Rlaxoxo

You need to deploy gears to incrase the drag when on approach to landing

Encountered similar problems

You chose between TAS or RDR ALT ... you dont need both

If you die from a mirage in a bvr combat with an Su-27 you need more practice

Dat response time

I've read that somewhere when I asked about this problem before hell if I can find it again : /

You're still able to fire then IRL but the computer won't be able to calculate the correct impact point

Good question

Thanks! I have a question tho ... Does this system warn you as soon as the missile enters the cone while it's engine is burning or does it only detect the launch? If so will rolling the aircraft after the missile has been fired from below you for example (Blind Spot) and in turn making the missile enter the FoV of the sensor will warning then be issued as it's engine is sill burning?

Same for me but I don't really mind doing it this way tbh From Manual: ZBI - Used in conjunction with the IP to calculate impact point. This mode depends on the INS. Didn't use it so far

BAD BUT ofc

Delay Cost Simulator

Not sure if you understood what I was saying or not I'm saying it should DEFAULT-ly be turned ON and if you don't want it you CAN turn it OFF Which is how it works atm while others were trying to say that it should be by DEFAULT OFF etc

So because of a few that that do not prefer this feature it should be disabled as a default so most of the community do not use this feature unless they explicitly turn it on which any average mission builder will forget to do .... thus making this work kinda meaningless I'm sorry but I disagree with that it's much more logical to turn it off if you don't like it rather then having to turn it on to have it enabled.

If user can decide if he wants to put it or what stops them putting it on if they're in "Realistic" mission Good choice tbh we're all really edgy in 1 regard

This is nice

Don't be so modest You're the one who made it all work after all ^^

Nevada has this problem if you have another Mig-21 near you your frames just drop dead If you're further a bit then you're fine

What's strange is that I couldn't replicate this bug when I spawned at Groom Lake (Area 51) But if I spawn in Nellis I can reproduce it without any effort

If you land slightly above 160 knots or to slow to takeoff you brake your tires and this looks weird. I'm not certain exactly what's the endurance of the real deal but it looked strange

I don't know man this entire topic is kinda going on my nerves to be honest ... It feels so pointless to argue over this like "Put an option to limit it only when you have ground ordinates ..." So it wouldn't be "Abused" in A2A which if you kinda take a look at it isn't even realistic lol I have different way of thinking towards this and while I do understand the concept of realism people strive for i find it funny that people seam to ignore so many examples like this one here but way worse just because they didn't know how it was built at the time and now they kinda got used to it ... And now a Developer which in fact lets be honest didn't have to write this post here explaining how he did it and stuff but he did it nonetheless seam to ignited this "Fire" into some people saying that it's not realistic and that they're worried that devs are not striving for realism ... D2M was planned in the design for the Aircraft ... It has the systems onboard It had the capability for it ... But if you look at it there wasn't really any need for it since it was an intercept variant of the aircraft and look down sensors that could "Maybe" detect a IR launch wasn't worth the price or the politics of Air Combat at the time ... So I don't see what's the bug fuss about it and WHY is this looked down upon as a non "Realistic" feature. Take a look around the sim and you'll find alot more of example of this ... Missiles are crap ... F-15 can go into space without any engine issues. F-15 can pull 12G's all day with no structure damage what so ever ... I mean look at DCS ECM ... it's practically crap compared to what it can really do ... Yet everyone seams "fine" with this and it buggs me I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I think that's one of my strong suites when it comes to handling my way of thinking but that doesn't mean I have to agree to them. I honestly think that bickering about this topic is completely useless but at the end of the day that's also my opinion so you don't have to agree with it ether I don't know what else to say ... Is there even a point to this? I guess not ... I think I'm done trying to engage on this topic since my point on this is clear and it's obvious me saying anything won't really change much anyway plus I don't believe it can end well for me anyways Who knows since people might see this as a "mockery" for stating my opinion I might get banned as well. And if I get banned for stating my opinion & telling people to look around them selfs before you start complaining about something then so be it ...

You can see the engine is working cus the wings are rocking back and forth like they normally do when you're idle It's just sound mysteriously disappears ...

Imagine if we all had to pay for our fuel and repairs when we get back lol I bet some hardcore simmers out there that find these things not "Realistic" will actually love that. 4$/10L of fuel (To balance it out) I bet they're gonna treasure their Fuel then and be careful how much they load pier mission ... Better yet let's start paying the loadout and see how many A-10's will have the full 6 mavs 10 bombs , 6 rocket launcher load outs that cost >1 mil $ While on this topic should we also remove the Mirage ECM box from the aircraft as well? Cus it normally doesn't sit there unless you have a ECM pod. Or have you got used to it by now that you probably didn't even know about that like many other things in DCS sim ...? Or wh .... . .. ... Oh who am I kidding what's the point of this ... Me trying understand someone who thinks on a completely different wave length then me ...