Renato71

No, no, not like that. I mean with less tubes to start with. Only 4 tubes (loaded), and no empty. There are pics with only 4 tubes, but for Petes sake, I can't find it right now :mad: And another wish that I forgot to mention: IR missile guidence - no interceptions, only tail chase.

Sorry, I was out at lunch... Tu-16P, version for electronic recce/surveillance. Some sources have it as Tu-16E (or subversion of P).

Darn, you are good! Yup, Mi-8 Your ball :)

Had unfair advantage - I've seen one IRL. OK, I hope this one will take at least 2 attempts Hint: I took the pic :D

PZL Swidnik Sokol W-3

Excellent :) Your turn...

Did you turned the electric power on? Is HUD working? What keys you have assigned to control flaps?

Thanks. As this is the first one from one, I hope it will be quite easy, therefore no hints until later on :)

Good morning and welcome: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=851437&postcount=3 (among others, no need to redirect to other place that will redirect back here)

And, it is down! http://lockon.co.uk/

Agusta A 106

I guess cos it should be in Forum and Site Issues, not under Lock On > Help Desk?

There are pleanty of LOMAC to be found on ebay, simply search for "lock on" under video games...

Don't jinx. I'm hoping for tomorrow :D

Crap, just realized... Has anyone asked for half Vikhr loadout? Like 2x4, instead of 2x8. Sometimes there is no need to carry 16 missiles, and they make huge drag.

CRAP! CRAP! And I thought it was "improved"? How many vehicles are you talking about? Static? Moving? Sorry to ask, but ka-50 is a bit boring to me and never bothered to play much or follow DCS section (apart from some stuff).

Never spent much time in DCS. Are you saying that it crashes more then FC112?!? What about lagging issues?

I have slightly damaged hearing (no joke) and I have to turn the volume up to the max. But, then it gets so screeching and distorted, it is very hard to understand :cry: Even so, from a sound quality viewpoint, it is horrible. Please, remove "trainstation" effect :cry: If those video will be distributed as training tracks in FC2, I hope one will be able to turn the voiceover off. Was that an option in FC1? Never went through those tracks, to be honest.

Dude! One thread next to this one, and you missed it???

There is something mentioned in those youtube videos. Check them out, but read the comments (voiceover has bad audio) ;)

I agree - its unbelievable!

I guess it was discovered in last minute that some nuts on the BTR-70 rear axle hubs were M20 instead of M24? Time and money discussion? I'll give 100 USD if SAM and damage models were fixed, and even more if it will be playable in multiplayer. Under playable, I mean stable and reliable and easy to connect as IL2 at least. Time and money? Comparing to cars? There is some competition in vehicle industry. ED has no (professional) competition for decades. Expensive or cheap? If you are willing to pay more, feel free to donate into a fund for people from midworld countries. If Russians will have to pay lower again on account of some raccoon excuse, that sucks more then any price raise. Maybe so, but I have pay-tv, cigarettes or booze AS WE TYPE/READ this ;)

I like this part: And, I do not mind to pay 29.99 USD. And, I hope that Russian customers will finally have their chance to contribute to the same extent as we are doing it :D PS - what about the date? price upgrading needs something to soften the pain :smilewink: PS2 - I have no plans to buy G940 ar anything else, but I will take donations. Baby diapers are priority.

Somebody will think that I'm party pooper, but voiceover sound is horrible in those videos :( I've just checked out and it sound like that distorted PA on rail station. Also, I can barely hear the voice over environmental (external) sound. If I turn up the volume, it sound like someone is yelling and still can't understand a thing :( I appreciate the effort to create a feeling of an instructor over radio, but I rather be able to understand it. Why not sound like in Wags's editor notes on Ka-50? That was very comprehensible (and friendly) voiceover.