Bogey Jammer

But was ms Flight a true simulator ? :D

Salt damage, UV damage, paint flaking and coat layers, rust, dust, decomposition, … It is currently so well rendered and believable that I would almost like to pick some mushrooms from the screenshots. But given the time when the A version was used, will its textures will be more fresh looking ?

That joystick is in a very sick condition, looks like it will brittle to dust in any minute.

What teases me the most is the interactive walk to the aircraft, and boarding sequence. This is the perhaps the most satisfying moment, just like IRL when you board into a Ferrari for the first time (and probably the last time). Why is it never implemented in any simulator ?

The T-Rudder is in stock now so there are chances that it will be good this time.

RSBN and PRMG beacons were first implemented in the Caucasus map just for the MiG-21 module. Can we think about an additional set of ADF beacons that are activated, seen and used exclusively by all these old generation aircraft ? Something like infrastructure layers. I too am attracted by the genuine limitations of old hardware and using it as designed, that's the point, otherwise I would always fly the F-15C.

How's that poisonous: They just have passed the first week of missed first expected release date, if we ever can call it a date. Feature complete. Just ONE WEEK, and they are the most horrible biz ever not less ??? While we are still waiting for core features for YEARS from others ? WOW dude I'm quite sure your grotesque exaggeration is at the top level of the toxicometer :mad: :music_whistling: Because I suspect your profile is a double one, and I don't consider your matter as an opinion, it's been a pleasure to target you :smilewink:

Here comes the whiner. I knew it would happen :megalol: A 3 posts guy with a nice conclusion. Very convincing… :Flush:

This is actually the primary issue : dates… Hopeless addicted people are always asking "when" every minute, and sadly developers provide obviously badly estimated dates, provoking seizures to self-sacralized customers if the deadline is not met (or seeming to not going to be met). They should never give estimations nor damn dates. It too often been a communication failure here on DCS. But what I found best is to provide the number of tasks done, the ones to come, and draw a graph showing the progression over time to let every one to get own estimation of the release time frame. There is relatively a extremely little time left to wait for the MiG-19 module (next ones on my shopping list require years to wait), will people be intelligent enough to keep calm if a mere week delay is added ?

The way I asked that question is for people out there thinking the feature was considered complete for release. Basically because of the imminent release time frame, people tend to think that everything showed now in the media is likely to be exactly how it will look in the final product, until the contrary is officially specified :

Is there any possibility for Razbam to retexture Belsimtek's MiG-15 ? :shifty:

Apparently there are some complaints about the radar rendition in the last WIP video. With some valid points to be honest. So, at release, are there chances that the radar modeling will be more convincing ?

wow it's more impressive than the exterior ! :thumbup:

Another question: How adjustable the initial conditions will be ? Will we be able to setup the factions and units to use from our choices ?

Can you stop talking about money in those forums please? you all know nothing about the amount, and workforce needed to do this and ED asked for nothing (yet). Just wait and see damn it :mad: About the ATO system, I'm more worried about the AI that currently doesn't follow mission plans to the letter. Will the AI have to be overhauled before a completion of the dynamic campaign system ?

The position of the light source over dramatize the effect, I guess it's to show that the texture has life. Other picture of a more completed work will help to judge the harmony. Pre-ordering is pointless. Don't expect accurate release date either.

The wings' armpits bulge curvature are still to be tweaked :prop:

Well… I learnt something today :D

Maybe the thickness is correct and it's only the leading edge which is too flat/round ? Quite obvious to me too.

There should be a sticky topic saying: — Russian law prohibit the full fidelity simulation of currently servicing aircraft — Impossible to create any module without available documentation of the aircraft — Due to secrecy, you'll never see a generation 5 aircraft. — So no F-22 — No F-35 — No Rafale — No Su-35 — No Pak-fa — No Tiger — No anything younger than MiG-23 from the red side

Excellent video. I'm quite disappointed by the rockets effectiveness, that will be hard to find other jobs than interception with that aircraft. So final cockpit textures will be released afterwards, yeah ok why not. But I still will wait to see the final product before opening my wallet anyway.

Is it a museum ? Why are they keeping so many unusable airframes ? Soviet Su-7 are present too :shocking:

Thanks for the clarification :thumbup:

I fear that the cockpit's front textures are the last things to be finalized, yet it's what I want to see the most. Is it going to be looking as amazingly good as the exterior ? :D

Just this sentence proves that you're misinformed, or simply, de très mauvaise foi.