Jump to content

gospadin

Members
  • Posts

    1984
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by gospadin

  1. I think it'd be awesome. Packed dirt or gravel construction. Select runway length and orientation in the ME. Small percent chance of FOD destroying your airplane. Helos could deliver weapons and fuel to allow rearming/refueling.
  2. Holy geezus those EA-6Bs are sexy!
  3. :thumbsup:
  4. Does the L-39C model weapon pylon strength? (If someone added 500kg bombs on the C via a mod, would they shear off at high G loads?)
  5. A-10C is backwards from (most) everything else in DCS.
  6. To a western person, right = up (opposite of your first rule) is more "natural" IMO. The other suggestions I agree with. All planes except the A-10C already follow right=up I believe. Maybe we just need a UI option to toggle the behavior.
  7. Sorry, but it is extremely unlikely that we'll ever be able to implement advanced avionics or a glass cockpit.
  8. If you figure this out, I would love to know. We want to enable buddy refueling for our A-4 mod when the D-704 is equipped.
  9. Yup. Placing panel seams for the 3rd time I have a way better eye for how my reference photos line up.
  10. What's funny is that we've had to re-do our unwrap from scratch a 2nd time, hopefully this unwrap survives to the end. bye bye liveries!
  11. Imgur.com is free and works well with this the ED forums, plus it's very easy to use. They will generate [ IMG ] links for you that you can easily copy.
  12. That template is unofficial, and has some errors with the latest 1.5.x/2.x MiG-21 model/unwrap. Cobra stated the official template will be released this month. (The unofficial template will still "mostly" work but will require some debug)
  13. Cobra said their official paint kit was going to arrive in March, so might want to wait a week or so before starting.
  14. I've noticed the same thing. The FBW implementation seems to have a big deadzone in it, which is annoying because the transition out of the deadzone feels really unnatural.
  15. Resizing the view window has no effect until you restart the modelviewer.
  16. or a good supply of drugs.
  17. Thx! Saved it for the future!
  18. Are you saying that radio communication between players should be integrated? In that case, I vote yes. Huge boost to realism. The one downside is that since not all aircraft have the same radio capabilities, there will be mixes of aircraft that cannot talk to each other. Communications between such aircraft would need to be communicated through an AWACS or GCI that can work with all radio frequencies. I have no interest in commanding AI / voice recognition. I'm okay with selecting from a menu for stuff like that.
  19. For now you can fake it with my beacon mod, and placing a runway object out there. You won't be able to land on it, but you can pretend...
  20. sorry, i was just eyeballing it You could always make your own font!
  21. Possibly, but i'm sure we'll see more period-correct servers over time as the stable of possible planes grows.
  22. Odds are you'd have some weapon release capability flying by yourself, with an AI BN. Gunners on the huey are pretty good, no reason basic BN capability wouldn't work when controlled by AI too. Sure, when you're "in the mix" and targets are popping up left and right you'd be at a disadvantage by yourself, but that's not a huge deal.
  23. sweet, thx! (i noticed that you updated a number of textures in the last stable push)
  24. IMO, this could just come down to mission zone triggers "if pilot in zone and altitude < 1000m" kind of stuff, to be the trigger for having taken the pictures needed or whatever.
×
×
  • Create New...