Hydrox

Oh? Is that so?

I'd assume my speed is like 14, maybe more 17? 19km/h tops. Coxy_99 "Its a wind bug for FC3: Hoping for a hot fix soon it hurts the eyes after awhile. " I'm speechless..

Well I'm building my own missions from scratch and the shaking is there. I don't think it has nothing to do with missions or payloads. Plane is just broken.

None of the other aircraft have it and that's the difference, they are playable. This is not. First it was just Su-25T and now Su-25A have it also. Both are unplayable in this condition and since you decided to encrypt certain files I can't do anything to fix it myself. And also if it's so realistic (which it isn't, just eye torturing), why doesn't for example Su-27/33 have it then? Well, if they had there would be much less flankers flying around in MP servers. So could you just restore Su-25s to proper flying condition?

Ok, got it fixed, there was an old .lua file(s) in DCS directories, removed them. Weirdly enough it had nothing to do with the Yak-52 files.

Is the Yak-52 folder "DCS World\Mods\Aircraft\Yak-52" still present ? Yes s the Yak-52 missing as a playable aircraft in the Mission Editor ? Yes As I said Yak-52 iis missing from game completely, I have it installed as from the day I bought it. Now it's gone completely and yes of course I've repaired etc. It's clock icon, not tank and I haven't touched it. What it comes to encyclopedia, there's not all weapons and even less descriptions for the existing ones, basically rendering it it useless.

I have latest DCS version. This is not nice at all. Other bug is that at least that weapons have no encyclopedia entries, haven't checked others.

I'd like to know which was the version number of DCS when with the UI scaling you could make mission editor texts bigger than in default 1080p resolution. It worked before the big 3D model of plane in payload window was introduced.

Черный Дракул Thank you again, good to know there's a lot of options to adjust labels, I will use these.

@Черный Дракул Thank you. I set the red side labels to black and made them bigger, now I can see them, can't really get closer to monitor, using 32" monitor 25 inches away. Mission editor however is another problem now that scaling doesn't work, maybe it will be fixed, would make it easier to set things up.

Oh, I'm jumping on people now?! dear lord.. thanks for contributing..

Oh, I see you think attacking and blaming me makes you feel better now, really dude, how low can you go? What are you even doing in this thread, you're clearly incapable of contributing anything useful here, oh but that wasn't the purpose of your visit in this thread from the beginning, now was it?

Hhm.. so there is people with brains in this forum too, glad to see that. You know coming back from blindness and fighting and the seeing messages like those before, makes one wonder what has happened to some/many people in recent years. Not much brain-activity at all, but mocking, anger, foolishness etc. that's what one gets when opening the door of fancy world of Internet.

Title..

Yes, probably same thing, I hope it gets fixed. Everything seems to be upside down in the world these days...

Daytime flight hours are logged as nighttime hours in logbook.

When I open the 2D window of NS430, it's all zoomed in and it's impossible to use it. So it seems that it's unusable at the moment.

Pretty pointless to add static planes to airfields to increase the immersion just a little bit, result is 20+ FPS lagfest. Using mouse to pan view results poor fps frame skipping etc. This is just ridiculous. Why bother upgrading computer when DCS code kills it anyway.

In case this problem somehow gets fixed, don't you all worry, they have it covered; MSAA x4 is causing skins look crap too and that's not about red/yellow textures. MSAAx4 is causing havoc on planes' skin textures by adding nice black 'mist' onto them.

How about a lootbox system where you can have a chance to get some new skins to your aircraft. Weapons, fuel tanks could be earned with those too. That would be good for all new players who are just starting the game. First you need to buy a module(s) and get a subscription, then you have much time to learn the planes while throwing money at screen buying lootboxes. Who knows you could even get Amraam or 10xSidewinder from a box. Then you could advance to MP and use those hard earned missiles. Imagine the joy of discovering a fuel tank from a lootbox, now you could fly farther and if you still had a missile, or even A-G weapon you could do a ground strike. It pointless that all missiles are just 'given' to you, nothing beats the achievement of opening a gold lootbox and getting 10xMaverick pack. And what's best of this you wouldn't need to pay for anything useless since you'd already payed for the module(s) and the subscription fee. That would ensure that you can come back to game again and again any time you want. Obviously the lootboxes would be optional so you wouldn't need to buy those. Win-win scenario.

Fantastic idea, I suggest yearly payment of.. say 200$, also that way people who can only play the game 2-3 days a week or less could be sure that their planes were available for playing any day they wanted. Also they wouldn't need to plan ahead when they're in mood for playing because the payment would have been taken care of already. So now that I have bought the modules I wanted, I'd have to start paying subscription fee to be able to play them too. Whoever thought of this must be genius. If the subsciption fee would be applied only to new modules, ED would loose lots of customers because the majority of the people are against such anti-consumer crap. Obviously ED would have to concentrate on the new modules which have subscription fee leaving the old modules behind and when the reality is that they all have some issues still, which wouldn't be fixed they would loose that customer base too. P.S. You forgot the vote option 4; Only if the subscription makes ED employees superhumans who magically work faster.

Caucasus = no issue, Nevada = no issue Gulf = ISSUE = game issue NVIDIAs issue? Not likely. Also don't bother with NVIDIAs AA & AF settings, they have no effect in DCS, never have.

Do you also know why it affects only PG map?

Same here, I wouldn't wait a fix in near future...

That's not the only thing, they also managed to break all skins with this new one.