Darkbrotherhood7

Am I crazy or the MIG-29A has PFM now? I mean, the way how it taxi and the FM looks different.

Cuz it was not necessary.

Congrats to all! :)

1+

No, the F-14B had a new RWR, and of course, new engines.

1+++

MI-8, here we go...

Yeah, that would be a 'step backward'. :)

1- The F-14B had the same F-14A avionics, except by the RWR. 2- As far I know, some F-14As were upgraded to the F-14A+(later in 1991 F-14B)standard, and some were brand new F-14Bs, not upgraded. 3- the F-14B was implemented in 1987. If you want more details, check this link: http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-history-f14b.htm

Honestly, all I want is DCS: Alaska. I would love to fly fast and low over the Alaska cold mountains. Actually, DCS: Siberia would be awesome.

Nice!

Very nice! :)

I'm not sure about it, buddy! Read this: [ame]https://www.ida.org/idamedia/Corporate/Files/Publications/IDA_Documents/SED/ida-document-d-4642.pdf[/ame] There is a difference. :)

The Su-30SM and Su-35S are being mostly used to A/G strikes and sometimes to escort the Su-34s, probably because the Su-34 is also capable of A/A missions. Back on topic, the Su-33 actually has an IRST, not EOS.

Thanks for the update, Wags! Looking forward to the 2.5 :)

Thanks for clarifying, Skate!:thumbup:

Wow, bad news. It's all about the business!

There's no one attacking you or trying to make you the bad guy, Buddy! :-) As Cobra said, let's keep on topic, and if there's any problem/bug with the MiG-21 training, let's reported it. :)

It's not unrealistic, in real life the AMRAAM does not create smoke. At least not like the R-27/77

It's not worth to make different variants, at least in my opinion.

Pitot- Cobra wasn't being rude to you.

This! Leatherneck is giving their best to the DCS community, not everyone will be happy with the tutorial.

As Wags says,"Everything is subject to change". With that being said, yeah maybe DCS can be more than a flight sim in the future, but but personally, I hope not.

1+ This!!!