mytai01

What really needs to happen is a fully developed AI ATC that responds appropriately to the situation...I suspect it will be a challenge to make one. As an air traffic controller myself, I might not want to see one that can do my job properly...;)

As a purchaser of the Hawk, I'd prefer an original work!

Since the Hawk is dead, it would be nice if another company picked up the aircraft and made a T-45 Goshawk for basic Naval Aviator Training...;)

You have to fill out the real world mission paperwork like the real pilots do...;)

Like the title says! Make it happen in DCS...

Below is a link to a PDF on the above topic...enjoy! It has basic topics that apply to more advanced aircraft (ie. F/A-18C). https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.cnatra.navy.mil/local/docs/pat-pubs/P-1209.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjPxduNj5LgAhXiN30KHbi-DaQQFjACegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw3e3BAWE9sobIubLlZpqs8m

I'll bet the release date slips past January...;)

Sometimes I wonder if some people do think that!

All of the aircraft are based on publically available information. Nobody is handing ED classified system information and radar capabilities in game are no different. Public information and good guess work is all that you'll ever get!

http://characterisationexplosiveweapons.org/studies/annex-e-mk82-aircraft-bombs/ Above is a website on the Mk. 82 General Purpose Bomb. Is anything like this used to model the effects in the game?

I cut out a piece of 1/8 inch sheet steel (5" x 14") and used U bolts to secure it to the cross bars on the bottom of the seat. At first I just mounted the joystick to the plate, but that was too low. So, I mounted 4" floor flanges and a 4" length of pipe. The hardest part is aligning and drilling out the holes in the flange to fit just right. I had to file some holes for better alignment. I also used a counter sink to make it possible to use the original joystick screws on the flange. All cuts and holes were made with good power tools. Dremel Saw Max and Milwaukee 1/2" drill...Oh the power!!!

My modified Air Force Playseat...

They are ForBowden!!! Spoken with English accent...;)

If you're going to do ships, then I'd suggest a real world fleet module. A Gator Navy fleet and a Blue water Navy fleet rather than a single type of ship.

If they released stuff that is totally complete then you'd have to wait 2 to 3 more years. Is that what you want?

I specifically mean a "Falcon 4" style of setting in the game.

I'm using Open Beta exclusively. I can't get them to work off the F/A-18C.

They can be dropped as dumb bombs, but what a waste of resources...????

Types of terminal attack control: Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 There are three types of terminal attack control (Type 1-3). JTACs use Type 1 control when the risk assessment requires them to visually acquire the attacking aircraft and the target under attack. Type 2 control will be used when the JTAC desires control of individual attacks but assesses that either visual acquisition of the attacking aircraft or target at weapons release is not possible or when attacking aircraft are not in a position to acquire the mark/target prior to weapons release/ launch. Type 3 control may be used when the tactical risk assessment indicates that CAS attack imposes low risk of fratricide. Since both fixed- and rotary-wing CAS aircraft are ever changing, standardized tactics provide a baseline for further refinement and improvement. Aircrews will ultimately decide aircraft tactics but must ensure that tactics used fall within any constraints issued by the JTAC. CAS operations in limited visibility or adverse weather conditions demand a high level of proficiency. Such proficiency can only come about through dedicated, realistic CAS training. The three general categories of limited visibility employment are visual, system aided, and night vision device. Technology can assist in effective CAS. Laser and inertial navigation systems and/or global positioning system based systems can aid in target acquisition and weapon guidance. CONCLUSION This publication provides joint tactics, techniques, and procedures for joint fire support and aviation planning, execution and control agencies, and aircrews in fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft to attack targets in close proximity to friendly forces. It presents options the JFC (Joint Forces Commander) can employ when planning and executing CAS in joint operations.

The following scenario provides a step-by-step example of how Type 3 control would be used in a situation where the tactical risk assessment revealed a low risk of fratricide. — The supported commander has just been informed that a reconnaissance team has spotted a company of mechanized infantry approaching 15 km to the north. A very discernible river conveniently separates friendly forces from the enemy. The commander and staff are confident in friendly force disposition and the common operating picture provided through sound battle tracking and recommend CAS aircraft be employed. A division of AV-8s is currently in the stack and has sensors in the target area verifying the recon team’s sighting. The decision is made to authorize Type 3 control and attack the mechanized company. The following 9- line is provided: JTAC: “Razor 11, this is A3C, Type 3 in effect, advise when ready for 9-line.” Attack Aircraft: “Roger, Type 3, ready to copy” JTAC: MAZDA 360 Right 9.0 450 Mechanized Company in the open NB 922556 Laser 1111 Southeast 3000 Egress S to MAZDA, Attack Aircraft: “450, NB 922556” JTAC: “Remarks to follow. Razor 11 you’re “cleared to engage” from time 45-55. Execute attacks North of the river. Cobra recon team is currently 3000 S in position to lase. Contact him this TAD. Report attack complete.” TOT 45-55 Attack Aircraft: “TOT 45-55” Attack aircraft establishes communications with Cobra recon team. Cobra recon team: “Razor 11 your target’s estimated to be a mechanized company of BRDMs and BMPs with dismounted infantry. Your target is located on the north side of the river, 100 meters west of the bridge. Report “contact” the bridge.” Attack Aircraft: “A3C Razor 11 is “contact” the brown suspension bridge, and a large staging area just to the west that appears to have multiple vehicles parked in rows.” Cobra recon team: “Razor 11 that’s your target, wind in the target area is light and variable, designator target line 270, final attack heading 300 to 320, laser will be on the southern most vehicle, confirm laser code 1111 and report IP inbound.” Attack Aircraft: “laser code 1111, Wilco.” Cobra recon team provides terminal guidance using standard terminology. JTAC: Monitors progress of the mission via radio. Attack aircraft make multiple attacks within the time window. Attack Aircraft: “A3C and Cobra, attacks complete at time 55” Note: The JTAC maintains abort authority in all cases. While recent technological advances in weaponry and digital/data link systems have provided significant enhancements to the CAS mission, it is imperative that commanders and operators fully understand the capabilities and limitations of the systems being brought to the fight. Descriptive dialog between the JTAC and aircraft will often provide the best means of mitigating risk and producing the desired effect on target. It is essential that standard procedures and terminology be used by all CAS participants. ref: Joint Publication 3-09.3 "Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Close Air Support (CAS)" 3 September 2003

Ah! Then I'll try it on the A-10C and see if that works. Thanks! UPDATE: It turns out that it does matter what the development state of our aircraft are in. The F/A-18C can't do proper LGB's yet!

F/A-18C Lot 20...

I'm carrying LGB's, but my pilot just reports them as "bombs" to JTAC. What's wrong with my setup???

I forgot about Chuck! That maybe the first Combat Sim I played. It was my friends sim though...;)

The F-15C radar has gone through a lot of upgrades and changes. They could use an earlier version of the radar that isn't so classified. I'm sure that the F/A-18C radar has classified capabilities that will never be seen in DCS...