felixx75

I wouldn't buy another version of a 190. There are enough other interesting warbirds (apart from the upcoming ones) before you implement another variant of an existing module.

And that's totally fine, but they are surely not limited to the Spanish language

Most people today don't even know that the word "patience" exists...

I very much doubt that Aerges or their SME's are limited to the Spanish language...

I had the problem a few days ago with 3x Mk83. I remember wondering why the CL TK lamp didn't go out, even after I had dropped the rack. However, I can no longer reproduce it today. I have just tested them all and the problem only occurs with the Mk84.

I don't hold my breath... But just because no Dev has commented on it doesn't mean we'll never get a Jaguar. No developer has talked much about an F-104 either, although many have wanted one for a long time. And look, Aerges is developing one. One does not mean the other.

Can confirm this too, not only for Mk84. Edit: can't reproduce it for other waepons, only Mk84 Yes, I did.

Why shouldn't there be a Jaguar at some point (regardless of the developer)? Are there no documentaries or secret documentation about the plane?

As much as I would like to have an F-111, I think HB has more than enough to do with the A-6, the support for the Eutofighter and the support of the existing modules (Viggen, Tomcat and Phantom) for the next few years.

ALCM shoud be fine

If you have deactivated (or not activated) the mouse for the jester wheel in the special options, entering numbers in the field hardly ever works (problems with the focus). You must currently have activated mouse for the Jester Wheel. Afaik HB is working on a solution. Edit: too late @Zabuzard was quicker

This might interest you. Really very well done training campaign https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3334349/

As far as I know, the fastest method is "ALCM", a stored heading alignment (must be set in the editor for the mission, afaik). This takes about 90 seconds. If you want a full alignment, the only option is a hot start or a cold start with the full 8 minute alignment.

I assume that this will be added in the future.

It works as intended.

Then it was probably a hidden fix, since this behavior was not there before... Apparently HB itself doesn't know about this hidden fix ^^ If this behavior is correct, all good. But I noticed the change in behavior on the first flight, hence the follow-up message.

Good Morning That's exactly how I do it.

I had wondered because I had not observed this behavior before the patch. I noticed it immediately on the first flight after the patch. How about the two tracks from my initial post...

I tested Walleyes just a few minutes ago, and for me they work perfectly.

It is still not possible to make reliable entries such as the laser code if you only use head tracking. But if you use both (mouse and head tracking), you have to wait until the system realizes that you want to use head tracking instead of the mouse.

Yes

Add a track and post it in the "bugs" section

Every time you activate the AFCS, the airplane gets a clear roll impulse to the right or left. Tested in air start and cold start (MT-Version) strange AFCS behavior cold start.trk strange AFCS behavior.trk

@Zabuzard @HB_Painter I have to apologize, because when I tried to create a track, everything worked as it should. For the first time, the Long Press did exactly what it was supposed to do. Since it was an air start, I thought I'd test it with a cold start (since I never actually fly a mission with an air start), but everything worked properly there too. So I can't say why it didn't work before, or why it's suddenly working now. I'm sorry about the circumstances, but basically I'm pleased that it now seems to be working without any problems.