-
Posts
1058 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by felixx75
-
Wie ich es gesagt hatte
-
Die Begründung habe ich Dir bereits geliefert. Es gibt absolut kein Motiv, das zu tun. Denn das hat nur negative Auswirkungen und bringt Razbam (oder sonst wem) nichts. Aber wenn Du Dich damit besser fühlst, Razbam Absicht zu unterstellen, bitte, tue Dir keinen Zwang an. Man kann Dich so oder so nicht vom Gegenteil überzeugen. Das ist die Natur von solchen Theorien...
-
Ich muß Dir keinen Grund nennen. Ich bin kein Entwickler. Trotzdem ist das Verschwörungstheoretischer Unsinn. Denn es bringt Razbam ja nichts, ganz im Gegenteil.
-
Aluhut...
-
Mh, in other words, all those players who have had (and still have) great fun with the F-15E and have flown hundreds of hours have wasted their time? I don't think so.
-
I wouldn't buy another version of a 190. There are enough other interesting warbirds (apart from the upcoming ones) before you implement another variant of an existing module.
-
And that's totally fine, but they are surely not limited to the Spanish language
-
Maybe you should continue your drama in this thread rather than start a new one here with even more speculation, conjecture, half-truths and completely false information... https://forum.dcs.world/topic/348848-razbam-situation-what-is-the-status/
-
Most people today don't even know that the word "patience" exists...
-
I very much doubt that Aerges or their SME's are limited to the Spanish language...
-
I don't hold my breath... But just because no Dev has commented on it doesn't mean we'll never get a Jaguar. No developer has talked much about an F-104 either, although many have wanted one for a long time. And look, Aerges is developing one. One does not mean the other.
-
Why shouldn't there be a Jaguar at some point (regardless of the developer)? Are there no documentaries or secret documentation about the plane?
-
You know the story of Don Quijote...?
-
Razbam modules are not dead until ED and Razbam say they are. This has not happened so far for obvious reasons. All we know at the moment is that the development and maintenance of new or existing modules has been paused. Nothing more and nothing less. Could the worst case scenario happen? Sure, it can. But so far this is not the case, even if many are acting as if it already is. However, for my part, I won't say/write anything more about it and will simply avoid this thread. I'll wait and see what happens and continue to have fun with DCS, because there's nothing I can do about the situation either way.
-
The fact that this thread now has 63 pages can only be explained by the absolute determination of those involved to imagine the worst or even wish for the worst. We simply do not have enough reliable information about the matter between ED and Razbam to discuss it meaningfully. You're all just going round in circles without anything constructive coming out of it. But patience has never been a human strength... (at least for most)
-
As much as I would like to have an F-111, I think HB has more than enough to do with the A-6, the support for the Eutofighter and the support of the existing modules (Viggen, Tomcat and Phantom) for the next few years.
-
ALCM shoud be fine
-
If you have deactivated (or not activated) the mouse for the jester wheel in the special options, entering numbers in the field hardly ever works (problems with the focus). You must currently have activated mouse for the Jester Wheel. Afaik HB is working on a solution. Edit: too late @Zabuzard was quicker
-
This might interest you. Really very well done training campaign https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3334349/
-
As far as I know, the fastest method is "ALCM", a stored heading alignment (must be set in the editor for the mission, afaik). This takes about 90 seconds. If you want a full alignment, the only option is a hot start or a cold start with the full 8 minute alignment.
-
I assume that this will be added in the future.
-
It works as intended.