Jonne

Die MiG-21 hat extern sowohl einen Gleichstrom- als auch einen Wechselstromanschluss. Wobei meistens nur Gleichstrom angeschlossen wird. Beide Stecker liegen nebeneinander links unterhalb der Flügelkante. Wechselstrom braucht man, da die Wechselrichter nicht genügend Strom liefern um z.B. das Radar am Boden zu testen. Bordnetz hat die MiG-21 beides, was aber auch wenig mit modern oder nicht zu tun hat.

Der Maverick CTD hatte es in die Stable geschafft und das ist so ziemlich der schwerste Bug, den ich aus der OpenBeta kenne.

Digital Combat Simulator Can not find the word heavy in there. And the Bronco will be a nice addition to the mid cold war era.

Please please please do not make it another airquake server. Weapon selection based on service years is a nice addition to realism. Weapon selection for balancing not so much.

JG-1_Jonne - MiG-21bis Looking forward to the event!

"Die" sind aber ganz andere als "die von der F-14".

Ja, aber nach jetzigem Stand ist MAC kein Teil von DCS, sondern ein eigenes Spiel. Und somit fällt diese Grundlage flach.

Sollten MAC und DCS nicht komplett getrennt sein? Somit gibt es absolut kein aufeinandertreffen von DCS und MAC Flugzeugen.

Ohne mich jetzt festlegen zu können, denn leider finde ich das ganze nicht mehr wieder, war es wohl so, dass nur wenn beide Pylone elektrisch verbunden sind, die Bomben abgeworfen werden können.

Das Video habe ich irgendwo schon einmal mit Kommentaren gesehen (vielleicht sogar irgendwo hier?!). Fazit war, dass selbst diese Abwurfmethode mit einer standard MiG-21 nicht möglich ist. Warscheinlich sind die freien Aufhängungen elektrisch gebrückt.

The JF-17 is in the works and that one is a couple of years newer then the Eurofighter.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=222245 Here is a good start.

Die Klappen einer Yak-52 sind mechanisch über eine Welle verbunden, von daher sollte keine Klappe ein Eigenleben entwickeln.

It is some time ago, but I tested the 8x FAB-100 and 2X FAB-500 against bridges and was more succesful with the FAB-100 load. Also in a level bombing scenario, the FAB-100 do spread a significant amount when the speed is high.

Screenshots seem to be all imperial, maybe it is an option.

Thank you for the update, unfortunately my wingman now stops at the same position and the Su-25 will line up behind him after I take off.

The only reason I use the parallel taxiway is, because they block the other. On the first try I was stuck behind them on A and then turned around to get to W.

So not using ATC does not change anything, maybe I am really just to fast. Anyway I do not really see the reason for the Su-25 stopping, as they are pretty far away from me when I start to taxi. I have included a screenshot of the position where they stop. On this I am in the background on taxiway W to avoid them, but my wingman of course does not.

I will try that, although I do not think he will be able to pass the two stuck Su-25. Shall I refrain from using the ATC?

Thank you for the MiG-21 campaign. An aircraft that somehow did not really get alot of love SP wise. I have completed the first 3 missions, but now I am somehow a bit stuck on number 4. For some reason the Su-25 flight gets stuck on the taxiway towards runway 33 and my wingman behind them. I can taxi to the runway using a different taxiway, but the other aircraft will never move again. The same thing actually happened already on mission 3, but did not effect the outcome.

Can confirm that.

So since the update on Thursday the canopy ejectors are always shown deployed. You can easily test that yourself by getting into a cold and dark aircraft. The canopy is closeable though, so it seems to be only a visual bug. The bugtracker does not have the recent DCS version yet, so I was unable to report it through there.

Again have you ever dropped a RN-24 without exploding? No? Then do not try to convince us it is working as it should. Even if it is not a fully moduled nuke, it should atleast be usable as in the real procedures, which it currently is not as the blast radius is well above what it should be.

Did you actually try that yourself with the RN-24? Because that looks pretty much like my last try with it and it still killed me. Actually I have not once been able to use the 24 without exploding, while ground damage was minimal. The RN-28 is a different story though.

The jamming part is working although not super effective. Automatic release of countermeasures is broken though. However jamming does not help you a lot in the MiG-21, as it will be burned through before you are in range. Tested it online on a private server against a Mirage.