Joni

Yes

Yes indeed. But there were many times were the contacts reverted back to yellow for no reason after blinking for a second. Wags even says "it got dropped" when changing azimuth, but that should not happen, the memory must keep the HAFU.

Can you imagine using it like that? Everyone will have it off all the time.

The HOTAS RAID button changes between those. But I think that if they are overlapped you won't see which you have selected. I'm not sure.

So watching Wags' video about automatic IFF I noticed that the already interrogated contacts that resulted in friendlty or hostile HAFUs often turned back into unknown yellow HAFUs. I was wondering if it was a bug during the video or if the system really works like that (like losing the HAFU quickly until the next update frame comes in). This is a very awaited feature for me and I felt quite bummed when I saw the video.

EDIT: this bug happens at erratic ranges. When launching from 65nm and JSOW A it doesn't happen.

For me JSOW C can be launched when the TMR timer is still at 3 minutes left... Lol. 65nm, 30k, 300knots Either the weapon doesn't work well, or the maths for the timer are incorrect.

I think the seeker shows a different aspect view and they are overlapping. Mabye the TOO seeker shows liek the AZ EL page of the attack radar.

Roger. Thanks. Yes I do have the Raven One and still haven't played with it. No wonder why it is so good coming from Baltic Dragon, a genius in making missions. I have to admit to be extremely dissapointed to see that the Red Flag campaign and missions in general for the modules that have these, do not intent to immerse you into the real thing. I mean, I would be so immersed with comms, procedures, etc., but as soon as I assasin a friendly and no one says anything all the immersion goes to hell. Maybe it's just me.

Well, I just saw this video and I would not feel very immersed killing a friendly with real guns, seeing him blown up from the sky, die, and return to base like nothing happened. I guess I got my answer

Hey! I was talking in general, like what is the nature of a red flag campaign in DCS? Do they try to replicate real life feelings like other campaigns? Or just fire missiles and the middle of the nevada dessert without a reason?

Hi guys, I wanted to ask a question to see if I buy or not the Red Flag campaign of the Hornet. I saw some videos of the player shooting down migs and stuff, so how realistic can the campaign be? How does it justify the presence of migs in the united states without causing a masive mental breakdown in the pilots? I don't think they shoot live missiles and destroy real migs valued in millions of dollars in the real red flag. So I was wondering if maybe the campaign is simulating a red flag simulation rather than a red flag IRL. Thanks.

Hi rudel! Thanks, I know, that's why I open this thread looking for a workaround that maybe I didn't know it existed like I didn't know the templates exist. Isn't there any way to merge mission files?

When a track is needed you don't have to wait until you see the bug, you have to force it. Go and jump in the cockpit and start doing CCIP until it happens.

Anyone?

Actually far from true. The Hornet has many, many, many more HOTAS functions than what we have now in DCS. ED will implement them eventually. So to OP: Although the Hornet's HOTAS will never be like the A10C, it is by no means as weak as the current DCS version. You'll have plenty to work with before needing a third arm. Regards,

Thanks. I just tested and while in CCIP on the stores page but AUTO due to having a TGT made, auto lasing works anyway. So I guess it is dependant on the actual mode rather than the stores program.

Another track showing the bug more clear. SA doesn't show the contact of a PPLI painted aircraft when PPLI is turned off. I had to turn of SURV as well so it doesn't get fed by him. datalink radar2.trk

This is the bug that you can reproduce 100% of the times. The other is erratic.

Come again? What is that config you said?

The AZ EL page won't show contacts that are PPLI and are being painted by the radar. Additionally the SA page won't show them either if you turn off PPLI sensor but paint them with radar. Track attached. datalink radar.trk

Yeah, but it isn't about proof but rather a track where all parameters at the moment of the bug can be seen by ED. And that other users can replay and see if on their machines happens the same.

So believe or not I just learned about the static templates and its use... Shame on me I noticed that only the units are saved but not the triggers and zones. Is there any way to save templates for those? I ask this because I would like to have some templates of SAMs with triggers that simulate turning off their radars randomly when there are HARMs in the air. Thanks.

Someone please post a track in the bug section. there are tons of threads about this CCIP bug but no one gets reported. I see no issues, but if you guys are it'll be good to post a track.

Yes, that is correct behavior, the line is your nose and the diamond is your track. When doing high Gs you will see that in HUD. Also if there is wind. I didn't find any innacuracy in CCIP. Can you guys post tracks?