Jump to content

Bogey Jammer

Members
  • Posts

    780
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bogey Jammer

  1. I hope they will have enough time to post some gameplay videos. This module seems under promoted.
  2. Perhaps some screenshots playing with sun lighting and cast shadows would help to appreciate the work better. The most unnatural thing, which is not M3 fault's are the specular reflections visible on parts where light is blocked. Unfortunately, such cockpit design makes it obvious… like the glowing black ball…
  3. I can't find the source anymore but I've kept in mind something about wave band used specifically by doppler radars, that the old RWRs are not tuned to.
  4. Let's add another month again to the wait… :yawn:
  5. Emissions from doppler type radars.
  6. I don't remember if I have already asked this question but is the RWR capable of detecting doppler emissions ?
  7. But… for the armchair pilots of us, performance specs (and flight data records) are much more believable than some big mouthed RL pilots :huh:
  8. There should be a sticky topic saying: — Russian law prohibit the full fidelity simulation of currently servicing aircraft — Impossible to create any module without available documentation of the aircraft — Due to secrecy, you'll never see a generation 5 aircraft. — So no F-22 — No F-35 — No Rafale — No Su-35 — No Pak-fa — No Tiger — No anything younger than MiG-23 from the red side
  9. no way, it's like comparing Herbie Hancock with Miki Minaj The current price is set by the people who done the job, so only them know precisely to set the price according to real facts and values. AAA games, other ultra niche elitist addons on civilian sims, charity marketing pretexts (please, let me decide what laboratory I want to found, at least the ones I know) don't help to progress, its BS and non valid arguments. The price looks fair indeed, DCS devs luckily respect people and they apparently are doing a present with this. So in my case I'll gladly accept that humbly and not bragging I still have money to offer like a sect member fanatic. Anyway, Heatblur, ED, people are totally opened to any of your desires, charge them 180€ next time for their fix… the others that still need to check the product value for money are a nuisance.
  10. External parts I guess
  11. Virtual realistically speaking, good performance in 2.5 will come in the future, so I guess I'm still living in the present :smartass:
  12. Damn, some people are literally asking to pay more ? is it a SM forum or what ??
  13. Well, if VR performance is the most important thing, like me, use DCS 1.5 :D Saves a lot of money
  14. DCS playing is expensive. Period.
  15. "quite acceptable" LOL anyway, let's wait for the next announced updates. SPO-10 overhaul is what I'd like to see first, can't wait to not detect doppler radars anymore :D
  16. Good news :thumbup:
  17. :cry:
  18. Like if you already spent hundred of hours to beat the crap out of all the modules you got… "I want to consume, consume consuuuuuuume, gimme moooore"
  19. The most obvious bug for me are the unscattered sun rays by the cloud :shifty:
  20. The F/A-18 ? that fast ?? :shocking: What does it sacrifice to get so much power available ?
  21. Isn't it a constantly spinning radar antenna ? It looks like a power switching noise to me…
  22. It's a MiG-21bis, not a MiG-21F.
  23. This random noise coming from the rotating antenna would be a nice immersive addition.
  24. Weird… why the map rotates too ? Should the compass rotate alone between modes ?
  25. About gunfighter Mk.II in Europe:
×
×
  • Create New...