fixen

If all else fails, call the ghostbusters. Sorry for the OT

Good read.

Yes, as a 10 kill streak.... Joking aside, you can kinda do that yourself with CA. But better implementation would be nice.

I would not go for the trackclip pro. I hear they break a LOT. I use the vector clip on a hat. It works just as good rooms with not much light. If you have a room where there is a lot of sunlight it might not work as good.

I have everything set to max/extreme. No problems here, also with a GTX970. Except for screen resolution. I have that set to 512.

PSU should be ok. Fortron is a decent brand and this does not seems like a PSU issue. I suspect it has more to do with the bèta. Though your CPU is not very powerfull, you should get better frames. I have a i5 4690K and GTX 970 and my frames are much better. The thing I always do when buying new parts is a complete reinstall. But I understand that not everyone wants to do that. Edit: I just read that the 4690k has 81% better single core performance than a 8320. So you are going to lose some frames there.

I meant the super 530D. The R-27ER is also LOAL compatible. That is because the seeker has no way it can pick up a radar return on max range (lets say >60km for the R-27ER). The first part of a R-27ER's flight is INS and MCCU, the seeker takes over once it has a solid lock.

Is there a form of lock-on after launch? Where you are able to launch the missile without it having a solid lock until it is in flight for some time? Acquiring the lock mid flight.

The crowd that video attracts is really something else. I also think that the video does not say much about aircraft performance. Just looking at the title I know enough. Military equipment video's on youtube always get a cesspool of hate comments. "We are better than you". "No, we are better". The pathetic thing is a lot of them are not even kids.

That is a really good idea!

Since there is a log which tracks what people do in multiplayer those people would get banned soon enough.

I would like an F-4, but it does not fit any of the things mentioned. Also, I think there were some problems with getting a license for a F-4.

I always unplug all my flight gear when not in use. The idea is that it will last longer, which is probably bull. I have most things connected through two usb hubs connected to two front usb slots for easy access. So plugging the things in and out is really easy.

I would really like a A-6. I have no idea why, but I have an obsession for that aircraft. Ofcourse it would have to be multiplayer ready. Though I would also like a F-15E, harrier and many more. Not much of a fan of the A-7, but that might change.

I am also getting a lot of crashes but the event viewer shows various causes, one of them being the dx11backend.dll. Others i have found include: NGModel.dll Effects.dll and some unkowns

I think it would be great from a marketing standpoint. If I have the F-14 I would also like the A-6 so i can have more than one aircraft type on my carrier and have a realistic loadout. Also multiplayer in an A-6 would be awesome. You can have multiplayer maps where there is only a bluefor carrier and F-14 for A2A and A-6 for groundpounding. Would be great.

Can't it be used for other things aswell, like nav and mav (which would make it a Multi Function Display)?

This one has a MFD, but this might be a modified F-5E cockpit though.

I actually thought everyone new this. It is not so weird you have to set up your controls first right. That also means axis controls.

Depends on your flightstick. I fly without curves.

What includes an advanced radar model? What are the differences? Should it be named like the EFM?

An enhanced variant of the AS 37, designated the Armat (Anti Radiation MArTel), was developed in the early eighties, and deployed with the French Air Force in 1984, subsequently exported to Egypt, Kuwait and Iraq. The missile was reputedly used during the Iran-Iraq war to destroy Iranian radar sites, fired from the Mirage F.1 . The Armat shares its basic airframe and propulsion with the AS 37 Martel. The Armat is a heavyweight among ARMs, weighting in at 1200 lb / round, with a 331 lb high explosive warhead, and with a fuselage length of 13.5 ft and diameter of 15.7 in. The large airframe accommodates a Hotchkiss-Brandt/SNPE Basile solid propellant boost stage with a 2.4 second burn, and an SNPE Cassandre solid propellant sustainer with a 22 second burn. The missile has a quoted range for a high altitude launch of about 50 NM. Compared with the AS 37, the Armat has a significantly improved passive homing seeker designed in the early eighties by Dassault Electronique. The microprocessor based seeker will home on to a programmed emitter, be it a radar or a jammer, and uses inertial midcourse guidance. With its high launch weight, heavyweight warhead and long range, the Armat is primarily an offensive strategic ARM designed to destroy Early Warning and Ground Control Intercept radars. This is where it differs fundamentally from the HARM and the ALARM, which are built to also perform as defensive ARMs carried as part of a mixed weapon load. As the missile is 50% heavier than the HARM, and twice the weight of the ALARM, it is unlikely to compete successfully against these newer missiles. http://www.ausairpower.net/alarm-armat.html ARMAT was a private development using an improved, wideband ESD seeker. The French government and Air Force weren`t quite worried about exporting MArtel/ARMAT and the export missile, while having the wideband receiver, seems to have had degraded capabilities. French missiles were upgraded in the late 1980s using the ARMAT technology to a wideband homing head. With the retirement of the Mirage IIIE, Jaguar became the sole platform. Jaguar EW equipment was quite poor, so Martel missions required a lot of work as shown during its sole use in combat by the AdA against Lybia. It was retired in the late 1990s due to age, costs and suspected reliability.

This is what wiki has to say (which i know is not always a good source of information): The ARMAT was operational since 1984. It was used as main, if not exclusive anti-radar weapon by French aviation, employed by SEPECAT Jaguars against Libyans during Operation Epervier. The ARMAT was developed from the AS37 Martel in 1984. The missile stayed in service until 1999. The french airforce does not have any antiradar missiles in the inventory after that. The ARMAT is also called the AS37 by the way. AS37 ARMAT is the improved version of the AS37 Martel.

You can program wind correction in the CDU right? Doesn't it also calculate the drift on the parachutes and correct the drop position for it? I don't personally know If it also calculates parachute drift and how to do it. I think I saw it in some YouTube video but then for mk82 bombs and not cbu-105