location of Egypt and the actual text in your post suggests that wherever that may be, its not there in DCS yet. Did you mean "Why wasn't Egypt added previously to DCS World?" Maybe "Why isn't the MiG-21 available for Egypt in-game?" Just guessing here...
-
Guess i didn't read enough of that thread or my memory failed me then.
-
I personally prefer the new ones becouse i do use Target software for the TM Warthog, but i'm fine with either or. Also, there was a thread about this on the MiG-21 forums for several months and they announced well in advance that they were gonna switch to toggles after that thread came to a general consensus that people wanted the change. Now the opposite camp woke up and is demanding the opposite.
-
They look amazing, the DDR one and the two egyptian ones. Can't wait for more to come out. The MiG-21 also needs to be added to Serbia, Finland & Egypt in-game, but im not even sure thats something on your end so can't complain.
-
I have visibility range set to ultra, pre-load range maxed out, enlarged model visibility but i can't seem to notice any real difference. I've done quite extensive testing both in aerial dogfighting and in ground pounding. What is your experience? is it just my eyesight that is THAT bad?
-
[CLOSED] MIG-29 Speed while stationary.
Skjold replied to mattebubben's topic in DCS: Flaming Cliffs
Im not sure it this is related, but the Su-25T shows a constant 80 km/h while stationary or moving below it. I'm not even sure it's a bug. -
Came to report this aswell, hopefully it will be fixed!
-
No, SAAB 210 Lill Draken confirmed!
-
YAY! Now to wait for official release.