Coxy_99

null

Please for the love of god remove that stupid trial only users allowed it looks so tacky and cheap..........

This effect is good gives a more dynamic look.

Youtube video's are not data.

ALL SARH in dcs (Even nato ones) missiles have a memory mode. Nothing more nothing less, HOJ is possible to also.

Let me help: Multipalyer: Player one: sees no cloud around said target. Player two: sees and is behind clouds. Player one: fires IR missile at player two. Player two: gets hit by IR missile. Player one: Gets his target. Player two: Checks tracks and cries on ED forums IR missile hit me through clouds.

I watched the tracks also yes. This is because these rwrs are 1:1 null nullSorry for the spam 5MB upload

You dont have to be good at notching a 120 with these rwr's, Correct me if im wrong, I dont read tacviews very well but your 89 off to the missile, If thats the case thats a perfect 90. You even adjust to what the rwr is even telling you. And this is why the missile didnt see you and went for chaff. Once again to elaborate i apologise to reading the tacview wrong if that was the case. null

nullnull

Would be a cool skin to add.

Im to seeing them do 180 degrees and tracking you in the oppasite direction on rwr and spo. Im not sure if thats even possible whatever. After all the complaints missile acts how it should.

Always liked the less snow effect or the frozen ground. Going to have to try these.

Nice work guys. Just noticed i can now post cat gifs in the forums, Bad move by ED that one.

null

Yea HOJ however just putting the point in that aim-7 is not useless (Off topic) But back to AIM-54 before i get told off and points on my name.

Im a cat and i dis approve of 10nm sparrow shots.................. nullnull nullnull

My mate in a pub told me when he fired an aim-54 it did Mach 6 i must tell Heatblur, On a serious note the new updates are cool, Still more than happy you guys are putting into this keep up the good work Anymore updates to come just out of curiosity? Or we nearing the final stage?

Its the expectation thats the issue. Adapt and overcome what is changed and dealt to you. (Not you in particular) But in general to all.

You only have to watch many people pitch up 10 15 degrees with all actives trying to create that loft, Thats an user error although i personally have never pre lofted aim54s and still found them shooting to the moon. Glad its fixed this patch tho.

64GB gives a far more smoother experience, Anyone saying 16GB is fine needs a head wobble. I was seeing the exact same thing 99% usage out of 32GB. (Not sure why this is) And its no memory leak? I think ED should really update there recommendations for PC specs.

nullnull

Last time i asked i may not be 100% But the maps polygon count was to high to add it. Unless things changed since.

Textures in pit are a little on the dark side not a big fan of that (Sure someone will make a mod) Pilot body how can you complain we dont have a pilot body yet, This could be a place holder? Flight model? You must be an SME obviously with a ton of data to prove the flight model is wrong? Key bindings i believe is a bug, But i guess none like the clicky clicky pit? Saying that key bind is awkward from 60 to 7nm skipping 35nm.

SD-10 is by far the best performing missile in DCS right now in time, It needs to be moved to the new API,Then see what changes it has, I wouldnt say ignored but not even got round to it yet. As working of a priority list. As for the thread, Both aircraft are multi role, Both are not A/A superior fighters. You be looking at F-15 for that stuff. But we already knew that.

Theres no difference you just said so yourself they all miss aim120 is aim120. 120 will never see the helo. Now try the same test in STT and watch 120 hit.