CallsignFrosty

Please be trolling - this level of madness is too good. I love it, please continue! SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

You guys don’t know how to have fun, do you!? SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

I am British and I can safely say that I have never seen anyone in a swastika tee shirt. I think that you may be talking out of your arse I’m afraid. SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

*response Censored by HM Intelligence Services* SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

Erm wow, I’m sure the Jews are thrilled to have such a normal-functional human being to support their internationalist goals! SOROS 1-1 reporting for duty!

Depressing state of affairs for sure. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I feel like the basket in real life might help guide the probe onto the connection better? In DCS the probe tends to warp through the metal basket... Do you think this is the case?

Excellent post, my thoughts exactly. Let’s drop the elitism lads, help the guys who struggle. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would just prefer that they made the systems on the harrier work. That may mean using information from the forums in order to complete that task. Your question is a false dichotomy. I have done by waiting this long to make a complaint but the radio silence, lack of updates and inability to confirm that systems have problems or need to be redesigned does not fill me with confidence. And trust me, I really want them to succeed.

Clearly not if people contine to post in it..

Yeah as I also said , I have no problems with the mirage in waiting for new features as it works right now (or at least I think so).

Thanks for proving my point. No significant updates for months - flipping the direction of a switch throw and fixing a course line that was broken... wew. UFC data entry I guess you could consider some work into the module but it doesn't actually work properly and hasn't received any bug fixes since. TL;DR - Some people will defend anything just to conform.

That's not what a strawman argument means and 'muh logical fallacy' arguements make me yawn. You have yet to refute a point except "early access" Low Energy, SAD! Tarawa updates are not harrier updates

Let’s just get something straight. I haven’t complained about this module or razbam at all before. I find it kind of disturbing that certain types of people start coming out of the woodwork to attempt to shill for third party devs as soon as any criticism is made. That being said - yes people complain WAY too much about early access problems. And as I stated before - I have every single module so I am aware of the concept of early access and what to expect from them. I didn’t complain about the mirage at all because it was early access and despite its teething trouble early on, it was and is a functional module. What I mean by that is that it’s primary operational function can be fulfilled. Of course there are systems missing or bugged but I see the mirage as something that has its core systems working and I love the module. I also love the Harrier. It’s my favourite module in dcs. That is why I don’t want it to die. If you reread the OP I tried to convey the fact I WANT this to work out for Razbam (however that may or may not have come across because i wrote it at 2am). There are not just broken or non implemented systems with the Harrier however. There are wrongly implemented systems with no acknowledgment of the issue and despite oceans of data provided that shows exactly how they should work. Data provided by customers that love the module so much they invested large amounts of time in research to correct it. For free! To the user that made a list of items implemented in the last 3 months - how many of those items actually work? For me the biggest game breaker at the moment is the non functional CCRP and the non functional ripple release. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have every module except the new Yak, I understand how early access works - thanks. I don't have a problem with slow dev time - I have a problem when the devs are unable to acknowledge problems in the basic concept of how the systems actually work. Early access also implies that it is in active development - no real updates or fixes in 3 months or so at this rate, if I'm wrong - prove me wrong.

Sorted? As in you have sorted my criticism or me out? Sheer arrogance - I provided a list of just the basics that have been skipped over since release, including many module-breaking ones and you have a little phrase that addresses nothing.

Here comes the one word reply crowd. When was the last update of any kind of significance?

I am not normally in this kind of mood where I am extremely critical but today I have reached my limit with this module and have to make a complaint thread. The harrier was released about 9 months ago. The CCIP does not work properly. Auto (CCRP) does not work properly (the ASL does not move correctly and is basically unusable) The APU doesn't work and the rest of the other power/fuel systems are not implemented or at least - not realistically. TGP -not working. Weapon parameter UFC not implemented. Weapon interval and ripple quantity panel not working (!!!!!!!) INS not finished. And plenty more but lets be honest these are the real deal breakers. I am the guy that always defends this module but your in ability to even reply to the very well sourced thread about the CCIP pipper and many other issues. Sorry but can you please sort this module out? At the moment it is sub-flaming cliffs level of simulation and it is meant to be a 'DCS' module. We are your consumers and I feel like some kind of explanation might be due. :cry: That's it, I got it all out. edit: inb4 muh early access.

Razbam, any news? I am very salty about this now.

Im about to check this out now - will be interesting as I have a 1080 connected to a displayport gsync 4k monitor

Now I have a new problem ;) I took the the saved mission and edited it but when I saved it, the editor crashed and I lost all of the changes. I was able to keep reproducing this eveytime i tried Please see the attached log file. https://ufile.io/oxh4h

Cancel that - it is now suddenly working!!! Strange that I didn’t change anything! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Chromium, I seem to be having the exact same problem with our server that Picchio is having. The temp folder is created but no mission file. The message ‘saving mission’ comes up but no .miz file appears. I have triple checked the permissions on both the C:\ folder and the saved games folder but to no avail. It works absolutely fine on my client PC when mission testing, just not on the server. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dangerman- keep going, this stuff is gold. My mate has transitioned onto typhoons now but when he was doing this stage of training it was fun chatting about these little techniques. Of course I was and still am hugely jealous of his career choices lol. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So before they had proper PN, the dcs missiles bled their energy straight off of the rail because they instantly ‘knew’ the intercept angle - instead of gradually adjusting in flight that is? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk