Dehuman

Su-33K was proposal to China. I think they'll stay in service on the Kuznetsov until the airframes have reached their end of life. This will probably be before the Kuznetsov is finally replaced/complemented.

Functionality on these please By this yes I mean IRAAMs Function for "special uplink" and addition of C-24 rockets (my favourite, there's a ballistic setting already) a happy bonus. Actually the words "No function" come up a lot in the manual so if that could get reduced that'd be swell.

L-39 really is a pleasure to fly, it can't be stated enough. I have only had it since the last sale and my only regret is not getting it sooner. Multi-crew is a blast and having an extra set of eyes in the cockpit is great in combat. Speaking of combat, nothing beats the feeling of punishing people silly enough to take their supersonic "real fighter" into a turn fight against you.

This? https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=230460

Profile for A-4E-C available here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=230959

Here we go: https://www.dropbox.com/s/mf5mla7iwmenc1a/DCS_BIOS_A-4E-C.zip?dl=0 or https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3303312/ Beta v1.01 I have done testing but it will take me moths to test every single function so forgive me if some bugs have gotten through. Please report bugs/suggestions in this thread and I will update the file as they get fixed. Cheers.

You get a -1 if you kill yourself, ie got a bit too close when dive bombing or rocket strafing. Not an issue on this server but it also can happen when firing a catapult launched missile at too low altitude

It's because the AI have the flight model of this...

Time for testing :thumbup:

Will there be an option to dismount the gun camera?

I don't think a simple pilot skin is a such a drain on resources it will impact other development. And since when were texture artists responsible for the coding required to fix the current issues in DCS?

MWS and IRAAMs - not worth a paid upgrade. New 3d interior and exterior model, lighting fixed, bugs squashed - not worth a paid upgrade. MWS and IRAAMs, AND New 3d interior and exterior model, lighting fixed, bugs squashed - not worth a paid upgrade. All of the above AND not a single baked in reflection - TAKE MY MONEY

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3765526&postcount=144

Yes, that one with the glass at the back reminds me of a FW-189 or P-61

I would support that idea fully if the L-39 could carry R-13M or R-60. Can't get a tone in a dogfight with R-3S. I did manage to shoot down a Harrier with an R-3S last night but only because he didn't know I was there. Using a trainer to beat F-5's in a turn fight is very satisfying

Yep as if setting up warehouses wasn't tedious enough already. Very annoying. Almost as annoying as watching an AIM-9 come off the rails of an F-5 and watch it fly all the way into your cockpit but not being able to do a damn thing about it :cry:

Definitely don't bother with the RX590, just overclock your 580. I can get mine up to 1500Mhz. Might have trouble finding a 1080ti at a decent price?

PESA can too e.g Zaslon on MiG-31 and Irbis-E on Su-35

No need it's a freeware mod not an official module

I like hitting the ground targets about half the time. Nice to mix it up from time to time. Though the godlike reaction time and accuracy of ground fire does make it frustrating sometimes. I am surprised this server isn't more popular with chopper pilots. Much better survival odds than going up against look down shoot down capable opponents.

I'm not even saying you're wrong, and in the images you have it does look wrong... But 2d representations of a 3d object can be deceptive at the best of times.

Why oh why does every post on model errors compare against photos at a different perspective? Makes them almost impossible to take seriously. Unfortunately the pics are dead now but in this thread https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=186681 Overstratos is taking measurements of the real thing. In another thread he mentions he has regular access whenever he needs to check something.

It'd be nice if the default R-828 channels matched the main airfields.

I thought it was about the list of bugs of the A-10 and Ka-50 that has been growing steadily over the years and to show that even the oldest modules aren't working as they should

S has no radar and therefore a simpler gunsight. Not sure which is heavier, radar or extra gun and ammo, lighter plane possibly has the edge in a turnfight