Jump to content

OxideMako

Members
  • Posts

    384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OxideMako

  1. NVM then! Thought only the L-39 had that notice till recently.
  2. Uh this looks new: Requires DCS World version 1.5 or 2.0! Here:https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/m2000c/
  3. Also, I updated from 5.2.2 - I could not use any of my old profiles with 5.3. So no point for myself at least to upgrade. Back to 5.2.2 and they all work again. Just a friendly heads up.
  4. That would be a better interim solution, but I would have to wonder if the work to get that working would be almost as much as making the interrogator functional. So yes, I would love to see some confirmation if there will be an interim IFF solution, or there will simply be without it until the interrogator is implemented. (We could always work around it if that is the case, AWACS DECLARE and RAYGUN work for Falcon 4 which has no IFF, but it would be less than ideal.)
  5. Any of those going to involve the ol' Red Flag?:music_whistling:
  6. Nah, they: So late next week given ED's track record with this sort of thing, and Russians don't have Xmas till the 7th Jan they would likely still be working. Unlike the rest of us at home waiting for the Mirage!:D
  7. Picture updated with ENT/HFR/BFR:
  8. Slightly updated picture: Also, anyone know what the ENT in the top right is?
  9. He only does that for ED/BST modules. He didn't do one for the MiG-21, Hawk or C-101. This is done by RAZBAM, so he likely won't do one for the Mirage. He also does say that release next week IS feasible,he just implies it is unlikely. So "nowhere near release" is, at the very least, a misnomer. For the F/A-18 however, it would be accurate, just not the Mirage.
  10. Could try different smoke animation over certain AOA? But I know next to nothing about this kind of stuff! So it may not be possible to fix.
  11. http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2596901&postcount=26 Be warned, IIRC Zeus stated IFF is NOT functional yet. So call RAYGUN in multiplayer at least.
  12. Yeah, this is literally the only issue with it and is very minor. Also if you like your pedals close(er) together Milan does sell an adapter.
  13. This man speaks the truth. They are just phenomenal! You find yourself finding reasons to use them just because they feel so good.:thumbup:
  14. Yeah. Still, we got some aircraft this year. We should still get the Mirage. But neither LNS module is looking like it made it, nor did the VEAO P-40. Makes you wonder why they bother announcing in anything advance really, just look at how long ago the hornet first surfaced. Let us know when it is ready, or shortly before. Waiting just makes everyone antsy!:D
  15. And in 2.0s case, an ALPHA. I am not advocating that ED not test stuff before release, but unless testing is almost complete, how can ED be sure it's next week? And how the hell did the MiG-21/C-101 Make it into 2.0 when they flat out don't work? I am right in assuming they don't want two products releasing on the same day (Enemy Within and the M2000) to ease the strain on dealing with issues?
  16. IIRC the F-16 has a similar system depending on CAT I/CAT III settings, and also brings up a master caution warning if incorrect. BMS has this modeled if you want to take a look. It significantly affects handling in the F-16, and I can't wait to see how it affects the Mirage!
  17. Yeah... Let's say, hypothetically, if the Mirage was to release tomorrow, what time? I guess 20:00, GMT :D
  18. FTFY (I hope)
  19. Surely not as amused as Zeus is watching us suffer! :D
  20. They just changed the cover pic on the module page. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/m2000c/ Now says RAZBAM in bottom left...
  21. Probably keeping a low profile and working their asses off!:D
  22. MICA is not implemented on the RDI radar (Which this Mirage has) so only Fox 1 (SARH, like AIM-7) and Fox 2, (Like AIM-9) No AIM-120 equivalent. That would be the 2000-5 with RDY radar. More info here: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=147288
  23. Ah right, I don't think the complete pylon list is available yet. I would also like to see that, more info is always good!
  24. If you are an A2G fan, the Viggen is going to be the better option. In A2A, M2K has the advantage of Radar missiles, but only carries 2x SARH, 2x Heater. Viggen has 6x Heater but no radar armament. (IIRC it can use radar to slew the AIM9, but that's about it)
  25. Is it odd that you just made perfect sense to me? :huh:
×
×
  • Create New...