Bogey Jammer

Why the cockpit guncam was preferred for training purpose ?

I'm surprised to read that so many high rank officers have time to review a game… If it's true the module would worth its price. If it's not, that announcement would be a lame excuse for what happened with it. Time will tell :music_whistling: (yes I'm still skeptical, partly due to the tone used in this announcement)

AKS ? :wassat:

Hello all, It's tempting, but how better does the 2.5.1 version run now ?

Thanks for explaining the hard to see details. This is exactly what I wanted to know.

no, please

I was joking. It's good indeed to have development updates of a pre-paid product, it helps other to make the decision to pre-buy it and this helps trust. But honestly I don't care a lot about development updates, I prefer to discover the whole thing when I put my hands on it. Moreover the development is so slow that even highly frequent updates can't suppress the hype torture. But, what is more important for me would be development updates about post-released product fixing. The todo list gets bigger everyday.

You mean that you are happy to have bought development updates ?

There is no other link than being in the same family, Indo-European languages, just like English and Russian. For me Farsi is totally unintelligible, but it sounds nice indeed. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/IndoEuropeanTree.svg

Please, let this topic die in peace…

Where comes this recent tendency to ask for FC3 new modules ?

It would be good for immersion, but bad for interaction for non Farsi speakers. I don't really like to have to read subtitles written at the screen's corner while dogfighting… In Arma 3 I still don't get any single word when I play within the Persian faction.

Hello, I still don't get what is INS alignment process exactly… Given the fact that it drifts anyway, and the position can be updated while flying or waiting on the carrier's deck, doesn't it consist to just spool up gyros and tell the computer this is now that position/heading/altitude ? Must the gyro be in a specific position according to the aircraft's position before flying ?

No army in the world would accept that. However, this is looking perfect for rendering fog and implement it for better realism :thumbup:

Actually this might be a problem. The Adobe RBG colorspace is too specific for some applications. sRGB is the standard so you may have oversaturated colors.

Pressing "OK" is like taking the red pill I guess…

Ah, the joy of a place where opinions are free and not segregated… The MiG-21 subforum is the perfect example of natural human behavior when both the product and communication quality reach a level inferior to average. This is a hating topic too btw. I'd rather not see it in the first place. This module doesn't deserve it anyway.

I voted the thread's rate instead of voting the poll :lol:

You don't know what your are talking about and you can't because there is nothing available about sales data for public, especially about something that has not been released yet. There is no medical personnel here either to confirm if this fraction of the screen can cause more seizure than FPS drops of the whole monitor to sensitive people that are probably non existent in gaming by nature. I bet that trailer videos are more dangerous to our poor eyes than a green-on-blue non flashing HUD display. Actually people like you are hiding behind these arguments the fact that you are too lazy to assume 100% possible realism (note the word possible). That turns the whole topic ridiculous, especially when we know that real pilots got used to it. Just wait to try it before wanting to reduce the so long awaited realism.

It's simple, people get angry when the most obvious issues are not fixed for years. This module is one of the most mature and is not the most hated though.

Same here. I'd like to know if the 1.5 branch will be still available for download as announced previously. EDIT: 1.5.8.13504 Update 2 is for the Open beta branch only yet. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3365690&postcount=63

A screenshot map has been published somewhere on the user files repository or the forums, but I can't remember how big was the zoom factor. The file was too big to handle anyway… There are differences on key locations coordinates. Some airbases are misplaced if real coordinates a compared. I once tried to locate the Tbilissi aircraft factory and found that the urban areas are too different in shape from reality to use a real map for assistance. I don't know if DCS 2.5 adjusted the coordinate system to better fit reality. Anyway the big screenshot is the best solution to date.

I just had to look at your diagram for less than half of a second to understand everything :smartass: Thank you for all your detailed explanations :thumbup:

Mine ? it about this :

Victory :v: but… What are local/relative pitch angles ? :dontgetit: