Jump to content

Jonne

Members
  • Posts

    608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jonne

  1. A small list, not that I am not already repeating what was written again and again: -ASP completly different in behaviour than the real world, including arcade style CCIP mode for bombing -SPO-10 not giving direction on lock, as opposed to the real thing -All missiles except the R-60 and R-60M are broken and not just underperforming as you say -Hard coded 2G limit in stall condition -NPP broken -DA-200 broken -Jammer broken So if half of the procedures described in the real world manual are just not working, because systems are either broken or modelled incorrectly, then yes, this is not a study sim.
  2. Jonne

    DA-200

    I think you are confusing the ends of the course needle. The broad end points towards the set course, not the narrow end.
  3. Actually there is a really simple answer to this question: The Serbian skin is the first in the list. As there are no countries assigned to the skins, the MiG-21bis is available to all countries with all skins.
  4. But that is mostly for Vietnam. You can still see nearly all former S-75 sites in the former Soviet Union very easy spotable via Google Earth.
  5. There is a barely visible mark between the 4 and the 2. I would guess this is the target.
  6. Thank you! That is very helpful for building realistic sites!
  7. Yesterday I was playing around with S-75 and S-125 sites combined with the P-19, which is the only available SR for both. It does seem to work with both types, however the performance of both the S-75 and S-125 was even with the SR rather low. One S-125 site completely ignored a B-52 flying right above it at 12000m. The S-125 will also work without the P-19, something I want to test today with the S-75 too. Detection without a SR is of course pretty bad. A bit OT: Does someone know where a SR would typically be located for a S-125 site? I have found that info for the S-75, but not the S-125.
  8. Definately my number one on the wishlist!
  9. Nur die Chilenischen C-101BB sollten ein Radar haben. Wie das in dem Modul aussieht, keine Ahnung.
  10. With the AJS only beeing an avionics update of the AJ, I do not see any problem there anyway. If you remove the weapons (Maverick etc.) from the upgraded version you have a very near AJ 37 simulation. The harrier is a complete different case, as the performance is way above the cold war era versions. Something I only learned today after SwedishWaffles post.
  11. Just to throw in another point for consideration: The BK90 is a late 80's weapon, so might not really fit into the current F-5E vs. MiG-21bis setting.
  12. With yesterdays update, the clean canopy mod I am using fails the integrity check. As there still is no clean canopy option in the module, is there any other mod working?
  13. Hello, as you can see, my singature image has a white background, which it should not have. The orginal on my mashine is transparent, but it this is lost when I upload it through the signature options. I h ave tried all possible formats without any change. Do I need to upload the image externally to keep the transperancy? If yes, what uploader shall I use? Regards Jonne
  14. Unfortunately not
  15. Where? I can only find an option for the IR arcade mode, but not for unrealstic bombing.
  16. Ein wenig muss ich hier widersprechen, Leatherneck bzw. jetzt M3 hält sich nicht an diesen Grundsatz. Deswegen gibt es hier den Arcade Mode für IR und fake CCIP, letzteres lässt sich noch nicht einmal abschalten. Auch die Bewaffnung ist teils weit weg von realistisch, denn weder RS-2US, noch Kh-66 können von dem Radar der Bis gelenkt werden und auch die Zusatzkannonen gab es an der Bis nicht. Hier würde ich mir ein eingreifen von ED wünschen.
  17. Auch der Vergleich zwischen F-13 und bis ist interessant. Da würde ich mich ja schon über ein F-13 Modul freuen um das ganze mal in DCS erfahren zu können.
  18. Really? Must have missed that. What time was that?
  19. I sincerly hope that as soon as the crazy hype train for the Hornet has derailed, people will come back to your server and enjoy your great missions in a great setting.
  20. Are you sure? Because I am pretty sure that even though the 54 slots were filled, teams were not balanced in numbers, however I never counted through the list of aircraft on the master server, so maybe they just have not been displayed right.
  21. At least every time I looked, the server was flooded with Hornets and all server slots were taken, so there was no possibility for RED to stack up. I was only able to join once Friday evening. Might have also not helped, that sometimes half of the RED team consisted of Mi-8 and Yak-52.
  22. Das ist doch die MiG-21 in dem Video?!
  23. Most of the campaign still seems to work with 2.5. Actually the only bugs I have encountered yet are, that the NATO forces have no faction and that the pop up mission briefing is to long to be fully displayed.
  24. Nein, leider hilft dies nicht. Auch wenn die Yak-52 tatsächlich recht lange braucht um warm zu werden, die DCS Yak-52 kam bei mir bisher nie über den gelben bereich hinaus.
×
×
  • Create New...