Jump to content

LuSi_6

Members
  • Posts

    430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LuSi_6

  1. Happy New year! Hope F-14 comes before Viggen
  2. maybe I missed it: is the Viggen SEAD capable? domestic or US/NATO weapons?
  3. well, Red Flag is not to evaluate aircraft performance, it's a large scale excercise with lots of ROE and restrictions. It's no free for all dogfight deathmatch
  4. Happy New year from Germany! Fireworks are over, Drinks are cold and the night long. Cheers!
  5. LuSi_6

    S530 Range

    With both, target and launch platform closing at Mach 1.4 the AIM-7 does not travel 100km. Just saying... 50km for the 530? At what conditions? 25nm kill head on at high alt, high speed is possible ingame
  6. try this, works super nice in 1.5 http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=143009
  7. when you lock a target in STT there is no scan at all. your Radar antenna will only focus on your Target, no scanning. At least this is what it *should* do. maybe we found a bug?
  8. das ist eine Art Dolch, sollte das im Schleudersitz integrierte Schlauchboot im Cockpit irrtümlich aufgehen kann der Pilot das damit einstechen
  9. LuSi_6

    S530 Range

    So as I said, the cunclusion out of this graph is wrong, no matter if the graph itself is correct or not
  10. LuSi_6

    S530 Range

    nice, but pls read your own graph. The 530D does NOT bleed speed much faster than the AIM-7, it just start bleeding speed earlier. loss rate (and therefor the graph) is almost identical, just shifted by a few seconds, caused by longer burn time for the AIM-7. By this graph, nothing is wrong with the 530D
  11. maybe...someday... that M2000-C module will stop people from ground hugging while playing online. The 530D is pretty nice up there where the air is thin too!
  12. when you change distance settings to low you get a double HUD glass, both versions.
  13. only happens on low settings. 1.5.2 and 2.0. same issiu as double HUD on MiG-21 on low settings
  14. LuSi_6

    Bitchin' Betty?

    I prefer para_bellums version. In addition a pre flight baguette would be nice
  15. nice! thx
  16. and north of Stuttgart also on the A-81 between Heilbron and Würzburg :music_whistling:
  17. Hi, since there are no real missions for the M2000 within the Nevada map, I thought we could collect them here. I'll start with 4 "Desert Storm" missions... from Mission 1: 1991 Operation Desert Storm begins. It is 0330h local time. A key mission in this night is a runway attack to eleminate the Iraqi Airforce on the ground. A 4-ship package of F-15E Strike Eagles will perform the runway bombing. A 2-ship SEAD of Tornado GR.4 provided by the RAF will take care of ground based air defence. You and your 4-ship of Mirage 2000C will provide air cover during this night. The strike package should be over the target area when the first sunlight hits the desert. Strike Eagles and Tornados will wait for you at rendez-vous point, so hurry up! all in all it's 4 missions for the NEVADA Map, covering almost all mission types the M2000C can do. CAP, CAS, Strike and Intercept missions. More or less detailed briefings, some custom voices included. All missions are cold start, global task is to get familiar with the M2000C and, of course, survive! Difficulty should be easy to medium. Stick to your flightplan and instrctions! Have fun, leave a comment :joystick: DCS download link: http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/1689314/ Nevada M2000C Missions.zip
  18. I updated the Desert Storm Mission for the Mirage. Even more fun than with the F-15! :joystick: 01 Desert Storm M2000.miz
  19. ED themselfs do missile FM and stuff. The 530 is just more difficult to use, but inly slightly worse than the AIM-7 I defeat "excelent" AI MiG-29 A & S head on, SU-27 get tricky and is a 50/50 game. Human players tend to do different stuff for sure, but stop calling underperforming or prove with data. And yes, max. missile ranges are within perfect conditions against non-manouvering targets from very high altidudes and very fast launch plattforms
  20. I uninstalled FC3! It's only Mirage and MiG-21 for me when I want some TopGun feeling. For oldschool dogfight I still fly the Sabre and the MiG-15. I do not see the Mirage worse than those Modules! Lacking features will come as time goes, and for me as a single player guy the god damm IFF is no issue. I like it. I like it a lot!
  21. LuSi_6

    ECM help request

    pls don't go for that reason. If the real M2000 has that "problem", so it should have it ingame :thumbup:
  22. LuSi_6

    Radar IFF

    no, it's the way it still works today. no AWACS no BVR clearance. This was the case duiring Desert Storm, Balkan wars and last Iraq war. IFF fails much to often to be called a reliable thing
  23. the M2000 Radar can be fouled very easiely by flying 90° to it. It will loose lock and contact pretty soon, much much sooner than you might used to from SU-27 or F-15. hopefully because it's more realistic
  24. LuSi_6

    Radar IFF

    no IFF is here more realistic than FC3 IFF. Most BVR is and was forbidden by ROE because of very poor IFF, even today! BVR is only cleared if AWACS (or similar) gives clearance to do so = target is 100% not a friendly and not civilian. just don't go by FC3 IFF standard which couldn't be more far from RL
  25. FC3 deinstalliert :music_whistling: Hab jetzt meinen X-55 programiert, Luftkampf ist ja schon fast "easy mode" trotz (noch) fehlender features :joystick: FM find ich klasse, der FBW effekt lässt stark nach wenn man versucht bei asymetrischer Beladung zu landen. Einfach nur toll!
×
×
  • Create New...