Chlebakus

Thats it. As I said before - dont be so excited.

You had lunch with them? :huh:

I just dont like missinformation. This forum is quite full of it. This poll was maybe created as some response to some statement there and elsewhere, but the point is still the ones who should be the ones asking are not the ones asking. I dont want to see disappointed group of people who believed that BST wanted to know something.

I voted for W version since I would like to see another modern heli in DCS. But my recommendation is not to be so excited about this poll. It was not created by anyone labeled "BST developer" and there was no sign of their interest. I am just not sure how much it is them who asks us.

I agree. I didnt try to dogfight in multiplayer but single player experience in Dora vs. Mustang was very dissapointing. AI Mustang often seems to be bound with a rope to my 6. And when I manage to outclimb him or anything else, he dissapears from my sight for a second and seems to put invisible cloak on him. I cannot imagine how players could find each other in multiplayer. Except using labels, which are not very popular. I find this a little bit annoying in DCS. Never really had this problem in Cliffs of Dover.

I know what you mean. They are not bound to tell us anything. Maybe their approach is a little bit unfair. I wonder if there is some kind of contract with 3rd parties. You can really announce anything here if you are labeled "developer"? In RAZBAM case it seems so :(

I was pretty dissapointed when I found out I wont get anything from these RAZBAM machines. Their product list is very promising, but unreal by now.

You got some point. In this case it results to screaming simmers who would like to know anything new about DCS RAZBAM modules. And ignorant developer who doesnt respond. Maybe neither read it. Making it very funny situation when you think about it.

Face the reality. Blessed be the one who forget this developer exist.

Maybe it is absence of "good guys" what would help stopping these nonsense flame wars. Have you ever noticed that most of these hassles starts with first defending reply after reply of pissed member? Off topic like hell, but I cant help myself.

I would like it too and definitively buy it with clickables. DCS made me love all Russian flying machines.

+1 for what? Isnt this the actual reason why people there are pissed? Not communicating developer with announced modules on this forum. Two years almost without any sign of progress. Then tell me if RAZBAM is really worthy to be there or at least announce modules that seems to be dead. It results in hassle like this. Then it is late to tell others to calm down because they want to know something more about announced stuff. Two years... I dont mean it bad. I was pretty excited when I found Harrier in RAZBAM subforum. I found some screenshots of WIP cockpit with nice view at Georgia... Then I found out it is almost two years old. No news anywhere. So I ignore this RAZBAM subforum and I am fine with it. I recomment it to others too. Relax your nerves.

I remebered this misson very well. Maybe I will try it again to see if it works now. These Hinds didnt do anything and then let themselves to be shot down by some survived units. Results made me continue with campaign only with 67%. Sometimes I wonder, if anyone really flew this campaign, because it was obviously not tested through updates. I think mission 11 (if I remember well) is impossible to complete without some corrections in editor. Air support destroyed by 2xOSA and then objective to destroy +-8 tanks, +-10 BTR, trucks and some other armored vehicles. Count with destroying of this OSAs, two Shilkas and Strela-1 in way too bad light conditions to lock anything with shkval, idiotic wingman... No way!

I also recommend you to make your own profile. Try to set some modifier and then use it to mod other rockers and so. DMS, TMS, coolie, slew, trim. Whatever you need. It is possible to make almost complete HOTAS. Except mic and some countermeasures switch in my case.

I think ammo storage is indestructible. Try regular storage. I dont know its name in English. It is square flat white building. It should work.

This post does not exist. It was made in Photoshop. Be adult and dont make troll things like that. Muhuhehehe.

I enjoyed it too. It is the best campaign I have played so far.

Is there any point of having English cockpit in Dora? It is German machine and I do not think it was ever made in this language in her era.

I have no idea if it is a bug: Switch master arm on and then push the button. The lights will appear. As far as I know, it should work with master arms off but it does not. Poor FARPs and airports. Gotta get destroyed by Mi8 pilots who are charging their weapons :lol:

Since I have seen this thread, I watch it a lot. Who cares about new module from Belsimtek? It has been a year or so Mi-8 is out. I really like this module, progress with sound and systems is great too. But guys, be a little harder on them. You spent your money as I did for the module and wait for a year to a non-existing english manual. I want it and you should really do it too. I am not sure if Belsimtek do something with it. How can possibly anyone apologise Belsimtek? A year of waiting? Is that really that hard do finish it when everyone paid for it? A year. Dammed! And some reply or reaction? Silence.

Hello, There should be another task to extract some soldiers near armor that passes through village. Try to land near them and see if it doesnt trigger. Maybe try to open mission in editor and resave it.

Maybe there is one missing fact. This is PC game. Someone could say it is not a game, but simulator. There is no reason why we cannot jump right into F-18 :thumbup:. Training is nice asset but as mentioned before it is maybe not as necessary to have sooo many trainers. Because developers can do whatever they want but they might not get their reward. But maybe i am wrong. And this is what it is. Our feedback. And not just about trainers.

Wow, that's the word!

Make love, not war. Neither of us here can solute anything here. I like DCS. I will buy many of new modules. Even those that I point at in this forum. DCS is great and uncomparable to other sim games. We all owe a big thank to every single programmer. (Jenom malá jazyková vložka. Spojení "in my eyes" v použitym významu je v angličtině nesmysl. Sice jsem si nejspíš právě udělal nepřítele, ale nemohl jsem si pomoct.)

We are not so stupid to think, we can choose what to develop, neither we think this talking about nothing will solute anything. The point was there are many new modules to come, but trainers, old Cobra, old Sabre...? It just dont fit on this battlefield. Trainers were explained. Others did not. 4-5 incoming modules, but are you that happy about them in global? Maybe you are missing point of this thread. There we have the chance to say our: "We are not glad." Its not: "We want to change it and we want this and this." All specific forums are full of people who talk like: "Love it and take my money, looks great, gimme that." Let us tell the DCS community and devs that not everyone is happy with new modules. Then ask for some reasoning. It is not because it is one module, or two. As I mentioned, there are far more of them to say: "No, this is not attractive."