CallsignFrosty

+1! :pilotfly:

Can't wait for empty servers of players trying this out!

Lol SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

Can't DCS just read the current main window render resolution and use that to factor the size of the dots? It knows exactly what resolution it is drawing every frame and it's written in the MonitorSetup.lua! I love my 4K monitor but I feel blind even in dogfights because a 4k pixel dot on a 28" screen half a meter away from my eyes is pretty small! And I don't even need glasses yet!

I'm not going to be mean because you are new to the job and you seem well intentioned. The update changed the harrier and other devs were perfectly able to provide an accurate changelog to communicate the changes within the products that they sell. The best way to combat the stream of abuse that you guys are (rightfully) receiving over the absolute state of the harrier is to publish the changes, fixes and updates that you do make. The other way is to actually TEST your product after any changes. I will volunteer my time for free and for absolutely nothing to help you guys test the harrier and it's systems if thats what you need. It is abundantly clear to me that there is a lack of testing and a fundamental misunderstanding of the systems in the harrier - which I may be able to help with. There is no way that the auto bombing bug should have made it's way into the open-beta build. I'm only like this to you because I WANT you guys to succeed and build a successful company, producing quality modules - which I believe you are fully capable of. You just need some help and I am offering it.

Or just bind TDC depress to a separate button. I now have it mapped to the warthog stick button 5 (the one on the right side at the top) and it works much better than before even using the radar.

Bumping for RAZBAM attention.

Just like the majority of systems on this airframe - it does not currently work. When it is working, the 'Slave' button in the bottom right of the TGP MFD page slews the TGP to the current DMT target or INS target. That means that to targets a steerpoint in your TGP you will have to press the Waypoint Designate button on the EHSD page first.

yes, there should be - apparently it's almost fixed

An STT scream at the enemy aircraft will result in a ‘spike’ call, a TWS lock and launch even on a single target will only result in the enemy calling ‘nails’ and will not know when a launch has occurred. It’s generally not a good thing to announce your position, intentions and current actions in any kind of warfare but especially not in the modern air combat environment. An STT lock is over kill in the BVR (with Fox 3’s) environment, resulting in lack of situational awareness and giving the enemy a ‘hard lock’ tone. SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

Deus vult! SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

Please be trolling - this level of madness is too good. I love it, please continue! SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

You guys don’t know how to have fun, do you!? SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

I am British and I can safely say that I have never seen anyone in a swastika tee shirt. I think that you may be talking out of your arse I’m afraid. SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

*response Censored by HM Intelligence Services* SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

Erm wow, I’m sure the Jews are thrilled to have such a normal-functional human being to support their internationalist goals! SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

Depressing state of affairs for sure. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I feel like the basket in real life might help guide the probe onto the connection better? In DCS the probe tends to warp through the metal basket... Do you think this is the case?

Excellent post, my thoughts exactly. Let’s drop the elitism lads, help the guys who struggle. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would just prefer that they made the systems on the harrier work. That may mean using information from the forums in order to complete that task. Your question is a false dichotomy. I have done by waiting this long to make a complaint but the radio silence, lack of updates and inability to confirm that systems have problems or need to be redesigned does not fill me with confidence. And trust me, I really want them to succeed.

Clearly not if people contine to post in it..

Yeah as I also said , I have no problems with the mirage in waiting for new features as it works right now (or at least I think so).

Thanks for proving my point. No significant updates for months - flipping the direction of a switch throw and fixing a course line that was broken... wew. UFC data entry I guess you could consider some work into the module but it doesn't actually work properly and hasn't received any bug fixes since. TL;DR - Some people will defend anything just to conform.

That's not what a strawman argument means and 'muh logical fallacy' arguements make me yawn. You have yet to refute a point except "early access" Low Energy, SAD! Tarawa updates are not harrier updates

Let’s just get something straight. I haven’t complained about this module or razbam at all before. I find it kind of disturbing that certain types of people start coming out of the woodwork to attempt to shill for third party devs as soon as any criticism is made. That being said - yes people complain WAY too much about early access problems. And as I stated before - I have every single module so I am aware of the concept of early access and what to expect from them. I didn’t complain about the mirage at all because it was early access and despite its teething trouble early on, it was and is a functional module. What I mean by that is that it’s primary operational function can be fulfilled. Of course there are systems missing or bugged but I see the mirage as something that has its core systems working and I love the module. I also love the Harrier. It’s my favourite module in dcs. That is why I don’t want it to die. If you reread the OP I tried to convey the fact I WANT this to work out for Razbam (however that may or may not have come across because i wrote it at 2am). There are not just broken or non implemented systems with the Harrier however. There are wrongly implemented systems with no acknowledgment of the issue and despite oceans of data provided that shows exactly how they should work. Data provided by customers that love the module so much they invested large amounts of time in research to correct it. For free! To the user that made a list of items implemented in the last 3 months - how many of those items actually work? For me the biggest game breaker at the moment is the non functional CCRP and the non functional ripple release. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk