Bogey Jammer

I don't agree with that. There is no distance discrimination at all. The light blinks only when a radar ray passes over the sensor. In DCS, the frequency is artificially doubled to "simulate" the radar mode switching in TWS mode, with any aircraft type, always at the same distance. Which is another lame trick.

Use a blank picture ?

You have to look at yourself better than that. Of course your posts are informative but you always ruin the effort with aggressive and sarcastic formulas. Trump style without the power, so it seems that the amount of harassment makes them prefer to ditch the communication with the stone in their shoe. They are humans after all, and whatever they've done with their business, they still deserve respect. You're not alone, a couple of other Sacred Customers got ignored after having crossed the line. I'd suggest you should go neutral before you become your own caricature, making more harm to your reputation rather than Razbam's. I'm permanently out of this OT discussion now, peace.

I'm not asking that much (film format) but indeed it would be even more interesting in that way :smilewink:

The tone you use typically severs diplomatic relations. That may explain why :music_whistling:

In the dedicated subforum, there's already a dedicated topic on this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=232651

You get both haptic feedback and sound with your mouse button when you click on the cockpit controls :D Perfect balance is MiG-19P, with "normal" switches sounds, and animations which I like very much. The Mirage has nothing of that, and I just noticed it now. I agree that it's a subjective matter.

Here comes CFD

There is a thread about how bad are F-14's sounds. From what I heard from the videos, I can say that I just hate the cringy overdramatized buttons and switches sounds and the cheesy afterburner in-cockpit sound (the same as Viggen's and MiG-21bis'). If you ask for that kind of stuff, Razbam can keep the sounds as they are now.

Candid question: what about asking to Mikoyan Gurevich Design Bureau directly ?

Duplicate of https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=236390

I'm curious about the design process to create such a product. How is it done ? What takes time ?

Good report, good news. If the Harrier gets focus, do we have to wait longer for anything related to avionics like Mirage MLO ? I wish the best for Razbam to finish that Harrier, now I'm obliged to follow its development closely :shifty:

Because of this ? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3853431&postcount=1

I'm also not convinced at all that transonic buffeting is related to trimming. Radar presence and CoG position have almost nothing to do with it (MiG-19S = MiG-19P because of same wing) http://www.razvanapetrei.com/rupdate-transonic-buffeting/

I love to read that kind of report :thumbup: Indisputable quality now :punk:

Be careful of these old photos, results can show more sensitive brightness in low light conditions. Muzzle flash in military equipment should be minimal, big flashes is for hollywood crap. This old classic shows day/night difference:

Is it a sneak peak of the V2 cockpit ? :suspect:

Because the equivalent state of the MiG-19 was roughly 2 years ago. And I think it will be longer for the MiG-23. Not the same avionics complexity, the Achille's heel of Razbam.

Don't use the basic weather system, it got atmospheric issues. The advanced one is more realistic, even when 100% clear.

+1 You can use your spreadsheet software to find the coefficients for a polynomial regression very easily. However the external stores have a huge impact on this aircraft's flight dynamics, but I suspect the main criterion is the CoG position, to be verified.

I think I get what you mean, but in this case, we perfectly know what it is about, the graphics overhaul, no problem about that. The positive thing is that we have the confirmation that it's really being worked on, and quite near the end than the beginning. All of this is good news. Now the artist wants to show his masterpiece in the most effective moment, when it's done. Nothing wrong about that too :dunno: Better to half ignore that kind of announcement because you know that you are likely to be disappointed.

I don't see any problem here, at least we are informed that a milestone is going to be released in the coming months, which is THE new to be focused at. Indeed, the pictures tells nothing (except the VRAM will be overflowed by such ultra fine definition…) but again, it doesn't matter since there is still a long time to wait for the final result anyway.

How to ruin a topic…

The MiG-19 is not finalized yet, and there is still two years to wait for a MiG-23 release.