razo+r

Some details would have been cool I guess, like for example saying that tracking works with guns but not with missiles.

Should be doable but quite cumbersome I can imagine.

Hard to tell with no information.

Autostart only works with full fidelity modules since for FC (At least FC3 aircraft), RShift+Home (And of course also turning on the power with RShift+L) does start the engines and you don't need to do anything else.

George Washington isn't free, it's part of the Super Carrier, which is why you spawn in the air and not on the carrier. The free ones are the Forrestal and the Vinson.

Also make sure you remove all mods and run a repair. One specific mod, which I cannot remember anymore, prevented carriers from ever appearing in a mission.

Your attached picture doesn't show.

Make sure the airfield belongs to your coalition, has gunners in it's warehouse and that you are within the service zone of the airport. Which mission is that?

1) Nö glaube nicht. 2) Einfach nach links lehnen, mehr gibts da nicht zu tun.

Why don't you upload a short track so people can see if you are missing something or you found a bug...

Das macht bei dir das @? Meine Güte diese vielen Tastaturlayouts sind kompliziert...

ED removed the ST version in the last update.

@ Kannst du mit kopieren oder AltGr+2 machen... Nach dem @ den Nutzernamen eingeben und auswählen und dann gibts den blauen Rahmen

There is no clear yes/no answer to that. Explosion might be unlikely, but it can still set you on fire. And it could also cause catastrophic damage, or not. There are so many variables at play here, wire thickness, aircraft type and construction, fuel load, weapon load, speed etc.

Fair enough. Can you tell us what wind you set and the strength? Sometimes DCS can be weird if the wind is not strong enough, like for example 2-5 kts wind setting. It is better to land into the wind for performance reason but sometimes due to operational reasons landing with a tailwind is acceptable and prefered. And to be honest, if you want to land with headwind so much, just do an ILS followed by a circling. As for selectable runways, perhaps that will be available in a few decades when ED has overhauled the ATC system.

"Nav wind" as far as I know is wind coming from, so it would be headwind. Either way, some slight tailwind is and can be acceptable as long as it is within the airframe and performance limitations.

The old KA-50 black shark 2 had holes in the tubes if I remember correctly and that has been improved/fixed with the Black shark 3 version. The Su-25T is still using the old launchers instead of the improved and correct new launch tubes.

Do you actually see the missiles or just the cover that closes again after the missile is fired?

You cannot fully raise the hook. Once lowered, mechanics need to push it into place again.

So just to clarify when you contacted the ATC it told you RWY 24 is active and not 06?

Not yet. Still waiting for ED to implement paratroopers...

Perhaps a DCS limitation? Either way, OP not only flew from the wrong direction but also used the wrong ILS Frequency. A good example I guess that shows not everything in DCS is realistic and that there may be a difference between real world and ingame content/charts/frequencies.

Yes and no. A Loc approach is supposed to be flown from one and only one direction. However, a localiser antenna is also radiating backwards so you could capture the backcourse of it. Just that this isn't done anymore and there is no need for a backcourse approach if you have an ILS for it instead. The airfields on Caucasus you mean don't have an approach from the opposite because of mostly terrain reasons, sometimes money reasons. But if you were to place your aircraft on the opposite of the ILS you tuned to, you should still get the localiser backcourse of it. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/systems/how-to-fly-a-localizer-back-course-approach/ And as far as I know backcourse was always a thing in DCS. But I am not sure in this case as I don't know the frequencies by heart but judging by the description, it does seem to be the case as it perfectly matches what you expect from a Loc BC approach, no glideslope and reversed Loc sensing.

What exactly do you mean? What OP is describing is that RWY 06 is active and he is getting the localiser backcourse of it (condition being of course that the ILS has the same frequency for both directions). And just to rule out all factors and DCS's irregularities, forcing the wind to make sure that 24 is indeed the active one would help to confirm wheter or not it is working correctly or not.

Did you set the proper wind to force RWY 24 to be active?